Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

dxtrx-Prescreening request / Editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dxtrx
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    If not technically overexposed, then very close to it.
    Got it. Thanks a lot.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. Some comments on this one please. I'm wondering whether it is overexposed or not. Thanks.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_66711.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1083555
    If not technically overexposed, then very close to it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Hi. Some comments on this one please. I'm wondering whether it is overexposed or not. Thanks.Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_66711.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1083555

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    I see you uploaded it already. As you fail again to follow the easy steps for pre-screening, don't expect any further advice from me.
    Sorry, it has been removed from the queue now.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
    Some comments on this one please. Thank you.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4524.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1078790
    I see you uploaded it already. As you fail again to follow the easy steps for pre-screening, don't expect any further advice from me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Some comments on this one please. Thank you.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4524.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	1.41 MB
ID:	1078790

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    Both look OK here.
    Many Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
    May I ask for a prescreening for these two images? Thanks.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2284.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1078680
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1758.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1078679
    Both look OK here.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    May I ask for a prescreening for these two images? Thanks.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2284.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	1.23 MB
ID:	1078680
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1758.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	1.19 MB
ID:	1078679

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I see you've appealed anyway. Your choice to do so, but ignoring advice given (or appealing before asking for advice) usually means I won't be offering advice any more.
    Sorry I was a little bit nervous yesterday and didn't think up of asking for advice in the fourm in the first place.
    It won't happen again, and I apologize for any inconvenience.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    I see you've appealed anyway. Your choice to do so, but ignoring advice given (or appealing before asking for advice) usually means I won't be offering advice any more.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dxtrx View Post
    Hi. I've got a rejected photo recently: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7836760
    But I can't figure out the difference between this rejected one and the photo below (about their color), which was already been accepted.
    Click image for larger version Name:	B-30CM.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.23 MB ID:	1078287 Some help and editing advices please. Many thanks!
    Color should be ok. Just fix the horizon and try again.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Hi. I've got a rejected photo recently: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7836760
    But I can't figure out the difference between this rejected one and the photo below (about their color), which was already been accepted.
    Click image for larger version  Name:	B-30CM.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.23 MB ID:	1078287 Some help and editing advices please. Many thanks!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by dxtrx View Post

    Thanks. I lowered the sharpness of the first two and made them all 1280px. Do they look better now?
    These would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • dxtrx
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    First two borderline; last two for sure will have issues with sharpening and heat haze as it is much more visible at higher resolutions.
    Thanks. I lowered the sharpness of the first two and made them all 1280px. Do they look better now?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2797.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	970.2 KB
ID:	1077968Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3006.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	917.6 KB
ID:	1077969Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2735.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	943.1 KB
ID:	1077970Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_2224.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	914.0 KB
ID:	1077971

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X