RSD hue/color - editing advice

[RSD]

Hello,

Still trying to demystify the screening process here. ( thank you on previous threads)
I have just got results for 2 airplanes, with the 313 accepted where I was certain of rejection and the b738 rejected where I sure of acceptance.
Another interesting fact, if I may, is the exact opposite screening result at planespotters, where the same 2 exports were screened.

Nevertheless, I would like to try to understand how this hue/color saturation is judged here
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277671

I m guessing it is an over saturation, since the hue is unchanged. I do not believe it is an under.

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hello,

Still trying to demystify the screening process here. ( thank you on previous threads)
I have just got results for 2 airplanes, with the 313 accepted where I was certain of rejection and the b738 rejected where I sure of acceptance.
Another interesting fact, if I may, is the exact opposite screening result at planespotters, where the same 2 exports were screened.

Nevertheless, I would like to try to understand how this hue/color saturation is judged here
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7277671

I m guessing it is an over saturation, since the hue is unchanged. I do not believe it is an under.

Thank you

Doesn't look too bad to me; cyan/blue a bit strong but other than that looks ok.

See right side here:

[RSD]

Doesn't look too bad to me; cyan/blue a bit strong but other than that looks ok.

See right side here:

[ATTACH=CONFIG]24335[/ATTACH]

Thanks for the feedback. I actually had put -5 vibrance. I believe that the logo is quite color saturated on the painting itself, for having seen that aircraft many times. Do you think it is worth a appeal ?

[dlowwa]

Thanks for the feedback. I actually had put -5 vibrance. I believe that the logo is quite color saturated on the painting itself, for having seen that aircraft many times. Do you think it is worth a appeal ?

As I said, the cyan/blue is a little too strong, so if the appeal came to me, I would reject it again. I advise correcting the color as I suggested in the example, and then re-submitting.

[RSD]

[Editing advice ] Pre-screening. Until i get to 10

Hello,

Thanks for the help recently. I down to 3 now wohoo.
I would like to use that method of pre screening, at least until I reach the 10 goal line.

Here are 5 pics that I really like. What do you think ?
Thx in advance

[dlowwa]

Hi, please read this when you get the chance:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

As per #4, we'd like you to keep all of your editing/prescreening requests to a single thread.

Here are 5 pics that I really like. What do you think ?
Thx in advance

1. soft
2. ok
3. dark
4-5 ok

[RSD]

Hello,

Thanks. Looks like you re doing a lot on this advice aspect of the website, appreciated. I wish I had read the thread on pre screening thread before, it's done now. The requirements make sense.
Regarding your pre screen, cool, i'm getting there. May I ask regarding 1 and 3.
1 - If sharp enough, this kind of angle/composition is then acceptable ?
3- So with a black livery, one should go higher in the exposition to compensate ? I actually turned it down before the pre screen export, I guess I had a better gut feeling before
Thx for your help

[dlowwa]

1 - If sharp enough, this kind of angle/composition is then acceptable ?

Nothing technically wrong with the angle (it won't be rejected for this), though some (myself included) don't find it a particularly attractive angle. Given the livery is not really visible, the image will also likely be excluded from FR24.

3- So with a black livery, one should go higher in the exposition to compensate ? I actually turned it down before the pre screen export, I guess I had a better gut feeling before

Dark liveries are a little harder to judge, but looking at the tail and sky, there is some room for brightening to occur.

[RSD]

Nothing technically wrong with the angle (it won't be rejected for this), though some (myself included) don't find it a particularly attractive angle. Given the livery is not really visible, the image will also likely be excluded from FR24.



Dark liveries are a little harder to judge, but looking at the tail and sky, there is some room for brightening to occur.

Thx I ll keep that in mind and add the exp on the sunwing.

[RSD]

Hello everyone,
Would you say this one has a chance? The quality is not there, but the shot is quite nice

[dlowwa]

Hello everyone,
Would you say this one has a chance? The quality is not there, but the shot is quite nice [ATTACH=CONFIG]25106[/ATTACH]

I agree, nice image, but very likely a rejection for soft.

[RSD]

I agree, nice image, but very likely a rejection for soft.

Yeah that s what I thought. Thx

[RSD]

Hello,

I feel this one could have a chance thought it s definitely borderline.
But being french and spotting my presidential plane in Quebec, I would love to be able to submit it
What do you guys think ? I have these two options

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I feel this one could have a chance thought it s definitely borderline.
But being french and spotting my presidential plane in Quebec, I would love to be able to submit it
What do you guys think ? I have these two options
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25239[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25240[/ATTACH]

These images would be considered similar. Please choose just one.

[RSD]

These images would be considered similar. Please choose just one.

Thx for the reply. What I meant is that I had these two that maybe could have a chance, and was trying to get help choosing the one that has the most chance. I would like the first one ( climb) better, so if it is acceptable I will try it out