Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RSD hue/color - editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by RSD View Post
    I would like the first one ( climb) better, so if it is acceptable I will try it out
    This image is very soft, almost blurry. It would have no chance at acceptance.

    Comment


    • #17
      Ok thx I understand

      Comment


      • #18
        Hello,

        I have just received the following reasons for this photo
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7406050

        - Not centered
        - Horizon
        - Part of aircraft cut off.

        I m not going to appeal with 3 reasons given, but I need to clarify the following

        - Aircraft not centered and horizon is well, let s say I would not appeal this because even though it was close enough to me.

        BUT
        - Part of aircraft cut off is most certainly not a valid reason since I have got multiple acceptance with the same cropping (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9350077, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9349719)

        Could we at least clarify this is not a valid reason. As I intend to upload others of this cropping style.

        Thank you !

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by RSD View Post
          Hello,

          I have just received the following reasons for this photo
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7406050

          - Not centered
          - Horizon
          - Part of aircraft cut off.

          I m not going to appeal with 3 reasons given, but I need to clarify the following

          - Aircraft not centered and horizon is well, let s say I would not appeal this because even though it was close enough to me.

          BUT
          - Part of aircraft cut off is most certainly not a valid reason since I have got multiple acceptance with the same cropping (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9350077, https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9349719)

          Could we at least clarify this is not a valid reason. As I intend to upload others of this cropping style.

          Thank you !
          Sorry, but your rejected image is very awkwardly cropped. The aircraft takes up less than half of the frame compared to the wing, while in the other accepted images it fills more of the frame. Cut off/centering, whichever reason you want to apply, the basic idea is that the crop is quite unbalanced.

          Comment


          • #20
            Thank you. It helps me understand better what can be expected on the website.
            I really appreciate your input, I would like to nuance a bit. I would say "the fuselage compared to the wings" as wings are parts of an aircraft, even an airframe (when engines are not). I m sure you understand that there are areas that fall into the cracks based on what the guidelines cover, so and it is definitely hard to understand to what extend creative work is allowed.

            Comment


            • #21
              Can I ask if this crop would have been accepted then ? I have seen tails cut off on the website, but again, not sure.Click image for larger version

Name:	P46T_Private_N819MA_DSC02327.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	613.2 KB
ID:	1040492

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by RSD View Post
                Can I ask if this crop would have been accepted then ? I have seen tails cut off on the website, but again, not sure.[ATTACH=CONFIG]25951[/ATTACH]
                Borderline. Might be acceptable if it were a new reg. In any case, better than the rejected version.

                Comment


                • #23
                  It is a new reg
                  If I may ask, what makes is borderline ? Heavy tail cutoff ?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by RSD View Post
                    It is a new reg
                    If I may ask, what makes is borderline ? Heavy tail cutoff ?
                    Yeah, just pretty tight. I can tell you probably couldn't get a better angle, but if it were a regular (i.e. not a new reg) frame, much less chance of being acceptable.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                      Yeah, just pretty tight. I can tell you probably couldn't get a better angle, but if it were a regular (i.e. not a new reg) frame, much less chance of being acceptable.
                      Yeah this is the lense halfway trought the fence haha, impossible to do it with more angle.
                      I hesitate to reupload. I had my ratio above 50 for once. Dilemma...

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hello,
                        So I received "Part of aircraft cut off". Everyone agrees with this ?
                        I am pretty sure i have seen a lot of this crops on the website, with the wing cut off. If this is deserved rejection, can I get more info ?

                        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7425529

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by RSD View Post
                          Hello,
                          So I received "Part of aircraft cut off". Everyone agrees with this ?
                          I am pretty sure i have seen a lot of this crops on the website, with the wing cut off. If this is deserved rejection, can I get more info ?

                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7425529
                          As with your previous one, awkward crop on the left side. Better to leave the whole stabilizer in.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X