Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

[dlowwa]

Hello, i would like to ask you what should I put for this plane.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29669[/ATTACH] Military one ? A business one ?
And also if you can check it, i see a little purple tint around the reg and other parts.
If you can also pre-screen those four.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29670[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29671[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29672[/ATTACH]
for those three I'm really not sure about the exposure and contrast.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29673[/ATTACH]
for this one I also see a little purple tint and I would like to know if it might cause a rejection.

Thank you !

There is some purple fringing/CA visible on all of them, but I don't think it's bad enough to cause a rejection.

1. oversharpened. not military.
2. soft/blurry toward edges
3. borderline oversharpened/contrast
4. contrast
5. ok

[bapt0708]

There is some purple fringing/CA visible on all of them, but I don't think it's bad enough to cause a rejection.

1. oversharpened. not military.
2. soft/blurry toward edges
3. borderline oversharpened/contrast
4. contrast
5. ok

Thank you !

I tried to rework the 777 from the raw is it any better ?


Also, I would like to know which setting I should change in PS to unsharp a pic. I tried with the unsharp mask but did something worst.
I would like to know if I can also have a pre-screening for those three, they are the last of a session and I'm really not sure about them.



Thank you !

[dlowwa]

Thank you !

I tried to rework the 777 from the raw is it any better ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]29679[/ATTACH]

I would still consider that borderline.

Also, I would like to know which setting I should change in PS to unsharp a pic. I tried with the unsharp mask but did something worst.

I've never had so make an image less sharp, so can't help you there. Indeed 'unsharp mask' is actually a way to sharpen images, despite the name.

I would like to know if I can also have a pre-screening for those three, they are the last of a session and I'm really not sure about them.

All three have issues with color and contrast. The former two may be fixable, the latter probably not.

[bapt0708]

I would still consider that borderline.



I've never had so make an image less sharp, so can't help you there. Indeed 'unsharp mask' is actually a way to sharpen images, despite the name.



All three have issues with color and contrast. The former two may be fixable, the latter probably not.

Thank you!

[bapt0708]

Hello, i took some shots today and I would like to check them with you. From 1 to 3 I'm not sure if the exposure is ok as the foreground and the background are really dark. For the 4th maybe some heat haze. And the 5th my biggest concerns are about exposure and contrast. If you notice others problems, let me know. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello, i took some shots today and I would like to check them with you. From 1 to 3 I'm not sure if the exposure is ok as the foreground and the background are really dark. For the 4th maybe some heat haze. And the 5th my biggest concerns are about exposure and contrast. If you notice others problems, let me know. Thank you.

All images are soft, with 2, 3, and 5 also borderline for contrast.

[bapt0708]

All images are soft, with 2, 3, and 5 also borderline for contrast.

Thank you are them any better ? added sharpening and added/removed some contrast for 2,4, and 5. I also would like to ask if i should request approval for 1920pix ? My first attempt was rejected due to too little acceptance ratio. I'm now up to 54% do you think it would be ok ? Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Thank you are them any better ? added sharpening and added/removed some contrast for 2,4, and 5. I also would like to ask if i should request approval for 1920pix ? My first attempt was rejected due to too little acceptance ratio. I'm now up to 54% do you think it would be ok ? Thank you.

First ok, second contrast and soft/blurry towards the tail, third borderline soft/heathaze, fourth dark/contrast, soft, fifth borderline contrast.

[bapt0708]

First ok, second contrast and soft/blurry towards the tail, third borderline soft/heathaze, fourth dark/contrast, soft, fifth borderline contrast.

Thank you !

[bapt0708]

Hello, this is my first attempt submitting a 1600pix and i would like some feed-back, especially about sharpening.
Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello, this is my first attempt submitting a 1600pix and i would like some feed-back, especially about sharpening.

Sharpening should be ok on this one.

[bapt0708]

Hello, I would like to have a pre-screening for those four.
For the first one I also would like to know if it would be considered similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9366710
For 2 and 3 my biggest concern are about exposure and contrast.
For the 4 I also would like to know if the livery change would be considered as hot as the special scheme has been removed. Registration is CN-RGH

[dlowwa]

Hello, I would like to have a pre-screening for those four.
For the first one I also would like to know if it would be considered similar to this one: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9366710
For 2 and 3 my biggest concern are about exposure and contrast.
For the 4 I also would like to know if the livery change would be considered as hot as the special scheme has been removed. Registration is CN-RGH

1. soft, color
2. borderline oversharpened/overexposed
3. borderline color
4. ok

Don't see any that would qualify as similar.

[bapt0708]

1. soft, color
2. borderline oversharpened/overexposed
3. borderline color
4. ok

Don't see any that would qualify as similar.

Thank you.

For the 737 is the color problem about the undersaturation or something else ?

I would also like to know if this one is not too soft for a 1600px ? This is only my third attempt.

[dlowwa]

For the 737 is the color problem about the undersaturation or something else ?

Magenta/pink cast.

I would also like to know if this one is not too soft for a 1600px ? This is only my third attempt.

Yes, borderline soft, though would be ok for me.