Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those two please. I know they are similar but, i would like to know which one as the best chances, I'am really worried about contrast here. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5720.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	1.32 MB
ID:	1127129Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5722.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	1.40 MB
ID:	1127130
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
      Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those two please. I know they are similar but, i would like to know which one as the best chances, I'am really worried about contrast here. Thank you.

      Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5720.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.32 MB ID:	1127129Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5722.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.40 MB ID:	1127130
      Im not a screener, indeed they are contrast problem. A little smokey (As my experience, similar images will not be prescreened by crew)

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
        Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those two please. I know they are similar but, i would like to know which one as the best chances, I'am really worried about contrast here. Thank you.
        Hello, similar images will not be prescreened.

        Comment


        • Yes sorry, so can i have a pre-screening only on the first one ?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
            Yes sorry, so can i have a pre-screening only on the first one ?
            Would be rejected for contrast, soft, noise, horizon.

            Comment


            • Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those 5 please.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4930.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	1.31 MB
ID:	1127329Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4621.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	623.4 KB
ID:	1127330Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4150.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	1.89 MB
ID:	1127331Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4645.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	651.0 KB
ID:	1127332Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5177.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	673.2 KB
ID:	1127333

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                Hello, may i have a pre-screening for those 5 please.
                1. horizon, borderline (harsh) contrast
                2-5. soft, heat hazed

                Comment


                • Thank you, may i ask for a pre-screening on those 5 please.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5140.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	396.7 KB
ID:	1127425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5277.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	448.4 KB
ID:	1127426Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5234.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	688.8 KB
ID:	1127427Click image for larger version

Name:	PRI:F-GCSM.jpg
Views:	72
Size:	1.71 MB
ID:	1127428Click image for larger version

Name:	PRI:F-HNJM.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	1.50 MB
ID:	1127429

                  Comment


                  • Hello, may I get a pre-screening of those two please? I'm worried about the softness and the over exposition? As I think of my pics I am always borderline for the softness and still can't really tell if a pic is soft or no, and always worried to do an over-sharpened pic. Thank you for your help.
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENX.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	959.0 KB
ID:	1135118Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-NOL.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	1.46 MB
ID:	1135119

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                      Hello, may I get a pre-screening of those two please? I'm worried about the softness and the over exposition? As I think of my pics I am always borderline for the softness and still can't really tell if a pic is soft or no, and always worried to do an over-sharpened pic.
                      Exposure looks ok, but yes softness/sharpening may be an issue. You would benefit from submitting at a lower resolution.

                      Comment


                      • Thank you for your answer I tried one with a higher sharpening and the other with a lower resolution so, are they any better?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	SP-ENX2.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	765.8 KB
ID:	1135181Click image for larger version

Name:	EC-NOL2.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	1.38 MB
ID:	1135182

                        Also few questions for you:

                        - For over exposition you can see when in the histogram the right side is climbing to the top right corner?

                        - For sharpening how do you see that? Because I assume it's with the magnify tool, but I don't now what should I be looking for, If someone has an example to see.

                        -And the last one I use photoshop and to sharpen my pics I use smart sharpen tool, with this setting; amount 100%, reduce noise 25%, remove lens blur, and I play with the radius to sharpen between 0,2 and 1. Is it the best way to do it or is there something better?

                        Thank you for your help, have a nice day.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                          Thank you for your answer I tried one with a higher sharpening and the other with a lower resolution so, are they any better?
                          Both would be rejected. Lower resolution means in the ~1280 range. The second image is badly oversharpened, and has no chance at 1920pix.

                          Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                          Also few questions for you:

                          - For over exposition you can see when in the histogram the right side is climbing to the top right corner?

                          - For sharpening how do you see that? Because I assume it's with the magnify tool, but I don't now what should I be looking for, If someone has an example to see.

                          -And the last one I use photoshop and to sharpen my pics I use smart sharpen tool, with this setting; amount 100%, reduce noise 25%, remove lens blur, and I play with the radius to sharpen between 0,2 and 1. Is it the best way to do it or is there something better?

                          Thank you for your help, have a nice day.
                          A peak on the right edge of the histogram can indicate overexposure, yes.

                          I never use the magnify tool to check sharpening, and I doubt anyone else does either, as it would be far too time-intensive. We can tell simply by looking at the image.

                          The amount of sharpening needed is almost never uniform, as images are rarely all the same sharpness out of the camera. Personally, I adjust sharpening for each image as needed.

                          Comment


                          • Hello, with all your advice I tried to edit this shot, Is this one ok? Especially for sharpening?
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8911.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	1.64 MB
ID:	1135289
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                              Hello, with all your advice I tried to edit this shot, Is this one ok? Especially for sharpening?
                              Would be ok for me, though chances would improve at a lower resolution.

                              Comment


                              • Ok, thank you for your help.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X