Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    I added contrast for this one:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0476.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	573.0 KB
ID:	1040419
    I added blur for these 2 i don't know if it's the good setting to change for the overprocessing
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0392.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	656.5 KB
ID:	1040418
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	558.7 KB
ID:	1040417
    Is this better or not ?

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
      I added contrast for this one:
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25877[/ATTACH]
      I added blur for these 2 i don't know if it's the good setting to change for the overprocessing
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25876[/ATTACH]
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25875[/ATTACH]
      Is this better or not ?
      1. overprocessed, borderline soft/contrast. will never be better than borderline due to the angle of the aircraft/light.
      2. borderline soft
      3. overprocessed

      Overprocessed = editing halos.

      Comment


      • #63
        I added sharpen for this one:
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0392.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	693.1 KB
ID:	1040440
        And two other questions:
        For the borderline the picture has a chance to be accepted or not ?
        for example you said previously for this one:
        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0476.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	543.6 KB
ID:	1040441
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        4. borderline contrast
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        will never be better than borderline due to the angle of the aircraft/light.
        So this photo will be acceptable for JP because the borderline is the best that it can be, or not acceptable for JP ?

        Second question if i understood what you said previously the editing halos can't be fixed. But can be avoided in the first place (with the RAW file ?) and how the halos can be avoided ?


        Thank you.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
          I added sharpen for this one:
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25898[/ATTACH]
          Oversharpened now.

          Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
          For the borderline the picture has a chance to be accepted or not ?
          for example you said previously for this one:
          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25899[/ATTACH]

          So this photo will be acceptable for JP because the borderline is the best that it can be, or not acceptable for JP ?
          Borderline = may or may not be acceptable. Neither good, nor bad enough to say for certain.

          Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
          Second question if i understood what you said previously the editing halos can't be fixed. But can be avoided in the first place (with the RAW file ?) and how the halos can be avoided ?
          RAW files should generally not have any halos, since they have not had any editing/processing applied to them, so reprocessing a new jpeg from the RAW without whichever step introduced the halos in the first place should yield better results.

          Comment


          • #65
            Reworked this one, is it better ?
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0392.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	558.0 KB
ID:	1040452
            An other question for the halos, this is the original picture of the 747 (i just resized it and centered)
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	575.3 KB
ID:	1040453
            Which step can introduce halos ?
            And how can you see halos ?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
              Reworked this one, is it better ?
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25910[/ATTACH]
              Maybe a touch soft, but ok for me.

              Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
              An other question for the halos, this is the original picture of the 747 (i just resized it and centered)
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25911[/ATTACH]
              Which step can introduce halos ?
              Don't see any halos on this; usually they result from using such features as clarity, de-haze, shadow/highlight, etc..

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Maybe a touch soft, but ok for me.
                I uploaded it. Thank you.

                now i edit the 747, are there any halos on this one ? And is it good ?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	618.4 KB
ID:	1040460

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                  I uploaded it. Thank you.

                  now i edit the 747, are there any halos on this one ? And is it good ?
                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]25918[/ATTACH]
                  Soft and dust spots.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    Soft and dust spots.
                    Is it better now ?
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	669.4 KB
ID:	1040473

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                      Is it better now ?
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25931[/ATTACH]
                      Oversharpened and dust spots.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	524.7 KB
ID:	1040479

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                          Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?
                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]25937[/ATTACH]
                          Soft, and at least one dust spot below tail.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Reworked it.
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0285.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	530.0 KB
ID:	1040481
                            I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by bapt0708 View Post
                              Reworked it.
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]25939[/ATTACH]
                              I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.
                              Overprocessed/manipulation for bad edit/dust removal below tail, and oversharpened. Not going to comment on this image any more.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                No problem, your help is really appreciated.

                                May i have a pre-screening please.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0306.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	533.3 KB
ID:	1040497
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0429.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	614.6 KB
ID:	1040498
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0470.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	582.6 KB
ID:	1040499
                                Thank you.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X