Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

[bapt0708]

I added contrast for this one:

I added blur for these 2 i don't know if it's the good setting to change for the overprocessing


Is this better or not ?

[dlowwa]

I added contrast for this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25877[/ATTACH]
I added blur for these 2 i don't know if it's the good setting to change for the overprocessing
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25876[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25875[/ATTACH]
Is this better or not ?

1. overprocessed, borderline soft/contrast. will never be better than borderline due to the angle of the aircraft/light.
2. borderline soft
3. overprocessed

Overprocessed = editing halos.

[bapt0708]

I added sharpen for this one:

And two other questions:
For the borderline the picture has a chance to be accepted or not ?
for example you said previously for this one:

4. borderline contrast

will never be better than borderline due to the angle of the aircraft/light.

So this photo will be acceptable for JP because the borderline is the best that it can be, or not acceptable for JP ?

Second question if i understood what you said previously the editing halos can't be fixed. But can be avoided in the first place (with the RAW file ?) and how the halos can be avoided ?


Thank you.

[dlowwa]

I added sharpen for this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25898[/ATTACH]

Oversharpened now.

For the borderline the picture has a chance to be accepted or not ?
for example you said previously for this one:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25899[/ATTACH]

So this photo will be acceptable for JP because the borderline is the best that it can be, or not acceptable for JP ?

Borderline = may or may not be acceptable. Neither good, nor bad enough to say for certain.

Second question if i understood what you said previously the editing halos can't be fixed. But can be avoided in the first place (with the RAW file ?) and how the halos can be avoided ?

RAW files should generally not have any halos, since they have not had any editing/processing applied to them, so reprocessing a new jpeg from the RAW without whichever step introduced the halos in the first place should yield better results.

[bapt0708]

Reworked this one, is it better ?

An other question for the halos, this is the original picture of the 747 (i just resized it and centered)

Which step can introduce halos ?
And how can you see halos ?

[dlowwa]

Reworked this one, is it better ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25910[/ATTACH]

Maybe a touch soft, but ok for me.

An other question for the halos, this is the original picture of the 747 (i just resized it and centered)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25911[/ATTACH]
Which step can introduce halos ?

Don't see any halos on this; usually they result from using such features as clarity, de-haze, shadow/highlight, etc..

[bapt0708]

Maybe a touch soft, but ok for me.

I uploaded it. Thank you.

now i edit the 747, are there any halos on this one ? And is it good ?

[dlowwa]

I uploaded it. Thank you.

now i edit the 747, are there any halos on this one ? And is it good ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25918[/ATTACH]

Soft and dust spots.

[bapt0708]

Soft and dust spots.

Is it better now ?

[dlowwa]

Is it better now ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25931[/ATTACH]

Oversharpened and dust spots.

[bapt0708]

Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?

[dlowwa]

Reworked it, is it better ? I didn't see any more dust spots where are they ?
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25937[/ATTACH]

Soft, and at least one dust spot below tail.

[bapt0708]

Reworked it.

I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.

[dlowwa]

Reworked it.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]25939[/ATTACH]
I still can't see anything, but i passed the corrector below the tail.

Overprocessed/manipulation for bad edit/dust removal below tail, and oversharpened. Not going to comment on this image any more.

[bapt0708]

No problem, your help is really appreciated.

May i have a pre-screening please.



Thank you.