Bapt0708: Pre-screening/How to do a better editing ?

[dlowwa]

Hello, got this one rejected for bad info CN, I uploaded it with the serial I found on the official F-XXXX registry which is: 7801 L
So what CN should I use for this upload? only 7801 ?
Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10566632

Correct.

[bapt0708]

Hello, got this one rejected for bad info CN, I uploaded it with the serial I found on the official F-XXXX registry which is: 7801 L
So what CN should I use for this upload? only 7801 ?
Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10566632

[dlowwa]

Hello, I got this rejection for bad color I can see a small yellow tint, but I didn't thought it would cause a rejection.
What do you think? Is it worth appealing this one?
Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10523733

A bit yellow yes, but would have been ok for me.

[bapt0708]

Hello, I got this rejection for bad color I can see a small yellow tint, but I didn't thought it would cause a rejection.
What do you think? Is it worth appealing this one?
Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10523733

[bapt0708]

TAP Airbus seems ok. The dark tones on the DC-3 are underexposed and I wouldn't recommend to cut to tip of the prop like you did here

Regards
Alex

Thank you Alex !

[Alex - Spot-This !]

TAP Airbus seems ok. The dark tones on the DC-3 are underexposed and I wouldn't recommend to cut to tip of the prop like you did here

Regards
Alex

[bapt0708]

Hello, I was wondering how those two would go in pre-screening ?
For this one I'm worried about exposure as the histogram doesn't look very good to me

and for this one mostly the crop.

Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello, I think this would would be rejected for underxeposure if i look at the flat thing on the right of the histogram. I'm i correct with this ?

Also if that's true how can i manage to don't underexpose the pics because i'm using the same settings as usual but and if i add some iso or decrease the shutter speed the pic is just too bright to look at

Too soft for 1920pix, but exposure would be acceptable for me.

[bapt0708]

Hello, I think this would would be rejected for underxeposure if i look at the flat thing on the right of the histogram. I'm i correct with this ?



Also if that's true how can i manage to don't underexpose the pics because i'm using the same settings as usual but and if i add some iso or decrease the shutter speed the pic is just too bright to look at

Thank you for your help.

[bapt0708]

Ok, thank you for your help.

[dlowwa]

Hello, with all your advice I tried to edit this shot, Is this one ok? Especially for sharpening?

Would be ok for me, though chances would improve at a lower resolution.

[bapt0708]

Hello, with all your advice I tried to edit this shot, Is this one ok? Especially for sharpening?

[dlowwa]

Thank you for your answer I tried one with a higher sharpening and the other with a lower resolution so, are they any better?

Both would be rejected. Lower resolution means in the ~1280 range. The second image is badly oversharpened, and has no chance at 1920pix.

Also few questions for you:

- For over exposition you can see when in the histogram the right side is climbing to the top right corner?

- For sharpening how do you see that? Because I assume it's with the magnify tool, but I don't now what should I be looking for, If someone has an example to see.

-And the last one I use photoshop and to sharpen my pics I use smart sharpen tool, with this setting; amount 100%, reduce noise 25%, remove lens blur, and I play with the radius to sharpen between 0,2 and 1. Is it the best way to do it or is there something better?

Thank you for your help, have a nice day.

A peak on the right edge of the histogram can indicate overexposure, yes.

I never use the magnify tool to check sharpening, and I doubt anyone else does either, as it would be far too time-intensive. We can tell simply by looking at the image.

The amount of sharpening needed is almost never uniform, as images are rarely all the same sharpness out of the camera. Personally, I adjust sharpening for each image as needed.

[bapt0708]

Thank you for your answer I tried one with a higher sharpening and the other with a lower resolution so, are they any better?



Also few questions for you:

- For over exposition you can see when in the histogram the right side is climbing to the top right corner?

- For sharpening how do you see that? Because I assume it's with the magnify tool, but I don't now what should I be looking for, If someone has an example to see.

-And the last one I use photoshop and to sharpen my pics I use smart sharpen tool, with this setting; amount 100%, reduce noise 25%, remove lens blur, and I play with the radius to sharpen between 0,2 and 1. Is it the best way to do it or is there something better?

Thank you for your help, have a nice day.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I get a pre-screening of those two please? I'm worried about the softness and the over exposition? As I think of my pics I am always borderline for the softness and still can't really tell if a pic is soft or no, and always worried to do an over-sharpened pic.

Exposure looks ok, but yes softness/sharpening may be an issue. You would benefit from submitting at a lower resolution.