Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre- and post-screening photos - fsx98

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I have five more photos that I would like pre-screened, please:

    N711SY
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N711SY.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	363.8 KB
ID:	1040427

    B-16720
    Click image for larger version

Name:	B-16720_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	543.3 KB
ID:	1040428

    4X-EDI
    Click image for larger version

Name:	4X-EDI.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	573.0 KB
ID:	1040429

    N978SW
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N978SW_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	381.7 KB
ID:	1040430

    N120EE
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N120EE.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	787.2 KB
ID:	1040431

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
      I have five more photos that I would like pre-screened, please:

      N711SY
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25885[/ATTACH]

      B-16720
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25886[/ATTACH]

      4X-EDI
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25887[/ATTACH]

      N978SW
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25888[/ATTACH]

      N120EE
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]25889[/ATTACH]
      1. overprocessed, dark/contrast
      2. heat haze
      3. borderline soft/heat haze
      4. soft/blurry, contrast, overprocessed, dirty
      5. contrast/backlit

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
        1. overprocessed, dark/contrast
        2. heat haze
        3. borderline soft/heat haze
        4. soft/blurry, contrast, overprocessed, dirty
        5. contrast/backlit

        Thanks for the feedback; will most likely bin all of these photos, some due to heat haze, blurry, or backlighting; might try to fix N711SY.

        Comment


        • #19
          I have the following five photos that I would like pre-screened, please:

          Click image for larger version

Name:	N587UA_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	367.3 KB
ID:	1040546Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-ZNC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	369.2 KB
ID:	1040547Click image for larger version

Name:	C-FGYS_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	325.8 KB
ID:	1040548Click image for larger version

Name:	C-GBIP_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	559.7 KB
ID:	1040549Click image for larger version

Name:	N630VA_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	562.7 KB
ID:	1040550

          N587UA
          VH-ZNC
          C-FGYS
          C-GBIP
          N630VA

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
            I have the following five photos that I would like pre-screened, please:

            [ATTACH=CONFIG]26016[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26017[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26018[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26019[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26020[/ATTACH]

            N587UA
            VH-ZNC
            C-FGYS
            C-GBIP
            N630VA
            1. overprocessed, borderline overexposed
            2. soft, contrast
            3. backlit
            4. blurry
            5. blurry, heat haze

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
              1. overprocessed, borderline overexposed
              2. soft, contrast
              3. backlit
              4. blurry
              5. blurry, heat haze
              Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will fix N587UA and VH-ZNC but leaving the rest as personal collections.

              Comment


              • #22
                Here are additional five photos that I would like pre-screened:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	N205CA.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	360.8 KB
ID:	1040594Click image for larger version

Name:	N499CA_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	439.1 KB
ID:	1040595Click image for larger version

Name:	N908SW.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	334.3 KB
ID:	1040596Click image for larger version

Name:	N950JT_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	685.8 KB
ID:	1040597Click image for larger version

Name:	N67052_2_1024.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	389.0 KB
ID:	1040598

                N205CA
                N499CA
                N908SW
                N950JT
                N67052

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
                  Here are additional five photos that I would like pre-screened:

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]26069[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26070[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26071[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26072[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26073[/ATTACH]

                  N205CA
                  N499CA
                  N908SW
                  N950JT
                  N67052
                  1. overprocessed, centering
                  2. borderline blurry/heat hazed
                  3. contrast. not fixable.
                  4. ok
                  5. blurry, contrast

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                    1. overprocessed, centering
                    2. borderline blurry/heat hazed
                    3. contrast. not fixable.
                    4. ok
                    5. blurry, contrast
                    Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will give the JetBlue a go and fix N205CA; everything else are for personal collection.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I have another round of five photos that I would like pre-screened:

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	N38473.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	404.2 KB
ID:	1040642Click image for larger version

Name:	N8702L.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	1.03 MB
ID:	1040643Click image for larger version

Name:	N485WN_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	461.1 KB
ID:	1040644Click image for larger version

Name:	N905AN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	758.9 KB
ID:	1040645Click image for larger version

Name:	N920WN.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	503.7 KB
ID:	1040646

                      N38473
                      N8702L
                      N485WN
                      N905AN
                      N920WN

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
                        I have another round of five photos that I would like pre-screened:

                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]26119[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26120[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26121[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26122[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]26123[/ATTACH]

                        N38473
                        N8702L
                        N485WN
                        N905AN
                        N920WN
                        All would be rejected:

                        1. contrast, blurry, compression
                        2. centering, soft, overexposed
                        3. dark, contrast, soft, compression/noise, overprocessed
                        4. contrast, soft, blurry, compression/noise
                        5. dark/contrast, soft/heat haze, noise/compression

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                          All would be rejected:

                          1. contrast, blurry, compression
                          2. centering, soft, overexposed
                          3. dark, contrast, soft, compression/noise, overprocessed
                          4. contrast, soft, blurry, compression/noise
                          5. dark/contrast, soft/heat haze, noise/compression
                          Thanks Dana; may fix N8720L but probably hold off N485WN for now, and the rest are for my personal collection.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I had a photo of N830AN recently rejected for dark/underexposed; I have increased the exposure a bit, but was also worried about the glare on the rear of the aircraft; is this improved photo good enough for a re-upload to the queue?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	N830AN_3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	742.8 KB
ID:	1040774

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
                              I had a photo of N830AN recently rejected for dark/underexposed; I have increased the exposure a bit, but was also worried about the glare on the rear of the aircraft; is this improved photo good enough for a re-upload to the queue?

                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26267[/ATTACH]
                              Hi, I d like a link to the rejected image.

                              From what I see in the posted image theres a dark feel, theres detail loss around the tower - noise reduction? The glare on the airframe is completely blown of detail. Theres evidence of noise. either way pls post the rejected image and happy to have a look as I am sure other crew/forum will. Cheers T.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by 777MAN View Post
                                Hi, I d like a link to the rejected image.

                                From what I see in the posted image theres a dark feel, theres detail loss around the tower - noise reduction? The glare on the airframe is completely blown of detail. Theres evidence of noise. either way pls post the rejected image and happy to have a look as I am sure other crew/forum will. Cheers T.
                                Here's the photo rejected:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	79722_1561946054.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	900.9 KB
ID:	1040775

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X