Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre- and post-screening photos - fsx98

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    Here's the photo rejected:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26268[/ATTACH]
    This would also be rejected for dark.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
      This would also be rejected for dark.
      Thanks Dana; was wondering which areas of the photo would be dark?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
        Thanks Dana; was wondering which areas of the photo would be dark?
        The whole image is underexposed.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
          The whole image is underexposed.
          Thanks for the clarification, Dana; will start over and see if I could brighten up the photo further.

          Comment


          • #35
            I have another photo, N7869A, rejected for overprocessed/bad post-processing and too much/too little contrast; any editing advice if this photo could be improved?

            Here below is the rejected photo:
            Click image for larger version

Name:	N7869A.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	718.7 KB
ID:	1040796

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
              I have another photo, N7869A, rejected for overprocessed/bad post-processing and too much/too little contrast; any editing advice if this photo could be improved?

              Here below is the rejected photo:
              [ATTACH=CONFIG]26295[/ATTACH]
              Don't think this can be improved. Light is quite poor, and tail is soft/blurry.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
                Don't think this can be improved. Light is quite poor, and tail is soft/blurry.
                Thanks Dana; will leave this photo for personal collection for now.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Now I know this is a long-shot attempt, as I have increased contrast and downsized the photo to mask the blurriness, but is this newly-edited photo of N7869A any better?

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	N7869A.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	547.5 KB
ID:	1040814

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
                    Now I know this is a long-shot attempt, as I have increased contrast and downsized the photo to mask the blurriness, but is this newly-edited photo of N7869A any better?

                    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26319[/ATTACH]
                    Still likely a contrast and possibly soft/blurry rejection.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will keep this one in my personal collection.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hi! I have another photo (VH-ZNC) rejected for over-processed/bad post-processing, soft, and too much or too little contrast; any editing advice for the rejected photo?

                        Here below is the rejected photo:

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-ZNC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	423.8 KB
ID:	1040848

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
                          Hi! I have another photo (VH-ZNC) rejected for over-processed/bad post-processing, soft, and too much or too little contrast; any editing advice for the rejected photo?

                          Here below is the rejected photo:

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]26353[/ATTACH]
                          Given that you already asked for prescreening on this one and I told you is would be rejected for soft & contrast..no. You're free to disregard any advice you get, but we're also under no obligation to give it out especially if you're asking for it after the fact, and after you were already told the chances were not good for this one.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            It's been a while, but here are three photos that I would like prescreened, please:

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	N803F.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	518.7 KB
ID:	1041641
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	N958AC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	488.0 KB
ID:	1041642
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	N959UW_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	506.9 KB
ID:	1041643

                            N803F
                            N958AC
                            N959UW

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              All 3 are blurry, #1 is extremely blurry.



                              https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
                              https://www.instagram.com/crosswind_...ography/?hl=en

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I have a hot photo that was rejected for either over processed or bad post processing, and either too much or too little contrast.

                                Here is the following photo that was last rejected:
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	N761ND_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	732.6 KB
ID:	1042193

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X