Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre- and post-screening photos - fsx98

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • fsx98
    replied
    Thanks Dana; will fix this photo and also try to neatly remove the halos.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    I have a photo of N402SY rejected for overexposed and either over-processed or bad post-postprocessing; if I try to lower exposure to compensate the overexposure rejection, would the whole aircraft be rejected for dark as well?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N402SY_1.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	506.7 KB
ID:	1086297
    Borderline light, but probably acceptable. Bigger problems is editing halos are still pretty obvious.

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    I have a photo of N402SY rejected for overexposed and either over-processed or bad post-postprocessing; if I try to lower exposure to compensate the overexposure rejection, would the whole aircraft be rejected for dark as well?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N402SY_1.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	506.7 KB
ID:	1086297

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    Thanks Dana; I have redone the halo removal in a more neater manner on the A321 and reuploaded it; I have also reuploaded the B737 with a less washed out sky and toned-down contrast as a last attempt.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    N127AA for either overprocessed or bad postprocessing
    Not sure what exactly you've done, but you've really messed up editing the sky above the aircraft.

    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    N414WN for either too much or too little contrast;
    Contrast's a bit harsh, and the washed out sky in the background isn't helping either.

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    Hi everyone; it's been a while, but I have two photos that are rejected for the same reasons in each photo since after the last edit:

    N127AA for either overprocessed or bad postprocessing;
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N127AA_1.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	550.7 KB
ID:	1085715

    N414WN for either too much or too little contrast;
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N414WN_8.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	543.2 KB
ID:	1085716

    Any specific feedback on these rejections are appreciated.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • CrosswindPhoto
    replied
    To me it's soft at the nose, and kinda flat.


    A small tip, you will very rarely get an overcast sky photo on JP. Not badmouthing JP, but thats just how it works
    Not sure where the over/bad-processing rejection is coming form without equalizing it.

    Tim

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    I have a hot photo that was rejected for either over processed or bad post processing, and either too much or too little contrast.

    Here is the following photo that was last rejected:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]27927[/ATTACH]
    Yes, I agree with that rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    I have a hot photo that was rejected for either over processed or bad post processing, and either too much or too little contrast.

    Here is the following photo that was last rejected:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N761ND_4.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	732.6 KB
ID:	1042193

    Leave a comment:


  • CrosswindPhoto
    replied
    All 3 are blurry, #1 is extremely blurry.

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    It's been a while, but here are three photos that I would like prescreened, please:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	N803F.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	518.7 KB
ID:	1041641
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N958AC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	488.0 KB
ID:	1041642
    Click image for larger version

Name:	N959UW_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	506.9 KB
ID:	1041643

    N803F
    N958AC
    N959UW

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    Hi! I have another photo (VH-ZNC) rejected for over-processed/bad post-processing, soft, and too much or too little contrast; any editing advice for the rejected photo?

    Here below is the rejected photo:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26353[/ATTACH]
    Given that you already asked for prescreening on this one and I told you is would be rejected for soft & contrast..no. You're free to disregard any advice you get, but we're also under no obligation to give it out especially if you're asking for it after the fact, and after you were already told the chances were not good for this one.

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    Hi! I have another photo (VH-ZNC) rejected for over-processed/bad post-processing, soft, and too much or too little contrast; any editing advice for the rejected photo?

    Here below is the rejected photo:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-ZNC.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	423.8 KB
ID:	1040848

    Leave a comment:


  • fsx98
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback, Dana; will keep this one in my personal collection.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by fsx98 View Post
    Now I know this is a long-shot attempt, as I have increased contrast and downsized the photo to mask the blurriness, but is this newly-edited photo of N7869A any better?

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]26319[/ATTACH]
    Still likely a contrast and possibly soft/blurry rejection.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X