Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would these two be acceptable photos?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05174-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	318.1 KB
ID:	1043617

    Would the highlights on the top of the fuselage be an issue in the photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05179.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	310.8 KB
ID:	1043618

    Highlights on top of fuselage an issue? Does the front end of the aircraft look out of focus?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
      Would these two be acceptable photos?

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]29657[/ATTACH]

      Would the highlights on the top of the fuselage be an issue in the photo?

      [ATTACH=CONFIG]29658[/ATTACH]

      Highlights on top of fuselage an issue? Does the front end of the aircraft look out of focus?
      Both images are too dark; the first also shows strong vignetting, and the second is soft.

      Comment


      • Had a couple photo rejections and would like to see if the new edit has met the requirements.

        Here is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7678007 . The photo below is the re-edited version.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02509.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	339.4 KB
ID:	1043653

        Here is the 2nd rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7677928 . Re-edit is below

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03307.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	595.3 KB
ID:	1043654

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
          Had a couple photo rejections and would like to see if the new edit has met the requirements.

          Here is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7678007 . The photo below is the re-edited version.

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]29695[/ATTACH]
          Better, but still a bit dark.

          Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
          Here is the 2nd rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7677928 . Re-edit is below

          [ATTACH=CONFIG]29696[/ATTACH]
          Original would have been ok for me, but I guess the second version does correct what the rejecting screeners saw as an unlevel horizon.

          Comment


          • These are fixes/re-edits from earlier posts

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05179.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	298.7 KB
ID:	1043664Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02509-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	335.6 KB
ID:	1043665

            These are new edits that I would appreciate any feedback or fixes that are needed. Thank you.

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05239.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	613.2 KB
ID:	1043666Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02530.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	569.8 KB
ID:	1043667Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01790.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	331.8 KB
ID:	1043668

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
              These are fixes/re-edits from earlier posts

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]29710[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29711[/ATTACH]

              These are new edits that I would appreciate any feedback or fixes that are needed. Thank you.

              [ATTACH=CONFIG]29712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29714[/ATTACH]
              1. soft
              2. ok for me
              3. dark/contrast, soft
              4-5 ok for me

              Comment


              • Looking for feedback on these photos from various days. Please let me know if there are any things that need addressing. Thank you.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00752 0920.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	91.4 KB
ID:	1074973Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03239 1024.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	205.1 KB
ID:	1074974Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00748 0920.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	105.0 KB
ID:	1074975Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04603 0910.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	89.3 KB
ID:	1074976Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04850-2 0915.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	193.1 KB
ID:	1074977

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                  Looking for feedback on these photos from various days. Please let me know if there are any things that need addressing. Thank you.
                  1. soft, contrast, color
                  2. obstruction, heat haze
                  3. soft, contrast
                  4. contrast
                  5. borderline soft

                  Comment


                  • This is a fix from the previous batch. Please let me know if I have resolved the borderline softness

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04850-3 0915.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	604.4 KB
ID:	1075012

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                      This is a fix from the previous batch. Please let me know if I have resolved the borderline softness
                      Would be ok for me.

                      Comment


                      • https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7702208 this is a rejection for dark and underexposed. Please let me know if this fix is sufficient.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03043 1024.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	323.6 KB
ID:	1075059

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7702208 this is a rejection for dark and underexposed. Please let me know if this fix is sufficient.
                          Would be ok for me.

                          Comment


                          • Would these be acceptable?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05449 1122.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	824.5 KB
ID:	1075169Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05553 1122.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	655.7 KB
ID:	1075168Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05596 1122.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	410.1 KB
ID:	1075167Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05446 1122.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	667.1 KB
ID:	1075166Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05527 1122.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	567.6 KB
ID:	1075165

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                              Would these be acceptable?
                              1-2 dark, heat haze
                              3. borderline soft
                              4. horizon, borderline soft
                              5. soft, borderline dark

                              Comment


                              • For the ones that I could fix, I made some adjustments per your suggestions. Please let me know if the changes are sufficient or may need additional tweaks. Thank you.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05596-2 1122.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	423.3 KB
ID:	1075188Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05446-2 1122.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	682.9 KB
ID:	1075189Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05527-2 1122.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	587.3 KB
ID:	1075190

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X