Pre-screening Help

[bgkicks49]

Would these two be acceptable photos?



Would the highlights on the top of the fuselage be an issue in the photo?



Highlights on top of fuselage an issue? Does the front end of the aircraft look out of focus?

[dlowwa]

Would these two be acceptable photos?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29657[/ATTACH]

Would the highlights on the top of the fuselage be an issue in the photo?

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29658[/ATTACH]

Highlights on top of fuselage an issue? Does the front end of the aircraft look out of focus?

Both images are too dark; the first also shows strong vignetting, and the second is soft.

[bgkicks49]

Had a couple photo rejections and would like to see if the new edit has met the requirements.

Here is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7678007 . The photo below is the re-edited version.



Here is the 2nd rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7677928 . Re-edit is below

[dlowwa]

Had a couple photo rejections and would like to see if the new edit has met the requirements.

Here is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7678007 . The photo below is the re-edited version.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29695[/ATTACH]

Better, but still a bit dark.

Here is the 2nd rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7677928 . Re-edit is below

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29696[/ATTACH]

Original would have been ok for me, but I guess the second version does correct what the rejecting screeners saw as an unlevel horizon.

[bgkicks49]

These are fixes/re-edits from earlier posts



These are new edits that I would appreciate any feedback or fixes that are needed. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

These are fixes/re-edits from earlier posts

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29710[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29711[/ATTACH]

These are new edits that I would appreciate any feedback or fixes that are needed. Thank you.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29712[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29713[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29714[/ATTACH]

1. soft
2. ok for me
3. dark/contrast, soft
4-5 ok for me

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback on these photos from various days. Please let me know if there are any things that need addressing. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Looking for feedback on these photos from various days. Please let me know if there are any things that need addressing. Thank you.

1. soft, contrast, color
2. obstruction, heat haze
3. soft, contrast
4. contrast
5. borderline soft

[bgkicks49]

This is a fix from the previous batch. Please let me know if I have resolved the borderline softness

[dlowwa]

This is a fix from the previous batch. Please let me know if I have resolved the borderline softness

Would be ok for me.

[bgkicks49]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7702208 this is a rejection for dark and underexposed. Please let me know if this fix is sufficient.

[dlowwa]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7702208 this is a rejection for dark and underexposed. Please let me know if this fix is sufficient.

Would be ok for me.

[bgkicks49]

Would these be acceptable?

[dlowwa]

Would these be acceptable?

1-2 dark, heat haze
3. borderline soft
4. horizon, borderline soft
5. soft, borderline dark

[bgkicks49]

For the ones that I could fix, I made some adjustments per your suggestions. Please let me know if the changes are sufficient or may need additional tweaks. Thank you.