Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Any issues with contrast or exposure? Another one of those where the histogram bell does not look like it normally does, but the highlights are not blown out, just need a second opinion. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08471 N174DZ 030720.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	371.8 KB
ID:	1090872
    Very light halos visible, but otherwise should be acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Any issues with contrast or exposure? Another one of those where the histogram bell does not look like it normally does, but the highlights are not blown out, just need a second opinion. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08471 N174DZ 030720.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	371.8 KB
ID:	1090872

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, color, or exposure? Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09115 N657NK 032320.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	514.1 KB
ID:	1090845
    Maybe a touch soft, but I would accept it.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, color, or exposure? Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09115 N657NK 032320.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	514.1 KB
ID:	1090845

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on this photo. Had some trouble with the histogram "bell" shape and was wondering if there are any contrast issues with this photo? Along with contrast, I am worried about the exposure since the histogram did not look like a normal/typical histogram that I usually see. Feedback would be greatly appreciated thank you. If there are other aspects of the photo that I may have missed, please let me know.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04028 N616UX 020220.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	412.8 KB
ID:	1090693
    Looks OK for me

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on this photo. Had some trouble with the histogram "bell" shape and was wondering if there are any contrast issues with this photo? Along with contrast, I am worried about the exposure since the histogram did not look like a normal/typical histogram that I usually see. Feedback would be greatly appreciated thank you. If there are other aspects of the photo that I may have missed, please let me know.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04028 N616UX 020220.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	412.8 KB
ID:	1090693

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    I will surely be able to rectify the contrast/dark issue, potentially, but with the possible backlit rejection, the sun was at my back and is shining clearly on the angle of the planes visible to me/camera angle (in my opinion) especially if you were to look at the tails of the aircraft in formation. For the backlit rejection would that mainly be an issue with 'plane in own shadow' backlit versus actual backlit?
    Correct. 95% of what we see in this image is in shadow. It would be a rejection for me, and I would guess most other screeners as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    I will surely be able to rectify the contrast/dark issue, potentially, but with the possible backlit rejection, the sun was at my back and is shining clearly on the angle of the planes visible to me/camera angle (in my opinion) especially if you were to look at the tails of the aircraft in formation. For the backlit rejection would that mainly be an issue with 'plane in own shadow' backlit versus actual backlit? Just looking for clarification if it will even be worth a second attempt on this photo. It was very spur of the moment as they flew over and would appreciate your insight into the backlit issue. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    I am worried that this shot will be affected by contrast as well as angle of lighting. Any visible issues that you may see with this photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04338 N86WW 052220.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	325.0 KB
ID:	1090271
    Yes, very likely a contrast/dark, or even backlit rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    I am worried that this shot will be affected by contrast as well as angle of lighting. Any visible issues that you may see with this photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04338 N86WW 052220.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	325.0 KB
ID:	1090271

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Since there isn't much I can do in ways of vignette, I have fixed the ratio and crop of the B744 photo. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03834-3 VHOEH 051920.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	462.1 KB
ID:	1090102
    Ratio is within allowable limits now.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Since there isn't much I can do in ways of vignette, I have fixed the ratio and crop of the B744 photo. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03834-3 VHOEH 051920.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	462.1 KB
ID:	1090102

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Fixed the two that I could fix, please let me know if these fixes are sufficient

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03834-2 VHOEH 051920.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	474.3 KB
ID:	1090033Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03595-2 N318RX 051520.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	526.1 KB
ID:	1090034
    1. cropping/ratio
    2. borderline vignetting (top right)

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Fixed the two that I could fix, please let me know if these fixes are sufficient

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03834-2 VHOEH 051920.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	474.3 KB
ID:	1090033Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03595-2 N318RX 051520.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	526.1 KB
ID:	1090034

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post

    1) Any issues with jpeg compression, contrast, and overprocessed?
    No, only heat haze.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    2) Any issues with softness or contrast?
    No, only vignetting and overprocessing.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    3) Any issues with contrast, overprocessed, and softness?
    Yes on overprocessed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X