Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Here are the fixes for the first two photos. Please let me know if these have fixed your issues that you mentioned above. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01792-2 N613CZ 011020.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	315.6 KB
ID:	1087468Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01795-2 N147AA 011020.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	286.1 KB
ID:	1087467
    both look acceptable to me

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Here are the fixes for the first two photos. Please let me know if these have fixed your issues that you mentioned above. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01792-2 N613CZ 011020.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	315.6 KB
ID:	1087468Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01795-2 N147AA 011020.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	286.1 KB
ID:	1087467

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on these photos.

    1) Is the exposure and noise sufficient?
    Borderline/Yes.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    2) Does the exposure look okay and are there any issues with it being soft?
    No/Yes.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    3) First time taking a photo at this airport of this gate guard. I want to make sure contrast looks okay as well as horizon
    Ok/Ok.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    4) I want to make sure there are not any issues with it being soft as well as making sure that it is exposed enough with how the position of the sun is (i.e., is plane in its own shadow?)
    Ok/Ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on these photos.

    1) Is the exposure and noise sufficient?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01792 N613CZ 011020.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	317.0 KB
ID:	1087411

    2) Does the exposure look okay and are there any issues with it being soft?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01795 N147AA 011020.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	287.2 KB
ID:	1087412

    3) First time taking a photo at this airport of this gate guard. I want to make sure contrast looks okay as well as horizon

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00655 N20EP 041820.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	991.9 KB
ID:	1087413

    4) I want to make sure there are not any issues with it being soft as well as making sure that it is exposed enough with how the position of the sun is (i.e., is plane in its own shadow?)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00642 N8513F 041820.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	420.0 KB
ID:	1087414

    Thank you! If there are any issues I missed, I would appreciate you bringing it to my attention.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Here is a re-edit of the SAS, I have slightly decreased the sharpening to account for the oversharpened issue. Please let me know if the heat haze issue is still present. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01424-3 LNRKU 011020.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	664.0 KB
ID:	1087269
    Don't think you're going to be able to get much better than borderline on this one, since the haze will always be present, it's just a matter of how noticeable it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Here is a re-edit of the SAS, I have slightly decreased the sharpening to account for the oversharpened issue. Please let me know if the heat haze issue is still present. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01424-3 LNRKU 011020.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	664.0 KB
ID:	1087269

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Totally understand dlowwa, thank you for the explanation on the previous photo.

    Looking for feedback on this photo. I am worried that it might be affected by heat haze. I am hoping that I am wrong. Would you provide some thoughts on this photo? Thank you. If there are other factors that affect this photo, I would be appreciative if you could bring those to my attention as well.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01424-2 LNRKU 011020.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	769.8 KB
ID:	1087054
    I'd say 50/50 chances at best due to (slightly) noticeable heat haze, and the oversharpening to compensate. Don't see any other major issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Totally understand dlowwa, thank you for the explanation on the previous photo.

    Looking for feedback on this photo. I am worried that it might be affected by heat haze. I am hoping that I am wrong. Would you provide some thoughts on this photo? Thank you. If there are other factors that affect this photo, I would be appreciative if you could bring those to my attention as well.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01424-2 LNRKU 011020.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	769.8 KB
ID:	1087054

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would there be any issues with this photo? is this cropped and framed the correct way? Is horizon level? Any issues with heat haze? Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02946 JA878J 011320.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	761.9 KB
ID:	1086944
    Cropping is acceptable, but pretty high chance of rejection for heat haze, as not only is it visible on the JAL, but the reason you've centered it such is to include the AA 787, and it's even more heavily hazed.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would there be any issues with this photo? is this cropped and framed the correct way? Is horizon level? Any issues with heat haze? Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02946 JA878J 011320.jpg
Views:	118
Size:	761.9 KB
ID:	1086944

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to highlights being blown out, color, contrast and if the horizon is level?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04273 N867DA 090419.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	540.3 KB
ID:	1086802
    Might need a little CW rotation, but the other issues shouldn't apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to highlights being blown out, color, contrast and if the horizon is level?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04273 N867DA 090419.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	540.3 KB
ID:	1086802

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would there be any issues with this photograph? Would the grass be considered an obstruction? Does it have a level horizon and would there be any issues with heat haze? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00567 N9747G 040920.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	581.2 KB
ID:	1086626
    Other than softness, shouldn't be any issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would there be any issues with this photograph? Would the grass be considered an obstruction? Does it have a level horizon and would there be any issues with heat haze? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00567 N9747G 040920.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	581.2 KB
ID:	1086626

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Could you clarify what info was incorrect on the rejection? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8057496
    This is not a civilian aircraft.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Increased sharpness on the tail end yet again and increased contrast to see if that did the trick. I will use this as my last attempt on this photo.
    Still borderline for both. If you're simply touching up the same image you already had rejected, I'd actually recommend re-working it from scratch - if you think the quality is actually there.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X