Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Took your advice and increased sharpness and contrast a bit, but did not want to increase it too much, but I did not do it enough as it warranted a rejection, but I do not understand the rejection for bad info. Could you clarify what info was incorrect on the rejection? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8057496

    Increased sharpness on the tail end yet again and increased contrast to see if that did the trick. I will use this as my last attempt on this photo.

    Thanks

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00538-5 790093 040920.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	368.5 KB
ID:	1086516

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    I decreased the highlight and shadow sliders to help get rid of the editing halos, please let me know if these changes were sufficient. I added a bit of sharpening on the tail end of the aircraft to account for the slight softness on that side and I attempted to increase contrast a bit to make or not borderline anymore. Please let me know if there are any other issues that you see with this photo. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00538-3 790093 040920.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	385.8 KB
ID:	1086497
    Halos gone, but still borderline soft/contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    I decreased the highlight and shadow sliders to help get rid of the editing halos, please let me know if these changes were sufficient. I added a bit of sharpening on the tail end of the aircraft to account for the slight softness on that side and I attempted to increase contrast a bit to make or not borderline anymore. Please let me know if there are any other issues that you see with this photo. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00538-3 790093 040920.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	385.8 KB
ID:	1086497

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Thoughts on this photo? I am looking to see if there are any issues with exposure, color, contrast, jpg compression and if there are any issues with it being backlit since the sun was directly overhead. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00538-2 790093 040920.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	374.7 KB
ID:	1086479
    Not backlit, but editing halos visible, contrast is borderline, and soft towards the right side.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Thoughts on this photo? I am looking to see if there are any issues with exposure, color, contrast, jpg compression and if there are any issues with it being backlit since the sun was directly overhead. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00538-2 790093 040920.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	374.7 KB
ID:	1086479

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Increased sharpness over the whole aircraft just a tad and did a sharpness increase around the reg area as well. I did not want to be too drastic in those changes, so please let me know if this has fixed the softness issue. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02204-3 N577SC 011220.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	413.9 KB
ID:	1086316
    Still borderline for soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Increased sharpness over the whole aircraft just a tad and did a sharpness increase around the reg area as well. I did not want to be too drastic in those changes, so please let me know if this has fixed the softness issue. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02204-3 N577SC 011220.jpg
Views:	80
Size:	413.9 KB
ID:	1086316

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    The United looks ok to me, the GA is a tad soft at places (like the reg)

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would there be any issues with these two photos?

    1) Color, exposure, noise?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04116 N826UA 103119.jpg
Views:	103
Size:	414.9 KB
ID:	1086204

    2) had to crop this one a little bit (is there any visible jpeg compression?), framing, exposure and any noise issues?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02204 N577SC 011220.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	413.6 KB
ID:	1086205

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would these edits be any better than before in regards to the issues above?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941-4 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	401.9 KB
ID:	1086011Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-6 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	395.0 KB
ID:	1086012
    1. soft, overprocessed
    2. borderline dark/contrast/noise

    Not going to comment on these images any further.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would these edits be any better than before in regards to the issues above?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941-4 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	401.9 KB
ID:	1086011Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-6 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	395.0 KB
ID:	1086012

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Hard to fix the vignette issue, but with these two I extended the crop a bit, but not too much so that it was still evenly in the shot and not a lot of empty space. I fixed the overprocessed of the biz jet and increased sharpness ever so slightly to fix the softness issue and I increased brightness just a bit for the single prop so that it was not as dark. Please let me know if the issues above have been resolved. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941-3 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	418.5 KB
ID:	1085953Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-5 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	400.2 KB
ID:	1085954
    1. soft, overprocessed
    2. borderline dark/contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Hard to fix the vignette issue, but with these two I extended the crop a bit, but not too much so that it was still evenly in the shot and not a lot of empty space. I fixed the overprocessed of the biz jet and increased sharpness ever so slightly to fix the softness issue and I increased brightness just a bit for the single prop so that it was not as dark. Please let me know if the issues above have been resolved. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941-3 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	418.5 KB
ID:	1085953Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-5 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	400.2 KB
ID:	1085954

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on these 3 photos:

    1) With this photo, I want to make sure there are not any blown out highlights, that the exposure is good enough and that there are no editing halos visible

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	430.2 KB
ID:	1085925

    2) Same as #1, but also want to make sure that this one is not over processed

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03920 N402FX 020220.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	482.0 KB
ID:	1085926

    3) Revisiting this photo, had issues with contrast and I think jpeg compression. Would like feedback to see if this re-edit fixes these issues?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-2 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	405.8 KB
ID:	1085927

    If I missed anything, please let me know! Thank you in advance!
    1. soft, overprocessed
    2. borderline vignetting
    3. dark

    All images look slightly compressed as well, possibly due to being heavy crops?

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on these 3 photos:

    1) With this photo, I want to make sure there are not any blown out highlights, that the exposure is good enough and that there are no editing halos visible

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03941 CFCPR 020220.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	430.2 KB
ID:	1085925

    2) Same as #1, but also want to make sure that this one is not over processed

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03920 N402FX 020220.jpg
Views:	81
Size:	482.0 KB
ID:	1085926

    3) Revisiting this photo, had issues with contrast and I think jpeg compression. Would like feedback to see if this re-edit fixes these issues?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108-2 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	405.8 KB
ID:	1085927

    If I missed anything, please let me know! Thank you in advance!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X