Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would these photos be acceptable for JP? Looking for feedback on sharpness, contrast, exposure and if there are any editing halos visible, in either photo. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06720 923281 022020.jpg
Views:	174
Size:	521.7 KB
ID:	1081291Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06726 923288 022020.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	464.0 KB
ID:	1081292
    http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
      Would these photos be acceptable for JP? Looking for feedback on sharpness, contrast, exposure and if there are any editing halos visible, in either photo. Thank you

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06720 923281 022020.jpg
Views:	174
Size:	521.7 KB
ID:	1081291Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06726 923288 022020.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	464.0 KB
ID:	1081292
      Both appear somewhat soft towards the edges. Slight blue/cyan cast on the first as well.

      Comment


      • Would this photo be acceptable? Looking for feedback in regards to exposure, sharpness, and horizon. Thank you. Also since this photo is another angle of a photo already in the database with visible different decal near the nose, would this be acceptable for hot as well?

        Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC06855 600359 022120.jpg Views:	0 Size:	564.1 KB ID:	1081339
        http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
          Would this photo be acceptable? Looking for feedback in regards to exposure, sharpness, and horizon. Thank you. Also since this photo is another angle of a photo already in the database with visible different decal near the nose, would this be acceptable for hot as well?

          Click image for larger version Name:	DSC06855 600359 022120.jpg Views:	0 Size:	564.1 KB ID:	1081339
          Hot yes, but acceptable no. Too soft/blurry.

          Comment


          • Would this be a better version of the same aircraft, but from a different photo in the sequence?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	292.1 KB
ID:	1081357
            http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
              Would this be a better version of the same aircraft, but from a different photo in the sequence?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	292.1 KB
ID:	1081357
              This would be rejected for soft, dark, and contrast.

              Comment


              • Please let me know if this edit has fixed the issues that you had brought up in the earlier post. Thank you!

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864-2 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	334.7 KB
ID:	1081416
                http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                  Please let me know if this edit has fixed the issues that you had brought up in the earlier post. Thank you!

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864-2 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	334.7 KB
ID:	1081416
                  Would be rejected for dark, contrast, and possibly soft.

                  Comment


                  • Last attempt, would this fix the issues that you stated in the most recent post?

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864-3 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	323.3 KB
ID:	1081476
                    http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                      Last attempt, would this fix the issues that you stated in the most recent post?

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06864-3 600359 022120.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	323.3 KB
ID:	1081476
                      Probably no longer a dark rejection, but contrast and softness issues remain.

                      Comment


                      • Thank you for your help on the previous photos. I would like your insight on this photo in regards to exposure, contrast, and to see if the horizon looks unlevel to you. Thank you

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06871 N234WN 022120.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	848.4 KB
ID:	1081547
                        http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                          Thank you for your help on the previous photos. I would like your insight on this photo in regards to exposure, contrast, and to see if the horizon looks unlevel to you. Thank you

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06871 N234WN 022120.jpg
Views:	141
Size:	848.4 KB
ID:	1081547
                          Contrast/exposure should be ok, but borderline for obstruction as the tug doesn't seem to be doing much in the image.

                          Comment


                          • Attempting night photography for the first time and could really use your expertise on these photos as to what would be wrong with them. Thank you for your help in advance!

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07134 N926DZ 022420.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	561.2 KB
ID:	1081615Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07139 N329DN 022420.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	582.4 KB
ID:	1081616
                            http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                              Attempting night photography for the first time and could really use your expertise on these photos as to what would be wrong with them. Thank you for your help in advance!

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07134 N926DZ 022420.jpg
Views:	142
Size:	561.2 KB
ID:	1081615Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07139 N329DN 022420.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	582.4 KB
ID:	1081616
                              Not a huge fan of the crop on the first, but both should be ok for quality.

                              Comment


                              • Would this crop be more acceptable? I thought that maybe the tow would be beneficial to the picture, but you are right that it does look a little skewed and takes away from the aircraft in the photo.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07134-2 N926DZ 022420.jpg
Views:	175
Size:	580.0 KB
ID:	1081622
                                http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X