Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Attempting a different aspect photo, yet again, and looking for feedback on these photos if they would be acceptable? Thank you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08458 N314PQ 030720.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	642.7 KB
ID:	1083727Click image for larger version

Name:	20200307_113920 N314PQ 030720.jpg
Views:	164
Size:	460.7 KB
ID:	1083728

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on these few photos to see if they meet your approval for acceptance.

    1) Any issues with heat haze, contrast, or if the trucks are considered an obstruction

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08382 N8528Q 030620.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	785.5 KB
ID:	1083634

    2) Any issues with halos, exposure or contrast?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08249 N742PS 030620.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	485.9 KB
ID:	1083635

    3) same as #2, looking to see if there are any issues with halos, contrast and exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08204 N162FE 030620.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	355.1 KB
ID:	1083636

    Thank you!!
    1) Obstruction
    2) Borderline contrast (most of the aircraft is in its own shadow)
    3) OK

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on these few photos to see if they meet your approval for acceptance.

    1) Any issues with heat haze, contrast, or if the trucks are considered an obstruction

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08382 N8528Q 030620.jpg
Views:	161
Size:	785.5 KB
ID:	1083634

    2) Any issues with halos, exposure or contrast?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08249 N742PS 030620.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	485.9 KB
ID:	1083635

    3) same as #2, looking to see if there are any issues with halos, contrast and exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08204 N162FE 030620.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	355.1 KB
ID:	1083636

    Thank you!!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Are these fixes any better the the previous photos?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08830-3 N305NX 122919.jpg
Views:	187
Size:	804.6 KB
ID:	1082207Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07267-2 N255SY 022620.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	602.0 KB
ID:	1082208
    Both better yes, but I'd still consider the second one borderline.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Are these fixes any better the the previous photos?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08830-3 N305NX 122919.jpg
Views:	187
Size:	804.6 KB
ID:	1082207Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07267-2 N255SY 022620.jpg
Views:	173
Size:	602.0 KB
ID:	1082208

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Could you provide some insight on these two photos? Thank you.

    1) Any issues associated with night shots and if there is any issues with exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07267 N255SY 022620.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	599.6 KB
ID:	1082018

    2) Any issues that you see with horizon? Always have a bit of difficulty with shots like this and horizon

    ​​Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08830-2 N305NX 122919.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	738.9 KB
ID:	1082017
    1. dark/low contrast
    2. horizon indeed badly off

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Could you provide some insight on these two photos? Thank you.

    1) Any issues associated with night shots and if there is any issues with exposure

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07267 N255SY 022620.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	599.6 KB
ID:	1082018

    2) Any issues that you see with horizon? Always have a bit of difficulty with shots like this and horizon

    ​​Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08830-2 N305NX 122919.jpg
Views:	132
Size:	738.9 KB
ID:	1082017

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would this photo be considered hot since the nose compartment has a different casing than this photo? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7781795

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07726 N2704M 022920.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	540.0 KB
ID:	1081911
    No. Only permanent changes qualify as hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would this photo be considered hot since the nose compartment has a different casing than this photo? https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/7781795

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07726 N2704M 022920.jpg
Views:	120
Size:	540.0 KB
ID:	1081911

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07290-5 PHBHN 022620.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	663.4 KB
ID:	1081844

    I decreased the sliders on some of the details and exposure sections within lightroom. Please let me know if these changes lessened some of the "overdone" bits from the previous photo. Thank you
    'Overdone' probably in that you've hit the noise reduction a little too hard. Don't think you're ever going to get more than borderline on this; more NR leads to more compression/overprocessed look, and without, you'd have too much noise.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07290-5 PHBHN 022620.jpg
Views:	137
Size:	663.4 KB
ID:	1081844

    I decreased the sliders on some of the details and exposure sections within lightroom. Please let me know if these changes lessened some of the "overdone" bits from the previous photo. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Which aspect looks overdone? Could you please be a little more specific on the specifics please? I would like to get this right on both hands if possible! Thank you for your feedback!

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    I increased exposure and contrast as well as added some noise reduction. Please let me know your thoughts on these changes.Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07290-4 PHBHN 022620.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	620.1 KB
ID:	1081836
    On one hand it looks a bit overdone, on the other hand I like the night shot colours.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    I increased exposure and contrast as well as added some noise reduction. Please let me know your thoughts on these changes.Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07290-4 PHBHN 022620.jpg
Views:	119
Size:	620.1 KB
ID:	1081836

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would this be an improvement on the photo above with your suggested changes? Thank you for your insight!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07290-2 PHBHN 022620.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	661.9 KB
ID:	1081782
    Slight improvement, yes, but still quite noisy and exposure/contrast likely to be an issue as well.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X