Pre-screening Help

[dlowwa]

Would you see any issues with this aircraft photo? Photo was taken inside and I am looking to see if there are any issues with contrast, exposure, sharpness, and framing. Thank you.

A bit soft, and very borderline for contrast.

[bgkicks49]

Increased contrast and increased sharpness. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient to what your mentioned above. Thank you.



Also looking for feedback on these photos in regards to contrast, exposure, and if there are any issues with jpg compression. Thank you

[dlowwa]

Increased contrast and increased sharpness. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient to what your mentioned above.

Some areas look a little blown out, but otherwise would be ok for me.

Also looking for feedback on these photos in regards to contrast, exposure, and if there are any issues with jpg compression. Thank you

1. soft/blurry/heat haze
2. some vignetting on right side

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback on these two photos. Hoping exposure, contrast, and sharpness are all in line. Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Looking for feedback on these two photos. Hoping exposure, contrast, and sharpness are all in line. Thank you!

Maybe a bit soft on the second, but both would be ok for me.

[bgkicks49]

Any issues with these two photos in regards to color, contrast, exposure and horizon? Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Any issues with these two photos in regards to color, contrast, exposure and horizon? Thank you.

Borderline contrast on both, but would be ok for me.

[bgkicks49]

Any issues with this one? I am worried that there might be some issues with heat haze and exposure, but I wanted a second opinion. If there are any other issues that I did not mention or may have missed, I would appreciate it if you brought it to me attention. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Any issues with this one? I am worried that there might be some issues with heat haze and exposure, but I wanted a second opinion. If there are any other issues that I did not mention or may have missed, I would appreciate it if you brought it to me attention. Thank you.

Might need a little CW rotation, but otherwise should be ok.

[bgkicks49]

I would like to get your feedback on these photos.

1) Any issues with contrast and horizon?



2) Any issues with horizon, color and contrast?



3) Any issues with horizon and is the crop sufficient?



4) For this photo, is the crop sufficient and do you have any feedback as this is my first time attempting one of these unique types of photos.



Thank you for your assistance ahead of time! Appreciate all that you do!

[dlowwa]

I would like to get your feedback on these photos.

1) Any issues with contrast and horizon?



2) Any issues with horizon, color and contrast?



3) Any issues with horizon and is the crop sufficient?



4) For this photo, is the crop sufficient and do you have any feedback as this is my first time attempting one of these unique types of photos.



Thank you for your assistance ahead of time! Appreciate all that you do!

1-2 ok
3. crop ok, but some heat haze visible towards the nose
4. this kind of crop is subjective, but would be ok for me anyway

[bgkicks49]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to horizon, heat haze (if any), or exposure? Thanks for your assistance!

[dlowwa]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to horizon, heat haze (if any), or exposure? Thanks for your assistance!

Both look acceptable to me.

[bgkicks49]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to exposure, noise, and sharpness? Also would those items near it be considered obstructions?



So I had a previous rejection on a photo from the same sequence for bad composition and I wanted to make sure this photo wouldnt fall under the same category since it is framed the same way. It was ruled to low in frame. Would the way its framed with the tail and while as a reference for frame and equidistant spacing between the top/bottom and left/right?

[dlowwa]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to exposure, noise, and sharpness? Also would those items near it be considered obstructions?

Contrast maybe a bit weak, and nose area close to being blown out, but not really obstructed so should be ok on that count.

So I had a previous rejection on a photo from the same sequence for bad composition and I wanted to make sure this photo wouldnt fall under the same category since it is framed the same way. It was ruled to low in frame. Would the way its framed with the tail and while as a reference for frame and equidistant spacing between the top/bottom and left/right?

You'll want to leave as little space as possible between the tail and the top of the frame. This one might be acceptable.