Pre-screening Help

[dlowwa]

For photo #1 would it be safe to say that it would not be worth another photo or do you think that there is the off 'borderline' chance that this photo could become acceptable? In your professional opinion

With the right edit, I see it as possibly having a chance.

[bgkicks49]

1. yes, contrast is an issue.
2. horizon seems to be ok as best as I can tell

For photo #1 would it be safe to say that it would not be worth another photo or do you think that there is the off 'borderline' chance that this photo could become acceptable? In your professional opinion

[dlowwa]

Looking for feedback on these two photos.

1) Obviously will contrast be an issue for this photo? If you see anything else please let me know, but I believe exposure, white balance/color, and processing are all adequate and acceptable

2) Main issue I am worried about is horizon. I believe that using the building verticals is what's key since I cannot rely the electrical poles

If you see anything else that might cause a rejection, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention. Thank you very much in advance.

1. yes, contrast is an issue.
2. horizon seems to be ok as best as I can tell

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback on these two photos.

1) Obviously will contrast be an issue for this photo? If you see anything else please let me know, but I believe exposure, white balance/color, and processing are all adequate and acceptable



2) Main issue I am worried about is horizon. I believe that using the building verticals is what's key since I cannot rely the electrical poles



If you see anything else that might cause a rejection, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention. Thank you very much in advance.

[dlowwa]

Hello,

I recently got this rejection for Bad Info for not putting 'Elite Aviation' as the operator. Well 'Elite Aviation' exists in 'Airline' operator not 'General Aviation' so I opted to use 'Private' since the 'Elite Aviation' in the database has only airliners and business jets associated with it and this 'Elite Aviation' only employs the use of general aviation aircraft. Would like some insight on how to approach this since it would not allow me to add Elite Aviation into the General Aviation operator category. Thanks in advance

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9422483

This is the photo editing forum. You might want to post your question somewhere the editors can see it.

[bgkicks49]

Hello,

I recently got this rejection for Bad Info for not putting 'Elite Aviation' as the operator. Well 'Elite Aviation' exists in 'Airline' operator not 'General Aviation' so I opted to use 'Private' since the 'Elite Aviation' in the database has only airliners and business jets associated with it and this 'Elite Aviation' only employs the use of general aviation aircraft. Would like some insight on how to approach this since it would not allow me to add Elite Aviation into the General Aviation operator category. Thanks in advance

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9422483

[dlowwa]

Went to the National Airline Museum today in Kansas City and they had on display Harrison Fords crashed Ryan ST3KR (NC5317. I am wondering if this edited photo meets the parameters for JetPhotos in regards to: Exposure, Contrast, Framing and also to make sure it does not look over edited.

Also will I need to submit as NC53178 or N53178

and

Will this need to be categorized as Small Prop, Accident and/or Vintage/Warbird?

Thank you

Horizon and borderline dark/contrast. Yes to all categories.

[bgkicks49]

Went to the National Airline Museum today in Kansas City and they had on display Harrison Fords crashed Ryan ST3KR (NC5317. I am wondering if this edited photo meets the parameters for JetPhotos in regards to: Exposure, Contrast, Framing and also to make sure it does not look over edited.

Also will I need to submit as NC53178 or N53178

and

Will this need to be categorized as Small Prop, Accident and/or Vintage/Warbird?

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hello pre-screening crew,

Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to verticals/level horizon. I used the column at the center of the frame instead of the long building vertical because it made the image look lopsided. Would love to know if this photo is sufficient in being level or if there are adjustments to be made. Thanks in advance

Maybe a touch ccw needed, but I don't really see anything that tells me the horizon is badly off.

[bgkicks49]

Hello pre-screening crew,

Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to verticals/level horizon. I used the column at the center of the frame instead of the long building vertical because it made the image look lopsided. Would love to know if this photo is sufficient in being level or if there are adjustments to be made. Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

Good evening Dana and/or pre-screening crew. I am looking for some additional clarification with this photo that was recently rejected. And DISCLAIMER I have already appealed the photo but was left with even more questions as the rejection reason was vague in terms of the potential borderline issue. So the photo was rejected for "Bad Motive" and I appealed because the person in the photo had half their face blocked by their hat which therefore makes the face unrecognizable. And if the face is unrecognizable then it can't be determined a visible face. All I was told for appeal rejection reason was "Child Face. Please recrop or try different frame".... What about the child? Below is the link. Just looking to not be confused by this since the child's identity is blocked by the hat

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9346882

Image has already been appealed, and comments left. The child's face is an issue for motive. Not much more I can say.

[bgkicks49]

Good evening Dana and/or pre-screening crew. I am looking for some additional clarification with this photo that was recently rejected. And DISCLAIMER I have already appealed the photo but was left with even more questions as the rejection reason was vague in terms of the potential borderline issue. So the photo was rejected for "Bad Motive" and I appealed because the person in the photo had half their face blocked by their hat which therefore makes the face unrecognizable. And if the face is unrecognizable then it can't be determined a visible face. All I was told for appeal rejection reason was "Child Face. Please recrop or try different frame".... What about the child? Below is the link. Just looking to not be confused by this since the child's identity is blocked by the hat

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9346882

[dlowwa]

Thanks for that. I have added some contrast and sharpness to hopefully account for the issues that you brought to hand. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient or it made it look worse. Thank you.

Sharpness should be acceptable (for me anyway), but contrast (or color) likely still an issue.

[bgkicks49]

Thanks for that. I have added some contrast and sharpness to hopefully account for the issues that you brought to hand. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient or it made it look worse. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello pre-screening team, I am looking for feedback on this airport overview photo that I took when flying home a few days ago of Edwards Air Force Base. I am hoping that my contrast, exposure, and lighting are sufficient and also that there are not any issues with horizon or haze. I know that taking photos out of a plane window are all dependent on the state of the window with spots/scratches so I am hoping that this photo will meet all the criteria. Please let me know if you see any concerns and would love if you brought them to my attention. Thank you.

Cool photo, but there are issues with softness and especially contrast.