Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Hello,

    I recently got this rejection for Bad Info for not putting 'Elite Aviation' as the operator. Well 'Elite Aviation' exists in 'Airline' operator not 'General Aviation' so I opted to use 'Private' since the 'Elite Aviation' in the database has only airliners and business jets associated with it and this 'Elite Aviation' only employs the use of general aviation aircraft. Would like some insight on how to approach this since it would not allow me to add Elite Aviation into the General Aviation operator category. Thanks in advance

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9422483

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Went to the National Airline Museum today in Kansas City and they had on display Harrison Fords crashed Ryan ST3KR (NC5317. I am wondering if this edited photo meets the parameters for JetPhotos in regards to: Exposure, Contrast, Framing and also to make sure it does not look over edited.

    Also will I need to submit as NC53178 or N53178

    and

    Will this need to be categorized as Small Prop, Accident and/or Vintage/Warbird?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01678 NC53178 082521.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	1.63 MB
ID:	1122040
    Horizon and borderline dark/contrast. Yes to all categories.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Went to the National Airline Museum today in Kansas City and they had on display Harrison Fords crashed Ryan ST3KR (NC5317. I am wondering if this edited photo meets the parameters for JetPhotos in regards to: Exposure, Contrast, Framing and also to make sure it does not look over edited.

    Also will I need to submit as NC53178 or N53178

    and

    Will this need to be categorized as Small Prop, Accident and/or Vintage/Warbird?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01678 NC53178 082521.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	1.63 MB
ID:	1122040

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Hello pre-screening crew,

    Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to verticals/level horizon. I used the column at the center of the frame instead of the long building vertical because it made the image look lopsided. Would love to know if this photo is sufficient in being level or if there are adjustments to be made. Thanks in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01606-3 N235LL 081621.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	1.81 MB
ID:	1121406
    Maybe a touch ccw needed, but I don't really see anything that tells me the horizon is badly off.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Hello pre-screening crew,

    Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to verticals/level horizon. I used the column at the center of the frame instead of the long building vertical because it made the image look lopsided. Would love to know if this photo is sufficient in being level or if there are adjustments to be made. Thanks in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01606-3 N235LL 081621.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	1.81 MB
ID:	1121406

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Good evening Dana and/or pre-screening crew. I am looking for some additional clarification with this photo that was recently rejected. And DISCLAIMER I have already appealed the photo but was left with even more questions as the rejection reason was vague in terms of the potential borderline issue. So the photo was rejected for "Bad Motive" and I appealed because the person in the photo had half their face blocked by their hat which therefore makes the face unrecognizable. And if the face is unrecognizable then it can't be determined a visible face. All I was told for appeal rejection reason was "Child Face. Please recrop or try different frame".... What about the child? Below is the link. Just looking to not be confused by this since the child's identity is blocked by the hat

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9346882
    Image has already been appealed, and comments left. The child's face is an issue for motive. Not much more I can say.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Good evening Dana and/or pre-screening crew. I am looking for some additional clarification with this photo that was recently rejected. And DISCLAIMER I have already appealed the photo but was left with even more questions as the rejection reason was vague in terms of the potential borderline issue. So the photo was rejected for "Bad Motive" and I appealed because the person in the photo had half their face blocked by their hat which therefore makes the face unrecognizable. And if the face is unrecognizable then it can't be determined a visible face. All I was told for appeal rejection reason was "Child Face. Please recrop or try different frame".... What about the child? Below is the link. Just looking to not be confused by this since the child's identity is blocked by the hat

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9346882

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Thanks for that. I have added some contrast and sharpness to hopefully account for the issues that you brought to hand. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient or it made it look worse. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01028-2 KEDW 060621.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	773.5 KB
ID:	1117387
    Sharpness should be acceptable (for me anyway), but contrast (or color) likely still an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Thanks for that. I have added some contrast and sharpness to hopefully account for the issues that you brought to hand. Please let me know if these changes are sufficient or it made it look worse. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01028-2 KEDW 060621.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	773.5 KB
ID:	1117387

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Hello pre-screening team, I am looking for feedback on this airport overview photo that I took when flying home a few days ago of Edwards Air Force Base. I am hoping that my contrast, exposure, and lighting are sufficient and also that there are not any issues with horizon or haze. I know that taking photos out of a plane window are all dependent on the state of the window with spots/scratches so I am hoping that this photo will meet all the criteria. Please let me know if you see any concerns and would love if you brought them to my attention. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01028 KEDW 060621.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	705.1 KB
ID:	1117353
    Cool photo, but there are issues with softness and especially contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Hello pre-screening team, I am looking for feedback on this airport overview photo that I took when flying home a few days ago of Edwards Air Force Base. I am hoping that my contrast, exposure, and lighting are sufficient and also that there are not any issues with horizon or haze. I know that taking photos out of a plane window are all dependent on the state of the window with spots/scratches so I am hoping that this photo will meet all the criteria. Please let me know if you see any concerns and would love if you brought them to my attention. Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01028 KEDW 060621.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	705.1 KB
ID:	1117353

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on this photo. Having trouble with leveling the horizon because the vertical points are all over the place and not sure how to approach it. This is what I have come up with so far. Thanks for your help in advance. If you see any other issues with contrast, exposure or if the crop is questionable, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07539-3 44-61671 051221.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1117109
    Don't see anything that would tell me that the horizon is significantly off, so would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on this photo. Having trouble with leveling the horizon because the vertical points are all over the place and not sure how to approach it. This is what I have come up with so far. Thanks for your help in advance. If you see any other issues with contrast, exposure or if the crop is questionable, I would appreciate it if you brought it to my attention.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07539-3 44-61671 051221.jpg
Views:	101
Size:	1.42 MB
ID:	1117109

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback. In need of advice for this photo in regards to exposure, horizon, sharpness and color. Hoping that color/white balance are sufficient. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07515 N820SK 051021.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1115416
    Oversharpened, and the glare from the lights is somewhat distracting.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback. In need of advice for this photo in regards to exposure, horizon, sharpness and color. Hoping that color/white balance are sufficient. Thank you in advance for your assistance.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC07515 N820SK 051021.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1115416

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X