Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgkicks49
    replied
    These are the two fixes for horizon. Please let me know if the issues have been rectified! Thank you.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03332-2 GCIVV 011320.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	757.2 KB
ID:	1080284Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02054-2 CGERI 071719.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	734.0 KB
ID:	1080285

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for your thoughts on these photos.

    1) With sharpening and 1280px would heat haze be an issue with this photo?
    Borderline, but would be ok for me. Horizon also off.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    2) Any issues with compression on this photo?
    No, but soft, heathazed, and editing halos.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    3) Any issues with exposure or contrast?
    Yes, with both.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    4) Any color issues, horizon, contrast?
    Only horizon.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    5) Any issues with contrast, heat haze or horizon?
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for your thoughts on these photos.

    1) With sharpening and 1280px would heat haze be an issue with this photo?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC03332 GCIVV 011320.jpg Views:	0 Size:	758.7 KB ID:	1080219

    2) Any issues with compression on this photo?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC01254 N713CB 011020.jpg Views:	0 Size:	512.3 KB ID:	1080220

    3) Any issues with exposure or contrast?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC01825 EILBS 070919.jpg Views:	0 Size:	446.3 KB ID:	1080221

    4) Any color issues, horizon, contrast?

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC02054 CGERI 071719.jpg Views:	0 Size:	734.6 KB ID:	1080222

    5) Any issues with contrast, heat haze or horizon?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04769 N511DN 020520.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	536.9 KB
ID:	1080223

    Thank you! Any issues that I did not mention and you happen to catch, I would appreciate any further insight on these photos.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would like one more go at this one and I appreciate your patience with the matter.

    1) Decreased sliders to account for the editing halos that were visible before and worked on sharpness to make it less soft. I also adjusted for brightness/exposure. Please let me know if halos are visible as well as the sharpness of the photo.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	DSC03970-4 N43SF 020220.jpg Views:	0 Size:	527.1 KB ID:	1080058

    Please let me know what your thoughts are and I appreciate your help. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Appreciate the assistance on the previous photos. Here is a redo of #2 and #3. Made #2 4x3 to see if that would help with the compression issue and toned down the sliders on the photo to see if that could account for the over processed bits.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970-3 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	655.7 KB
ID:	1080008
    Halos still there, though much less than before. Soft, and borderline overexposed however.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    I wanted to see if I could salvage #3 as this would be a potential first reg and would appreciate your input to see if I could fix the contrast issues as well as the oversharpened issue. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329-3 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	450.6 KB
ID:	1080009
    Still almost certainly a contrast rejection, and possibly compression, though that could just be some sharpening artifacts I'm seeing.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Appreciate the assistance on the previous photos. Here is a redo of #2 and #3. Made #2 4x3 to see if that would help with the compression issue and toned down the sliders on the photo to see if that could account for the over processed bits.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970-3 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	655.7 KB
ID:	1080008

    I wanted to see if I could salvage #3 as this would be a potential first reg and would appreciate your input to see if I could fix the contrast issues as well as the oversharpened issue. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329-3 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	450.6 KB
ID:	1080009

    Again,

    Thank you for your assistance!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Are these re-edits any better than their previous versions? Thank you again for your help

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03898-2 N37404 020220.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	469.9 KB
ID:	1079988Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970-2 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	432.0 KB
ID:	1079989Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329-2 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	447.6 KB
ID:	1079990
    1. soft, contrast, compression, overprocessed
    2. overprocessed, compression
    3. borderline contrast/oversharpened noise

    I think only the second one has the quality to make further attempts worth the effort.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Are these re-edits any better than their previous versions? Thank you again for your help

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03898-2 N37404 020220.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	469.9 KB
ID:	1079988Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970-2 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	432.0 KB
ID:	1079989Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329-2 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	447.6 KB
ID:	1079990

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Could you provide some feedback on these photos? These are potential hot photos for paint scheme and first registration and would like your feedback. Thank you in advance.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	534.2 KB
ID:	1079958Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03898 N37404 020220.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	522.4 KB
ID:	1079959Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1079960
    1. borderline vignetting/overprocessed
    2. soft, overprocessed
    3. soft(tail), borderline contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Could you provide some feedback on these photos? These are potential hot photos for paint scheme and first registration and would like your feedback. Thank you in advance.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03970 N43SF 020220.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	534.2 KB
ID:	1079958Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03898 N37404 020220.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	522.4 KB
ID:	1079959Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04329 N179FE 020220.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	434.4 KB
ID:	1079960

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Would contrast be an issue with this photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03379 N313XA 020120.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	454.3 KB
ID:	1079911
    Yes it would.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Would contrast be an issue with this photo?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03379 N313XA 020120.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	454.3 KB
ID:	1079911

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Attempted to see if I could rectify the issues for this photo. This was pre-screened and it was determined that this had these issues: overprocessed, compression, borderline soft

    With this new edit, are these problems fixed? Thank you in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	371.7 KB
ID:	1079778
    I would reject it for contrast and compression. Compression either from a heavy crop, or poor editing.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Attempted to see if I could rectify the issues for this photo. This was pre-screened and it was determined that this had these issues: overprocessed, compression, borderline soft

    With this new edit, are these problems fixed? Thank you in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02108 N2946S 011220.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	371.7 KB
ID:	1079778

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    These aircrafts are already in the database

    The helicopter no longer has the DHL decal on it https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/8197322

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01835 N226NR 011220.jpg
Views:	133
Size:	766.5 KB
ID:	1079756

    The gulfstream no longer has the Caesars Palace emblem on the tail https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9261280

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02536-2 N168CE 011320.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	698.4 KB
ID:	1079757

    Would these photos be considered hot or not?
    Yes, both would qualify for hot screening.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X