Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Crop is ok for me, so that just comes down to personal taste. I do agree the quality is not quite there for 1600 pix. 1280 (or lower) would be a safer bet.
    Roger, thank you for your input. I will attempt one more time at a lower pixel size.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Good morning pre-screen team. I had previously posted a rejection link concerning the close-up of the Gulfstream G550. It was again rejected for soft and cut-off. I know that it was previously mentioned that crop was untidy so I tightened crop and exported at 1600px since it was also mentioned that there mightve been some haze. Would appreciate some input as to what else I would need to do or just scrap this pic altogether. Thanks in advance
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9092745
    Crop is ok for me, so that just comes down to personal taste. I do agree the quality is not quite there for 1600 pix. 1280 (or lower) would be a safer bet.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Good morning pre-screen team. I had previously posted a rejection link concerning the close-up of the Gulfstream G550. It was again rejected for soft and cut-off. I know that it was previously mentioned that crop was untidy so I tightened crop and exported at 1600px since it was also mentioned that there mightve been some haze. Would appreciate some input as to what else I would need to do or just scrap this pic altogether. Thanks in advance
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9092745

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post

    Would the slight halos cause a rejection Dana?
    Probably.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Exposure and centering look ok to me; slight haloing visible.
    Would the slight halos cause a rejection Dana?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    With this photo I am asking for advice/guidance on whether this fits the mold for an acceptable JP photo. Would this photo have any issues with being overprocessed? Also, does this have any issues with being underexposed and of course is the centering an issues.

    1) Overprocessed (any halos visible), Under-exposed, and centering

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05799 N92JQ 042421.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	451.1 KB
ID:	1114499

    Thank you in advance
    Exposure and centering look ok to me; slight haloing visible.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    With this photo I am asking for advice/guidance on whether this fits the mold for an acceptable JP photo. Would this photo have any issues with being overprocessed? Also, does this have any issues with being underexposed and of course is the centering an issues.

    1) Overprocessed (any halos visible), Under-exposed, and centering

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05799 N92JQ 042421.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	451.1 KB
ID:	1114499

    Thank you in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post

    So I went ahead and re-edited the photo to add a small amount of sharpness and tightened the crop just a smidge in order to eliminate the possibility of having too much dead space. Would this be a more favorable photo in terms of the 1920px ratio or would this be more ideal at a smaller px size?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01497-2 N866BB 040121.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1114281
    I would definitely try a lower resolution than 1920pix. I don't think you're going to be able to hide the softness/heat haze at 1920.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Someone's personal taste I guess. Crop is ok for me, maybe a bit 'untidy' but not enough for a rejection. I'd hazard a guess it would be ok for most of the crew as well, so I wouldn't fret about it too much.
    So I went ahead and re-edited the photo to add a small amount of sharpness and tightened the crop just a smidge in order to eliminate the possibility of having too much dead space. Would this be a more favorable photo in terms of the 1920px ratio or would this be more ideal at a smaller px size?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01497-2 N866BB 040121.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	1.33 MB
ID:	1114281

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Good afternoon pre-screening crew. I recently had a rejection that I would like some clarification on in regards to the 'cut-off' rejection. I know that certain cropping techniques can be perceived as subjective in terms of a photo being rejected or accepted and I wanted to get some specifics as to why this photo was rejected. I also know that I can fix the softness by potentially adding some sharpness.

    Below is the rejection link. Thank you in advance for your suggestions/insight.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9062205
    Someone's personal taste I guess. Crop is ok for me, maybe a bit 'untidy' but not enough for a rejection. I'd hazard a guess it would be ok for most of the crew as well, so I wouldn't fret about it too much.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Good afternoon pre-screening crew. I recently had a rejection that I would like some clarification on in regards to the 'cut-off' rejection. I know that certain cropping techniques can be perceived as subjective in terms of a photo being rejected or accepted and I wanted to get some specifics as to why this photo was rejected. I also know that I can fix the softness by potentially adding some sharpness.

    Below is the rejection link. Thank you in advance for your suggestions/insight.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9062205

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Hoping for some feedback on these photos respectively: Items listed if they are noticable and would warrant a rejection...If size of photo would be better at a lower Pixel size please let me know as well if that will help solve some of the issues

    1) Any issues with softness around the nose or the rear, overprocessed (editing halos visible), and if contrast is sufficient

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04677-2 N781MM 040921.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	620.1 KB
ID:	1113672

    2) overprocessed (editing halos visible near top side of fuselage and tail), exposure sufficient, and if there are any issues with vignette

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04759 N781KB 040921.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1113673

    Thank you in advance and look forward to hearing from you in regards to these photo pre-screening requests
    1. overprocessed and borderline noisy. sharpness & contrast ok for me.
    2. overprocessed, noisy, soft, borderline overexposed. not sure the quality is there for 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Hoping for some feedback on these photos respectively: Items listed if they are noticable and would warrant a rejection...If size of photo would be better at a lower Pixel size please let me know as well if that will help solve some of the issues

    1) Any issues with softness around the nose or the rear, overprocessed (editing halos visible), and if contrast is sufficient

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04677-2 N781MM 040921.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	620.1 KB
ID:	1113672

    2) overprocessed (editing halos visible near top side of fuselage and tail), exposure sufficient, and if there are any issues with vignette

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04759 N781KB 040921.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	1.05 MB
ID:	1113673

    Thank you in advance and look forward to hearing from you in regards to these photo pre-screening requests

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    1) with this photo, would this be an airport overview photo or would I use the aircraft (N148UP) as my upload process. Would the contrast and color be sufficient and are there any issues with exposure and horizon. If deemed airport overview, which category would you recommend for upload?
    Airport Overview - Runway. A bit noisy.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    2) with this photo I had one similar get accepted where it was stated that it could be considered backlit. Will this deem the photo as unacceptable? if not, are there any issues with color, contrast and exposure?
    Borderline backlit/contrast/exposure/soft

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    3) Any issues with exposure and contrast?
    No and yes, respectively, and also with noise and sharpening. Quality generally not good enough for 1920pix.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    So I went out night spotting yesterday evening and I was looking to get some feedback on these two photos.

    1) with this photo, would this be an airport overview photo or would I use the aircraft (N148UP) as my upload process. Would the contrast and color be sufficient and are there any issues with exposure and horizon. If deemed airport overview, which category would you recommend for upload?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00932 N148UP KMSP 032421.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1112486

    2) with this photo I had one similar get accepted where it was stated that it could be considered backlit. Will this deem the photo as unacceptable? if not, are there any issues with color, contrast and exposure?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00969 N801DM 032421.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	558.3 KB
ID:	1112487

    3) Any issues with exposure and contrast?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00731 N820EC 100920.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	892.9 KB
ID:	1112488

    Thank you very much in advance for your assistance

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X