Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Dana, I appreciate the feedback. Unfortunately I am receiving this error message when trying to upload this photo. Any insight as to why I am receiving this message when it says that the minimum size requirements are 576px for the short side?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CapturePIXELSIZE.PNG
Views:	69
Size:	13.9 KB
ID:	1105014
    Not sure.. that image is within the accepted size ratios. Other images are ok? Maybe try the same image at a different resolution?

    Comment


    • This one was a bit puzzling to me and I am looking for a bit more of an explanation before I appealed officially. I was hoping to get a more clear explanation as to which parts of the photo are over/undersaturated. I white balanced like I normally would and set vibrance and saturation low like I have done with my past photos. Any further advice/constructive feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8711893

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
        This one was a bit puzzling to me and I am looking for a bit more of an explanation before I appealed officially. I was hoping to get a more clear explanation as to which parts of the photo are over/undersaturated. I white balanced like I normally would and set vibrance and saturation low like I have done with my past photos. Any further advice/constructive feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance.

        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8711893
        There's a slight red tint, but would have been ok for me.

        Comment


        • Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, exposure, sharpness/soft, and if there is any visible heat haze. Taking a chance with this photo, but I would appreciate a second opinion. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays and we appreciate everything that you do! Cheers!

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03964 9H-VJH 112820.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	309.9 KB
ID:	1105674

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
            Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, exposure, sharpness/soft, and if there is any visible heat haze. Taking a chance with this photo, but I would appreciate a second opinion. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays and we appreciate everything that you do! Cheers!

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03964 9H-VJH 112820.jpg
Views:	55
Size:	309.9 KB
ID:	1105674
            Angle seems a bit steep, no? Pretty sure you'd get a stall with that AOA.. Quality looks mostly acceptable otherwise.

            Comment


            • Would this be an acceptable photo for JP? I am looking for guidance as to whether the color is sufficient, contrast is good enough, and if there are any soft or undersharpened areas of the photo. If there are any other aspects that I missed, I would appreciate you bringing it to my attention. Thank you.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03227 07-08743 082620.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1106416

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                Would this be an acceptable photo for JP? I am looking for guidance as to whether the color is sufficient, contrast is good enough, and if there are any soft or undersharpened areas of the photo. If there are any other aspects that I missed, I would appreciate you bringing it to my attention. Thank you.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03227 07-08743 082620.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1106416
                Looks a bit soft, but otherwise ok for me.

                Comment


                • So I wanted to wait until I got the rejection email to see if there were any screener comments concerning which parts of the photo were soft after I took your advice Dana and applied additional USM to the photo that you provided feedback on in the most recent post in this thread. Looking for guidance as to which aspect of the photo is soft and if there are any tips/suggestions you can provide before I officially appeal through the proper channels. I really thought with my additional sharpening that it would make it more acceptable, but clearly it did not, and that is why I am reaching out. Just looking for some clarity and thank you in advance.

                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8778471

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                    So I wanted to wait until I got the rejection email to see if there were any screener comments concerning which parts of the photo were soft after I took your advice Dana and applied additional USM to the photo that you provided feedback on in the most recent post in this thread. Looking for guidance as to which aspect of the photo is soft and if there are any tips/suggestions you can provide before I officially appeal through the proper channels. I really thought with my additional sharpening that it would make it more acceptable, but clearly it did not, and that is why I am reaching out. Just looking for some clarity and thank you in advance.

                    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8778471
                    Not sure why you would appeal.. I told you it was still soft.. but that's your call. Big hints are the fine details all look soft (serial, titles, around cockpit). If you want an idea of how fixable it may (or may not) be, post a 100% crop of one of those areas.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X