Pre-screening Help

[bgkicks49]

Good afternoon pre-screening crew. I recently had a rejection that I would like some clarification on in regards to the 'cut-off' rejection. I know that certain cropping techniques can be perceived as subjective in terms of a photo being rejected or accepted and I wanted to get some specifics as to why this photo was rejected. I also know that I can fix the softness by potentially adding some sharpness.

Below is the rejection link. Thank you in advance for your suggestions/insight.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9062205

[dlowwa]

Hoping for some feedback on these photos respectively: Items listed if they are noticable and would warrant a rejection...If size of photo would be better at a lower Pixel size please let me know as well if that will help solve some of the issues

1) Any issues with softness around the nose or the rear, overprocessed (editing halos visible), and if contrast is sufficient



2) overprocessed (editing halos visible near top side of fuselage and tail), exposure sufficient, and if there are any issues with vignette



Thank you in advance and look forward to hearing from you in regards to these photo pre-screening requests

1. overprocessed and borderline noisy. sharpness & contrast ok for me.
2. overprocessed, noisy, soft, borderline overexposed. not sure the quality is there for 1920pix.

[bgkicks49]

Hoping for some feedback on these photos respectively: Items listed if they are noticable and would warrant a rejection...If size of photo would be better at a lower Pixel size please let me know as well if that will help solve some of the issues

1) Any issues with softness around the nose or the rear, overprocessed (editing halos visible), and if contrast is sufficient



2) overprocessed (editing halos visible near top side of fuselage and tail), exposure sufficient, and if there are any issues with vignette



Thank you in advance and look forward to hearing from you in regards to these photo pre-screening requests

[dlowwa]

1) with this photo, would this be an airport overview photo or would I use the aircraft (N148UP) as my upload process. Would the contrast and color be sufficient and are there any issues with exposure and horizon. If deemed airport overview, which category would you recommend for upload?

Airport Overview - Runway. A bit noisy.

2) with this photo I had one similar get accepted where it was stated that it could be considered backlit. Will this deem the photo as unacceptable? if not, are there any issues with color, contrast and exposure?

Borderline backlit/contrast/exposure/soft

3) Any issues with exposure and contrast?

No and yes, respectively, and also with noise and sharpening. Quality generally not good enough for 1920pix.

[bgkicks49]

So I went out night spotting yesterday evening and I was looking to get some feedback on these two photos.

1) with this photo, would this be an airport overview photo or would I use the aircraft (N148UP) as my upload process. Would the contrast and color be sufficient and are there any issues with exposure and horizon. If deemed airport overview, which category would you recommend for upload?



2) with this photo I had one similar get accepted where it was stated that it could be considered backlit. Will this deem the photo as unacceptable? if not, are there any issues with color, contrast and exposure?



3) Any issues with exposure and contrast?



Thank you very much in advance for your assistance

[bgkicks49]

I wasn't involved, but most likely because it is too dark. FR24 prefers the whole aircraft/livery to be seen easily.

Ah, okay. Understandable. I was just looking for an explanation. Thank you Dana

[dlowwa]

Hello forum crew. I was going through some photos of mine and was curious as to why this particular photo has been excluded from FR24?

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9975238

I wasn't involved, but most likely because it is too dark. FR24 prefers the whole aircraft/livery to be seen easily.

[bgkicks49]

Hello forum crew. I was going through some photos of mine and was curious as to why this particular photo has been excluded from FR24?

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9975238

[dlowwa]

So this is my first attempt at photography from an aircraft and I would like to know if this photo meets the standards for JP for an airport photo.

I'd say probably not: too many soft spots, and the contrast is not great, though the latter is not really your fault.

[bgkicks49]

So this is my first attempt at photography from an aircraft and I would like to know if this photo meets the standards for JP for an airport photo. In terms of exposure, sharpness, and contrast, does this meet the standards? Also, would there be an issue with color/hue? Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

For this photo, are there any issues that you see with softness/haze as well as contrast and exposure? Also, is framing sufficient? Thank you

Borderline for haze, yes. Can see it a bit on the nose, and for sure on the mlg.

[bgkicks49]

For this photo, are there any issues that you see with softness/haze as well as contrast and exposure? Also, is framing sufficient? Thank you

[dlowwa]

With this photo, I am looking for feedback on whether the horizon is level and if there is any prominent haze that will render this photo rejected. Thank you in advance.

Horizon looks ok to me. Haze is somewhat noticeable.

[bgkicks49]

With this photo, I am looking for feedback on whether the horizon is level and if there is any prominent haze that will render this photo rejected. Thank you in advance.

[dlowwa]

Thank you for the feedback Dana, in terms of suggested rotation for horizon would you suggest CW or CCW?

At least 0.5 degrees CW.