Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29476[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29477[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29478[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29479[/ATTACH]

    Any visible issues with these photos?
    1. borderline oversharpened/contrast/overprocessed
    2. dirty
    3. ok
    4. overprocessed

    Comment


    • For #4, which aspect of the photo is overprocessed? Sharpening? Color? Contrast? Thank you.
      http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
        For #4, which aspect of the photo is overprocessed? Sharpening? Color? Contrast? Thank you.
        Editing halos visible.

        Comment


        • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03430-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	427.7 KB
ID:	1043504

          Any better with this photo? Decreased the shadow and highlight sliders to attempt to eliminate the editing halos
          http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

          Comment


          • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
            [ATTACH=CONFIG]29507[/ATTACH]

            Any better with this photo? Decreased the shadow and highlight sliders to attempt to eliminate the editing halos
            No halos visible.

            Comment


            • Thank you! Also, are all other aspects of the photo satisfactory and up to the screener standards?
              http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

              Comment


              • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                Thank you! Also, are all other aspects of the photo satisfactory and up to the screener standards?
                I'd consider it borderline dark/soft, but passable for me.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                  Thank you dlowwa for your feedback! This helps so much!
                  Are you using a Nikon D3400? That body often tints photos blue/green.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by NZDN_spotting View Post
                    Are you using a Nikon D3400? That body often tints photos blue/green.
                    I am using a Sony RX10 M3
                    http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                    Comment


                    • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08506.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	297.2 KB
ID:	1043505Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05204.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	318.9 KB
ID:	1043506Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03172.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	600.4 KB
ID:	1043507

                      What would be your consensus with these photos? Thanks in advance for your feedback.
                      http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                        [ATTACH=CONFIG]29510[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29511[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29512[/ATTACH]

                        What would be your consensus with these photos? Thanks in advance for your feedback.
                        Borderline soft all 3, slight green/blue tint on the second two.

                        Comment


                        • 1-2 too soft
                          3 should be ok

                          Comment


                          • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05204-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	337.1 KB
ID:	1043512Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08506-2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	303.9 KB
ID:	1043513

                            Increased sharpness, increased the sharpness detail and decreased the sharpness masking. Would you still consider them soft?
                            http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                              [ATTACH=CONFIG]29521[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]29522[/ATTACH]

                              Increased sharpness, increased the sharpness detail and decreased the sharpness masking. Would you still consider them soft?
                              Both would be acceptable for me, but first might still be borderline for others.

                              Comment


                              • Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05204-3.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	349.8 KB
ID:	1043514

                                Would this be more acceptable?
                                http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X