Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Isolated the area and increased sharpness just a bit more to see if it would fix the softness issues. Please advise if this would still be a potential issue/rejection. Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05556-4 N172FE 020920.jpg
Views:	180
Size:	568.0 KB
ID:	1080504
    http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
      Isolated the area and increased sharpness just a bit more to see if it would fix the softness issues. Please advise if this would still be a potential issue/rejection. Thank you

      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05556-4 N172FE 020920.jpg
Views:	180
Size:	568.0 KB
ID:	1080504
      Don't see a huge difference. Last time I will comment on this one.

      Comment


      • JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


        Had a recent rejection for Dark/Underexposed and for unlevel horizon.

        Would like to see if this photo has fixed these issues? Thank you

        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05638 N227VR 021020.jpg
Views:	177
Size:	543.4 KB
ID:	1080558
        http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

        Comment


        • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7906052

          Had a recent rejection for Dark/Underexposed and for unlevel horizon.

          Would like to see if this photo has fixed these issues? Thank you

          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05638 N227VR 021020.jpg
Views:	177
Size:	543.4 KB
ID:	1080558
          Horizon is OK now, but to be honest, I prefer the exposure on the rejected photo. But that's a personal call.
          My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

          Comment


          • Do you see any issues with these photos?

            1) Any contrast, heat haze, or exposure issues?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03230-2 N287AK 011320.jpg
Views:	178
Size:	672.5 KB
ID:	1080638

            2) Any issues with horizon and exposure?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05485 PHHSK 020920.jpg
Views:	177
Size:	471.0 KB
ID:	1080639
            http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
              Do you see any issues with these photos?

              1) Any contrast, heat haze, or exposure issues?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03230-2 N287AK 011320.jpg
Views:	178
Size:	672.5 KB
ID:	1080638

              2) Any issues with horizon and exposure?

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05485 PHHSK 020920.jpg
Views:	177
Size:	471.0 KB
ID:	1080639
              Hi, please read #6 here:

              https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

              Thanks.

              Comment


              • Apologies for that. Here are the correct images for screening.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03230-2 N287AK 011320.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	843.8 KB
ID:	1080689Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05485 PHHSK 020920.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	560.9 KB
ID:	1080690
                http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                Comment


                • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                  Apologies for that. Here are the correct images for screening.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03230-2 N287AK 011320.jpg
Views:	156
Size:	843.8 KB
ID:	1080689Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05485 PHHSK 020920.jpg
Views:	144
Size:	560.9 KB
ID:	1080690
                  1. heat haze borderline. exposure ok.
                  2. horizon & exposure ok

                  Comment


                  • Thank you for the feedback. I just realized that the photo for PH-HSK was already in the queue when I submitted it for pre-screening. I apologize for that and it will not happen again.
                    http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                    Comment


                    • Could you pre-screen these two photos?

                      1) Looking to see if there are any heat haze, contrast, or sharpness issues

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06351 N865DA 021420.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	290.8 KB
ID:	1080784

                      2) Please let me know if there are any issues with contrast, halos, and centering

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05935 N46RF 021020.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	377.3 KB
ID:	1080785

                      Thank you
                      http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                        Could you pre-screen these two photos?

                        1) Looking to see if there are any heat haze, contrast, or sharpness issues

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06351 N865DA 021420.jpg
Views:	149
Size:	290.8 KB
ID:	1080784
                        Yes to all three, and also vignetting.

                        Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                        2) Please let me know if there are any issues with contrast, halos, and centering

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05935 N46RF 021020.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	377.3 KB
ID:	1080785

                        Thank you
                        Centering maybe a bit low, no halos/contrast issues, but soft towards the tail and some vignetting in top corners.

                        Comment


                        • Checked the other photos in the sequence of the NOAA aircraft and this one, I believe, is the only one that did not have any vignette in the corner. Could you please provide your thoughts on this updated photo of N46RF? Thank you.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05915 N46RF 021020.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	356.4 KB
ID:	1080917
                          http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                            Checked the other photos in the sequence of the NOAA aircraft and this one, I believe, is the only one that did not have any vignette in the corner. Could you please provide your thoughts on this updated photo of N46RF? Thank you.

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC05915 N46RF 021020.jpg
Views:	130
Size:	356.4 KB
ID:	1080917
                            Vignetting still visible; borderline whether it's enough to cause a rejection.

                            Comment


                            • Looking for feedback on this photo. Primarily looking to see if there are any contrast issues, exposure issues, and if you see any heat haze. While editing, it wanted to add a lot of contrast and made the image too dark, wanted to see if the not so drastic contrast on this photo is sufficient for JP standards. Thank you

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06074 961007 021020.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	859.2 KB
ID:	1081031
                              http://www.jetphotos.com/jp_forum_si...hotogid=149565

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
                                Looking for feedback on this photo. Primarily looking to see if there are any contrast issues, exposure issues, and if you see any heat haze. While editing, it wanted to add a lot of contrast and made the image too dark, wanted to see if the not so drastic contrast on this photo is sufficient for JP standards. Thank you

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC06074 961007 021020.jpg
Views:	160
Size:	859.2 KB
ID:	1081031
                                Slightly dark/low contrast, but should be fixable.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X