Pre-screening Help

[dlowwa]

Looking for advice on a couple of photos that could be considered borderline at best, but need a screeners opinion on the matter

1) with the low shutter speed, making sure there are not any soft or blurry spots and to make sure it is fully level

2) contrast is the main concern I have as well as making sure the edit is not over-edited/overprocessed with the current edit and if there might be any soft spots

1. yes, soft/blurry - especially towards the nose
2. heat hazed/soft, and yes poor contrast

[bgkicks49]

Looking for advice on a couple of photos that could be considered borderline at best, but need a screeners opinion on the matter

1) with the low shutter speed, making sure there are not any soft or blurry spots and to make sure it is fully level



2) contrast is the main concern I have as well as making sure the edit is not over-edited/overprocessed with the current edit and if there might be any soft spots

[dlowwa]

Should be ok now, I just added it.

[dlowwa]

Dana or Alex, I recently submitted a photo yesterday that was going through screening as a new registration, N77DJ, a Cirrus vision SF50.

It shows it was rejected but it's not showing up in my rejected photos list, I do not have a photo ID for this photo, because it just completely disappeared. It's not showing up in my photos and it's not showing up and rejected photos. I'm trying to figure out what my next steps are in this predicament.

Hopefully somebody can help me find my photo. Thanks

Could be a system bug, which happens sometimes. If it hasn't appeared on the DB already, just reupload it.

[bgkicks49]

Dana or Alex, I recently submitted a photo yesterday that was going through screening as a new registration, N77DJ, a Cirrus vision SF50.

It shows it was rejected but it's not showing up in my rejected photos list, I do not have a photo ID for this photo, because it just completely disappeared. It's not showing up in my photos and it's not showing up and rejected photos. I'm trying to figure out what my next steps are in this predicament.

Hopefully somebody can help me find my photo. Thanks

[dlowwa]

Is #2 fixable? Which areas are soft/blurry and I'm guessing it needs CW rotation?

If you have a non-blurry version, yes, fixable. Buildings are leaning right, needs CCW rotation.

[bgkicks49]

1. contrast, blurry. not fixable
2. blurry, horizon

Is #2 fixable? Which areas are soft/blurry and I'm guessing it needs CW rotation?

[dlowwa]

Looking for feedback: I know there are some borderline and questionable things that might be with these photos. Need a second opinion please and thank you

If you see any other issues please let me know, thank you!

1. contrast, blurry. not fixable
2. blurry, horizon

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback: I know there are some borderline and questionable things that might be with these photos. Need a second opinion please and thank you

1) any issues with any grain that would make it unusable, contrast issues (it looks borderline to me), any soft or blurry areas?



2) exposure/grain issues, horizon, and contrast issues



If you see any other issues please let me know, thank you!

[dlowwa]

Looking for feedback on this photo. I worry that there might be some softness in the photo while applying my usual sharpness settings. Please do let me know if there are any other issues with the photo. Thank you.

Also if you are able to provide feedback on the operator, this aircraft is operated by CHRISTIANSEN AVIATION, but there are Tulsa Community College markings, not sure which one to go with for operator

Yes, probably too soft. Should be uploaded with the operator as the airline.

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback on this photo. I worry that there might be some softness in the photo while applying my usual sharpness settings. Please do let me know if there are any other issues with the photo. Thank you.

Also if you are able to provide feedback on the operator, this aircraft is operated by CHRISTIANSEN AVIATION, but there are Tulsa Community College markings, not sure which one to go with for operator

Thank you in advance

[dlowwa]

Taking advice and guidance from the both of you (thank you for that by the way) I have come up with this edit. I realize that the underside of the aircraft was not well lit and the upper fuselage blended into the overcast background. I went back and did a re-edit so that I was not working with what I had before and this is what I came up with earlier. I will take this as my last chance/last advice for this photo. Please let me know what you think.

As before, borderline (at best) for contrast.

[bgkicks49]

Taking advice and guidance from the both of you (thank you for that by the way) I have come up with this edit. I realize that the underside of the aircraft was not well lit and the upper fuselage blended into the overcast background. I went back and did a re-edit so that I was not working with what I had before and this is what I came up with earlier. I will take this as my last chance/last advice for this photo. Please let me know what you think.

[pdeboer]

Tried not to overdo it, but added some contrast to the photo in terms of adding highlights and decreasing shadows. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks

Contrast is still an issue. The problem is that the part of the a/c we look at is not well lit and (part of it) blends into the background.

[bgkicks49]

With the right edit, I see it as possibly having a chance.

Tried not to overdo it, but added some contrast to the photo in terms of adding highlights and decreasing shadows. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks