Pre-screening Help

[dlowwa]

Any issues with contrast or exposure? Another one of those where the histogram bell does not look like it normally does, but the highlights are not blown out, just need a second opinion. Thank you.

Very light halos visible, but otherwise should be acceptable.

[bgkicks49]

Any issues with contrast or exposure? Another one of those where the histogram bell does not look like it normally does, but the highlights are not blown out, just need a second opinion. Thank you.

[LX-A343]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, color, or exposure? Thank you

Maybe a touch soft, but I would accept it.

[bgkicks49]

Would there be any issues with this photo in regards to contrast, color, or exposure? Thank you

[LX-A343]

Looking for feedback on this photo. Had some trouble with the histogram "bell" shape and was wondering if there are any contrast issues with this photo? Along with contrast, I am worried about the exposure since the histogram did not look like a normal/typical histogram that I usually see. Feedback would be greatly appreciated thank you. If there are other aspects of the photo that I may have missed, please let me know.

Looks OK for me

[bgkicks49]

Looking for feedback on this photo. Had some trouble with the histogram "bell" shape and was wondering if there are any contrast issues with this photo? Along with contrast, I am worried about the exposure since the histogram did not look like a normal/typical histogram that I usually see. Feedback would be greatly appreciated thank you. If there are other aspects of the photo that I may have missed, please let me know.

[dlowwa]

I will surely be able to rectify the contrast/dark issue, potentially, but with the possible backlit rejection, the sun was at my back and is shining clearly on the angle of the planes visible to me/camera angle (in my opinion) especially if you were to look at the tails of the aircraft in formation. For the backlit rejection would that mainly be an issue with 'plane in own shadow' backlit versus actual backlit?

Correct. 95% of what we see in this image is in shadow. It would be a rejection for me, and I would guess most other screeners as well.

[bgkicks49]

I will surely be able to rectify the contrast/dark issue, potentially, but with the possible backlit rejection, the sun was at my back and is shining clearly on the angle of the planes visible to me/camera angle (in my opinion) especially if you were to look at the tails of the aircraft in formation. For the backlit rejection would that mainly be an issue with 'plane in own shadow' backlit versus actual backlit? Just looking for clarification if it will even be worth a second attempt on this photo. It was very spur of the moment as they flew over and would appreciate your insight into the backlit issue. Thank you

[dlowwa]

I am worried that this shot will be affected by contrast as well as angle of lighting. Any visible issues that you may see with this photo?

Yes, very likely a contrast/dark, or even backlit rejection.

[bgkicks49]

I am worried that this shot will be affected by contrast as well as angle of lighting. Any visible issues that you may see with this photo?

[dlowwa]

Since there isn't much I can do in ways of vignette, I have fixed the ratio and crop of the B744 photo. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you.

Ratio is within allowable limits now.

[bgkicks49]

Since there isn't much I can do in ways of vignette, I have fixed the ratio and crop of the B744 photo. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Fixed the two that I could fix, please let me know if these fixes are sufficient

1. cropping/ratio
2. borderline vignetting (top right)

[bgkicks49]

Fixed the two that I could fix, please let me know if these fixes are sufficient

[dlowwa]

1) Any issues with jpeg compression, contrast, and overprocessed?

No, only heat haze.

2) Any issues with softness or contrast?

No, only vignetting and overprocessing.

3) Any issues with contrast, overprocessed, and softness?

Yes on overprocessed.