Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Besides the fixes needed for the photo itself, there is a new airline sticker that now shows it as under Endeavor Air operation instead of the "operated by gojet airlines" (below cockpit window and right of door). Based off that change, yet subtle, I would assume this would fall under hot
    I think I can see it, but basically when screening such minor changes, if we have to look really hard to find the change, pretty good chance we'll just reject for Invalid Hot. Basically anything that takes more than 5 seconds to spot is wasting our time, and not such an important change that it needs to be hot.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Besides the fixes needed for the photo itself, there is a new airline sticker that now shows it as under Endeavor Air operation instead of the "operated by gojet airlines" (below cockpit window and right of door). Based off that change, yet subtle, I would assume this would fall under hot

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to color and exposure.
    WB slightly warm, but nearly ok. Exposure ok. Might need a little CCW.

    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Also, this aircraft changes regional airlines from Delta Connection (GoJet Airlines) to Delta Connection (Endeavor Air). Does this count as a hot photo if a new airline operates this aircraft for Delta?
    Has there been a visible change to the livery?

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on this photo in regards to color and exposure. Also, this aircraft changes regional airlines from Delta Connection (GoJet Airlines) to Delta Connection (Endeavor Air). Does this count as a hot photo if a new airline operates this aircraft for Delta?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01221 N376CA 101020.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	487.0 KB
ID:	1101378

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Dana, I do appreciate that. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    So I got a rejection that I was puzzled about since the verticals of the beams and garage door frame were all straight up and down. The screener who screened it suggested CCW rotation and I can see what they're talking about, but I leveled it off the beams on the left and I'm the distance directly behind the aircraft. Looking for a second opinion before I appeal. Thank you.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8549359
    Yeah, I'm going to add that one for you. Conflicting vertical references, and seems you did the best you could so will give it a pass since it's a new reg.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    So I got a rejection that I was puzzled about since the verticals of the beams and garage door frame were all straight up and down. The screener who screened it suggested CCW rotation and I can see what they're talking about, but I leveled it off the beams on the left and I'm the distance directly behind the aircraft. Looking for a second opinion before I appeal. Thank you.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8549359

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on this photo:

    1) Is contrast sufficiently borderline, exposure good enough and if the photos horizon is level.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01695-2 N401YX 101820.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	584.0 KB
ID:	1100887

    Thank you.
    Would be a contrast and probably soft/blurry rejection for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on this photo:

    1) Is contrast sufficiently borderline, exposure good enough and if the photos horizon is level.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01695-2 N401YX 101820.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	584.0 KB
ID:	1100887

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Tweaked photo curves to increase contrast and added some exposure to brighten it up. Please let me know if these tweaks are sufficient or if there is a bit more work needed. Thanks in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01825-2 EI-LBS 070919.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	412.0 KB
ID:	1100817
    Still borderline at best for contrast, imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Tweaked photo curves to increase contrast and added some exposure to brighten it up. Please let me know if these tweaks are sufficient or if there is a bit more work needed. Thanks in advance

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01825-2 EI-LBS 070919.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	412.0 KB
ID:	1100817

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Playing to safe and asking for a second opinion on this photo from last summer.

    Main Concerns: Contrast, Exposure, Crop and if there is any visible vignette

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01825 EI-LBS 070919.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	422.8 KB
ID:	1100812

    Thanks in advance
    Contrast and exposure are indeed a bit borderline. I would surely give it a try at tweaking the curves in your photo editor.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Playing to safe and asking for a second opinion on this photo from last summer.

    Main Concerns: Contrast, Exposure, Crop and if there is any visible vignette

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC01825 EI-LBS 070919.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	422.8 KB
ID:	1100812

    Thanks in advance

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by bgkicks49 View Post
    Looking for feedback on these two photos.

    1) any issues with softness, exposure, and if the aircraft is centered properly

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09686 N656UA 100220.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	376.4 KB
ID:	1100641

    2) with this business jet, looking for feedback on if there is any vignette, exposure is sufficient, and if there are any issues with overprocessed/oversaturation

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09539 N89LD 092420.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	348.5 KB
ID:	1100642
    1. centering and exposure are ok
    2. yes vignetting is visible, but exposure and processing should be fine

    Leave a comment:


  • bgkicks49
    replied
    Looking for feedback on these two photos.

    1) any issues with softness, exposure, and if the aircraft is centered properly

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09686 N656UA 100220.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	376.4 KB
ID:	1100641

    2) with this business jet, looking for feedback on if there is any vignette, exposure is sufficient, and if there are any issues with overprocessed/oversaturation

    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC09539 N89LD 092420.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	348.5 KB
ID:	1100642

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X