Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening - NorthStarDC4M

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Question:

    I've had 2 shots rejected for being low in frame on ERJ-170/175s... looking at pics in the database most sidelines on this type seem to be very high in frame with the centerline below the wing top... Can someone provide some guidance on this type what the screeners are seeing differently seemingly?

    Leave a comment:


  • jakew04
    replied
    well done, it's a great shot

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Well I just want to thank everyone for the advice given... thanks to all that great support this shot made the top 4 yesterday:

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9416807

    Leave a comment:


  • CrosswindPhoto
    replied
    shouldn't, I like it.
    I think it adds to the image in a certain way.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by northstardc4m View Post
    Are the birds a no go for this?
    Birds should not be an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Are the birds a no go for this?

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    Heat haze is noticeable, and wrong color profile (use sRGB, not ProPhoto).
    Must of ticked that box by accident, and I guess ill have to drop C-GWKW.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by northstardc4m View Post
    and I know this one is borderline at best... but it's a new type for reg, passable or fixable or no?
    Heat haze is noticeable, and wrong color profile (use sRGB, not ProPhoto).

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Ok a couple new ones...




    and I know this one is borderline at best... but it's a new type for reg, passable or fixable or no?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by northstardc4m View Post
    Is this now "dirt free"?

    Looks ok to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Is this now "dirt free"?

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    I'm confused about 4 and 5 being dirty but I'll check again... my eyes are not as good as they used to be. Though if 4 looks overprocessed then I'll probably abandon that shot since I did very little processing to it. I have a run of others for it.

    1 the horizon... The building I used is cropped out but I'll switch to a different shot in that set if it looks off.

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by northstardc4m View Post
    How do those look?
    1. horizon
    2-3 ok
    4. overprocessed, dirty
    5. dirty, but not easy to see so might not be an issue

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Actually forget those... new day new settings better light better location:











    How do those look?

    Leave a comment:


  • northstardc4m
    replied
    Ok... C-FMZR fixed:



    and a new one from today?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X