Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

(arora7dm) - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6088.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	463.5 KB
ID:	1105591 Thank you again. Giving up on these last 3 and instead these new ones. Please let me know the thinking.. Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6154.jpg Views:	0 Size:	531.7 KB ID:	1105587Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6124.jpg Views:	0 Size:	490.8 KB ID:	1105588Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6130.jpg Views:	0 Size:	965.2 KB ID:	1105589Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6141.jpg Views:	0 Size:	970.7 KB ID:	1105590

    Comment


    • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
      Thank you again. Giving up on these last 3 and instead these new ones. Please let me know the thinking..
      1. vignetting, dirty
      2-3. vignetting
      4. borderline soft
      5. ok for me

      4-5 also have some vignetting, but it's much less noticeable against that kind of background.

      Comment


      • Yes, this vignetting is a consistent issue as all of my images seem to have it. In particular, this Sigma 100-400 lens combination with a FX sensor. Based on the suggestion from dlowwa on this thread, https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...35#post1103335
        I am going to use f11 or higher in the future. And I am going to try the DX mode in my camera to see if that helps too. I think it should help, but cannot find any proof on it, on the web. Anyway, I tried to fix some of the images (though 1-3 may go into over-processing issue), please let me know thoughts. Also added a few new images. Thank you.

        One quick question - in my mind the difference between borderline soft (actually anything like contrast, horizon etc.) vs. soft is that former can be fixed by proper editing, while latter cannot. Is that right thinking?

        Thank you as always.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6088.jpg
Views:	122
Size:	461.1 KB
ID:	1105633Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6124.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	489.1 KB
ID:	1105634Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6134.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	918.4 KB
ID:	1105635Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6203.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	584.7 KB
ID:	1105636Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6144.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	921.7 KB
ID:	1105637

        Comment


        • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
          Yes, this vignetting is a consistent issue as all of my images seem to have it. In particular, this Sigma 100-400 lens combination with a FX sensor. Based on the suggestion from dlowwa on this thread, https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...35#post1103335
          I am going to use f11 or higher in the future. And I am going to try the DX mode in my camera to see if that helps too. I think it should help, but cannot find any proof on it, on the web. Anyway, I tried to fix some of the images (though 1-3 may go into over-processing issue), please let me know thoughts. Also added a few new images.
          1-2. vignetting
          3 & 5. borderline soft
          4. centering

          Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
          One quick question - in my mind the difference between borderline soft (actually anything like contrast, horizon etc.) vs. soft is that former can be fixed by proper editing, while latter cannot. Is that right thinking?
          No, borderline simply means it may or may not be accepted. Not 'borderline' means it certainly won't be accepted.

          Comment


          • Thank you. These are the last few ones from this set. Please let me know thoughts and Merry Christmas!! Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6097.jpg
Views:	88
Size:	722.6 KB
ID:	1105707Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6111.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	868.5 KB
ID:	1105708Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6058.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	807.7 KB
ID:	1105709Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6160.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	870.5 KB
ID:	1105710Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6164.jpg
Views:	85
Size:	988.6 KB
ID:	1105711

            Comment


            • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
              Thank you. These are the last few ones from this set. Please let me know thoughts and Merry Christmas!!
              1 and 5 seem to have some vignetting, 2 and 3 centering, 4 dark.

              Comment


              • Click image for larger version

Name:	NZ6_6088_00001_01.jpg
Views:	76
Size:	403.0 KB
ID:	1105745 Thank you for the review! Please see adjusted images for all but the 1st one. Also, the Ana one I had posted earlier, but couldn't get rid of vignetting. But now I tried the Nikon's software. Please let me know your thoughts on that. Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6160.jpg Views:	0 Size:	982.7 KB ID:	1105740Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6111.jpg Views:	0 Size:	789.0 KB ID:	1105741Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6058.jpg Views:	0 Size:	806.1 KB ID:	1105742Click image for larger version  Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6164.jpg Views:	0 Size:	989.6 KB ID:	1105743

                Comment


                • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
                  Thank you for the review! Please see adjusted images for all but the 1st one. Also, the Ana one I had posted earlier, but couldn't get rid of vignetting. But now I tried the Nikon's software. Please let me know your thoughts on that.
                  1. very bad overprocessing
                  2. centering
                  3. contrast, obstruction
                  4. horizon, vignetting
                  5. borderline centering.

                  Comment


                  • Thanks again. I have removed certain images and have made adjustments to certain others. Please advise. Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6097.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	794.8 KB
ID:	1105794Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6058.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	807.6 KB
ID:	1105795Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6160.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	985.0 KB
ID:	1105796

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
                      Thanks again. I have removed certain images and have made adjustments to certain others. Please advise. Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6097.jpg
Views:	66
Size:	794.8 KB
ID:	1105794Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6058.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	807.6 KB
ID:	1105795Click image for larger version

Name:	20201220-1-20201220NZ6_6160.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	985.0 KB
ID:	1105796
                      1. ok for me
                      2-3. horizon (need a little CW)

                      Comment


                      • Thank you.. One quick question (not sure if this is the right forum). Do Korean Air and Korean Air Cargo count as 2 separate airlines for say "photographed 25 airlines badge"?

                        Comment


                        • Click image for larger version

Name:	20210104-1-NZ6_6389.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	666.2 KB
ID:	1106423Click image for larger version

Name:	20210104-1-NZ6_6384.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	735.0 KB
ID:	1106424 Happy New Year. Thoughts about these? I used DX crop and F13, so I am hoping vignetting is taken care of. Maybe soft / grainy?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	20210104-1-NZ6_6389.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	666.2 KB
ID:	1106423Click image for larger version

Name:	20210104-1-NZ6_6384.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	735.0 KB
ID:	1106424 Happy New Year. Thoughts about these? I used DX crop and F13, so I am hoping vignetting is taken care of. Maybe soft / grainy?
                            These would be rejected for similar.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              These would be rejected for similar.
                              Just to make sure - they will be rejected for soft/grainy, right? Or you meant vignetting? Thanks!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by arora7dm View Post

                                Just to make sure - they will be rejected for soft/grainy, right? Or you meant vignetting? Thanks!
                                They would be rejected for similar, as they are from the same sequence. No other rejection reasons will be given.

                                https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...milar-in-queue

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X