(arora7dm) - prescreening request / editing advice

[arora7dm]

Thank you. Will the last one be tagged "special livery"?

[dlowwa]

Thank you. Will the last one be tagged "special livery"?

Yes.

[arora7dm]

Hello everyone. I posted this here before, but this got rejected due to Vignetting. Can you please let me know your thoughts on appeal? I have it set to correct vignetting in LR. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8641568

If you think there needs to be adjustment needed still, I adjusted this one below "manually" even more...

[dlowwa]

Hello everyone. I posted this here before, but this got rejected due to Vignetting. Can you please let me know your thoughts on appeal? I have it set to correct vignetting in LR. Thank you.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8641568

If you think there needs to be adjustment needed still, I adjusted this one below "manually" even more...

Looks fine to me, maybe even a touch over-adjusted.

[arora7dm]

OK, thanks. I will submit now and see what they say. I do agree, it was fine before this "over-adjustment"

[arora7dm]

Also, does appealing ever help?

[dlowwa]

Also, does appealing ever help?

In my experience, I find that I accept 10-20% of appeals. I'm not sure overall what the success rate of appeals is, but I'd guess something similar. You'd definitely do better to check here first before appealing.

[arora7dm]

OK, thank you. I was just trying to decide between two pictures.

If I should appeal this one at the top, which was rejected for vignetting. Or upload a new one with slight over-correction, at the bottom.

[dlowwa]

OK, thank you. I was just trying to decide between two pictures.

If I should appeal this one at the top, which was rejected for vignetting. Or upload a new one with slight over-correction, at the bottom.

That'll be up to you, but you saw what I wrote about how often appeals are successful..

[arora7dm]

Hello everyone. I have some basic question on night photography. Due to lower light, and a need for higher ISO, there will be noise as well as softness. Is that taken into consideration? For example will any of these images work? If not, then I guess the only way to do it will be to use a tripod with a reasonably low ISO and take still pictures? Thank you.

[dlowwa]

Hello everyone. I have some basic question on night photography. Due to lower light, and a need for higher ISO, there will be noise as well as softness. Is that taken into consideration? For example will any of these images work? If not, then I guess the only way to do it will be to use a tripod with a reasonably low ISO and take still pictures?

Slight leeway might be given for noise, but not sharpness. None of your images would be acceptable due to obstruction, noise, blurriness, etc.

[arora7dm]

Hello everyone, your feedback on these would be very appreciated. First and last look like they have vignetting, though I tried to enable lens corrections in LR. Also, only 5 images at one time, right?

[dlowwa]

Hello everyone, your feedback on these would be very appreciated. First and last look like they have vignetting, though I tried to enable lens corrections in LR.

1. vignetting
2. horizon
3. vignetting, dirty, borderline soft
4. borderline soft
5. vignetting

Also, only 5 images at one time, right?

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/digital-photo-processing-forum/63048-suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

[arora7dm]

Thank you for the feedback. Made some adjustments:
1. Fixed vignetting more
2. Adjusted Horizon slightly (CCW)
3. Adjusted vignetting and tried to add some sharpening
4. Changed image
5. Fixed vignetting more

[dlowwa]

Thank you for the feedback. Made some adjustments:
1. Fixed vignetting more
2. Adjusted Horizon slightly (CCW)
3. Adjusted vignetting and tried to add some sharpening
4. Changed image
5. Fixed vignetting more

1-2. ok for me
3. vignetting/overprocessed
4. borderline soft
5. vignetting/overprocessed