tomobile - editing advice

[ratchada]

Sharpening looks ok to me; this is not 'Night Shot'.

Thank you for your reply.

I understood [ 2 ].
But regarding [ 1 ], in a series of uploading of that time, there's no 'Night Shot' photo so I didn't have to mark or click such a category at all.
Something went wrong, and I try to convince myself.

[dlowwa]

Hi, Crew

1. Could you tell me if I made anything wrong regarding "Categories wrong or missing" for this photo?
2. For later study and editing, more sharpness needed for this photo?

[ https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8917796 ]

Thank you in advance,

Sharpening looks ok to me; this is not 'Night Shot'.

[ratchada]

Hi, Crew

1. Could you tell me if I made anything wrong regarding "Categories wrong or missing" for this photo?
2. For later study and editing, more sharpness needed for this photo?

[ https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8917796 ]

Thank you in advance,

[ratchada]

Thank you very much.

[dlowwa]

Thank you for screening at all times.

I got this photo rejected for [ Horizon unlevel ] .

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8273247

My check points are as follows;



Could you please teach me where the standard points (or lines) are?

Thank you very much in advance,

In this case, when the actual horizon is not visible, it's better to use vertical references to judge horizon. If you look at the buildings in the background, they are all leaning left. This indicates that you should rotate the image CW (clockwise), in this case something like 0.5-0.6 degrees:

[ratchada]

Thank you for screening at all times.

I got this photo rejected for [ Horizon unlevel ] .

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8273247

My check points are as follows;



Could you please teach me where the standard points (or lines) are?

Thank you very much in advance,

[ratchada]

Thank you at all times, dlowwa-san.

> The actual horizon is more reliable than any vertical references.

Yes, I think so.
So I appealed another rejected photo and offered to send original raw file that you can see actual horizon.
Because the shape of breakwater is not exactly as same as actual horizon, some go into the bay, another toward out.
Anyway, I'm so happy to hear and to confirm that actual horizon is more reliable.
Thank you very much again.

[dlowwa]

Dear Crew,
Thank you at all times.

Could you kindly explain what (where) your horizontal standard (line or point) is.

The actual horizon. It's not level:



The actual horizon is more reliable than any vertical references.

[ratchada]

[ Horizon unlevel ]

Dear Crew,
Thank you at all times.

Could you kindly explain what (where) your horizontal standard (line or point) is.

[https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7644573]

I adjusted horizontal level by the edge of runway and vertical level by the poles for this rejected photo (as you can see grid lines).
All of them are located behind fuselage,
and it's natural to check horizontal level from a viewpoint of perspective.







I don't understand why this photo was rejected by the reason of [Horizon unlevel].

And I'm also wondering if you check white line (not horizon) front side of fuselage.


Thank you in advance,

[ratchada]

Thank you for your demonstration, dlowwa-san.

I remember, some expert left a advice on this forum in past times
that you should adjust R/G/B values same, to avoid being rejected for [Bad Color].
So, I tried to to do that, by color balance, filters and so on.

But now I understand that I do not always have to do so.

Thank you very much again.

[dlowwa]

Hello, Crew

Thank you for your time to screen at all times.

Could you kindly teach me 'How Bad?' about this rejected photo?
('Cos there's no screener's comment every time.)

[ https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7644569 ]

Just in case, I've attached screen-shot when I opened this photo on Photoshop.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]29425[/ATTACH]

Thank you in advance,

Very severe purple cast on whole image. I've corrected the left side for you to compare:

[ratchada]

Need advice for Bad Color

Hello, Crew

Thank you for your time to screen at all times.

Could you kindly teach me 'How Bad?' about this rejected photo?
('Cos there's no screener's comment every time.)

[ https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7644569 ]

Just in case, I've attached screen-shot when I opened this photo on Photoshop.



Thank you in advance,

[ratchada]

Hello dlowwa san,

One source says that JA3106 had been owned by Shikoku Air Service before,
so I didn't check Warbird category.

Thank you very much.
And I would like to say sorry to screeners for screening this photo again and again.

[dlowwa]

Hello Crew,

Could you kindly teach me how to fix this rejected photo?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7575639

> If the location is not an airport, you may use the Other Location option

This photo was not taken at the airport. So I filled the name of the place with Other Location option.

I am wondering what [Categories wrong or missing] is and [Bad Info] is.

Thank you very much in advance,

The location is correct. Airline 'Unknown' is not. Use 'Private'. Categories should be Small Prop and Warbird/Preserved.

[ratchada]

Categories wrong or missing and Bad Info

Hello Crew,

Could you kindly teach me how to fix this rejected photo?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=7575639

> If the location is not an airport, you may use the Other Location option

This photo was not taken at the airport. So I filled the name of the place with Other Location option.

I am wondering what [Categories wrong or missing] is and [Bad Info] is.

Thank you very much in advance,