Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi JP team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 5 for contrast, exposure, sharpness & if there is any heat haze?
    Don't really see any heat haze, and other items would not be an issue for me.

    Comment


    • Hi team, this was rejected for part reason of digital manipulation, is that where the exhaust trail is? Because just for future reference I don't know how to fix that, its not something i did in post processing, I know it kinda looks like i've used the dust spot remover in it but that's not the case. I'm not appealing or anything, I just want to learn for next time!

      https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9303059

      I have added the original un-edited photo just to show the exhaust trail


      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0345.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	261.0 KB
ID:	1120162
      Last edited by clinton_vern; 2021-07-29, 09:13. Reason: Added photo

      Comment


      • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
        Hi team, this was rejected for part reason of digital manipulation, is that where the exhaust trail is? Because just for future reference I don't know how to fix that, its not something i did in post processing, I know it kinda looks like i've used the dust spot remover in it but that's not the case. I'm not appealing or anything, I just want to learn for next time!

        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9303059

        I have added the original un-edited photo just to show the exhaust trail


        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0345.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	261.0 KB
ID:	1120162
        Looks like poor dust spot removal (or something else) below the tail.

        Comment


        • Hi team, I have just fixed this after a Dark/Underexposed & Too much or too little contrast rejection,does this now look ok in regards to both rejections?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	A97-448.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	281.0 KB
ID:	1120423

          Comment


          • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
            Hi team, I have just fixed this after a Dark/Underexposed & Too much or too little contrast rejection,does this now look ok in regards to both rejections?

            Click image for larger version

Name:	A97-448.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	281.0 KB
ID:	1120423
            Borderline for contrast (weak), imho.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              Borderline for contrast (weak), imho.
              Thank you

              Comment


              • Can someone please advise me as too what needs to be center on this image as the fuselage is centered using the JP center tool.

                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9381238

                Comment


                • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                  Can someone please advise me as too what needs to be center on this image as the fuselage is centered using the JP center tool.

                  https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9381238
                  Looks a touch high in the frame.

                  Comment


                  • Hi team, I was just wondering i these would ever be considered, i shot them back in 2006 with a 5 megapixel Sony

                    VH-AWU (pic 1) isn't on the database under this rego or any of it's previous rego's that I have found (yes its backlit)

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03642.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	380.8 KB
ID:	1121881Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03587.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	656.6 KB
ID:	1121882Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03612.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	831.2 KB
ID:	1121883Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC04103.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	887.7 KB
ID:	1121884

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                      Hi team, I was just wondering i these would ever be considered, i shot them back in 2006 with a 5 megapixel Sony

                      VH-AWU (pic 1) isn't on the database under this rego or any of it's previous rego's that I have found (yes its backlit)
                      All have issues with contrast (especially the first), but the quality otherwise seems acceptable for 2005. Rarity would then be the determining factor.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        All have issues with contrast (especially the first), but the quality otherwise seems acceptable for 2005. Rarity would then be the determining factor.
                        Thanks, I have increased the contrast.

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03642.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	380.7 KB
ID:	1121901

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                          Thanks, I have increased the contrast.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC03642.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	380.7 KB
ID:	1121901
                          Not much to add really. Contrast is terrible. Can't say whether it being an old(er) image and new reg. would outweigh that.

                          Comment


                          • Hi team, this will be a new rego to database but I am having trouble with the exposure. The exposure peaks to the right due to the brightness on the rear but if I try to level the exposure the front looks too dark. Is it worth trying to upload or will it be rejected for backlit and or exposure?

                            Many thanks

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0036.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	638.7 KB
ID:	1122342

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                              Hi team, this will be a new rego to database but I am having trouble with the exposure. The exposure peaks to the right due to the brightness on the rear but if I try to level the exposure the front looks too dark. Is it worth trying to upload or will it be rejected for backlit and or exposure?
                              Not backlit, but does need some brightening overall. Also somewhat soft/blurry, so might not actually be worth the effort.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                Not backlit, but does need some brightening overall. Also somewhat soft/blurry, so might not actually be worth the effort.
                                Thank you, I will skip this one & hope I catch it again some other time

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X