Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen for this image, the night shot I posted before I don't think i'll use. Can I please get contrast, exposure & obstruction (cone in front of engine) checked & anything else required?
    Borderline soft, otherwise ok for me.

    Comment


    • Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened from exposure & contrast & anything else, also with the stairs being part of the aircraft (stored under the main door) would they be considered obstruction??

      Thanks

      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0034.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1135615

      Comment


      • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
        Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened from exposure & contrast & anything else, also with the stairs being part of the aircraft (stored under the main door) would they be considered obstruction??
        Integral stairs are not considered obstruction. Would be ok for me.

        Comment


        • I’m sorry but I am a bit annoyed at this. This exact image got rejected for “Bad Info” first time around. My mistake totally. I added the exact same image to queue again with the correct info & now a “Heat Distortion” rejection? Couldn’t that have been added on the first rejection? Now I’ve lost an extra queue spot & my percentage dropped even more when I wouldn’t have re-uploaded in the first place if the “Heat Distortion” rejection had been seen the first time around.

          https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10104558

          Comment


          • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
            I’m sorry but I am a bit annoyed at this. This exact image got rejected for “Bad Info” first time around. My mistake totally. I added the exact same image to queue again with the correct info & now a “Heat Distortion” rejection? Couldn’t that have been added on the first rejection? Now I’ve lost an extra queue spot & my percentage dropped even more when I wouldn’t have re-uploaded in the first place if the “Heat Distortion” rejection had been seen the first time around.

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10104558
            Personal discretion. For me, it's not bad enough to reject, especially since it's a new reg., but others of course disagreed. Unfortunately there will never be 100% consensus on all issues.

            Comment


            • Massive long shot here but would these be considered acceptable at all or just keep them for myself? DQ-LIF is a new rego to database

              Thanks

              Click image for larger version

Name:	DQ-LIF.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	1.14 MB
ID:	1135834Click image for larger version

Name:	DQ-FJX.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	1135833

              Comment


              • Hello,

                due to the overcast conditions, the contrast is very weak and not fixable unfortunately.

                Best Regards from Germany,
                Julian S.​

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Julian S. View Post
                  Hello,

                  due to the overcast conditions, the contrast is very weak and not fixable unfortunately.
                  Thank you

                  Comment


                  • Hi JP team, can I please get an idea on whether this shot is worthy to e added to queue? I have never attempted to upload a shot like this before, can you please pre-screen & advise if I should bother or not?

                    Thank you

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0186.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	443.3 KB
ID:	1136350

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                      Hi JP team, can I please get an idea on whether this shot is worthy to e added to queue? I have never attempted to upload a shot like this before, can you please pre-screen & advise if I should bother or not?
                      A bit dark overall, but might be acceptable.

                      Comment


                      • Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 2 images? First one (Fly Pelican) was rejected for dust & over exposure, does it look ok now, second one can you please check contrast, exposure & sharpness.

                        Thank you

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-NTL.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	466.9 KB
ID:	1136854Click image for larger version

Name:	DQ-FSJ.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	458.3 KB
ID:	1136855

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                          Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 2 images? First one (Fly Pelican) was rejected for dust & over exposure, does it look ok now, second one can you please check contrast, exposure & sharpness.
                          First would be ok for me; second is soft/blurry and the background looks blown out.

                          Comment


                          • Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened for post processing, exposure, sharpness & contrast. Was strangely hard to get a good shot. (This is "Hot" for new livery)

                            Thanks

                            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0001-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.17 MB ID:	1137561

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                              Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened for post processing, exposure, sharpness & contrast. Was strangely hard to get a good shot. (This is "Hot" for new livery)
                              Contrast a bit harsh, but otherwise ok for me.

                              Comment


                              • Hi team

                                Can I please get a pre-screen for the following 2 images?

                                The first one would it be considered too "alike" as my previous shot of the same rego at the same airport? link: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10376702

                                The second shot just a general pre-screen ut also would the pole be considered obstruction or nit as it doesn't obstruct the tower itself.

                                Thanks in advanced.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0001.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	946.2 KB
ID:	1138792Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0009.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	975.9 KB
ID:	1138793

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X