Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen for this image, the night shot I posted before I don't think i'll use. Can I please get contrast, exposure & obstruction (cone in front of engine) checked & anything else required?

Borderline soft, otherwise ok for me.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened from exposure & contrast & anything else, also with the stairs being part of the aircraft (stored under the main door) would they be considered obstruction??

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened from exposure & contrast & anything else, also with the stairs being part of the aircraft (stored under the main door) would they be considered obstruction??

Integral stairs are not considered obstruction. Would be ok for me.

[clinton_vern]

I’m sorry but I am a bit annoyed at this. This exact image got rejected for “Bad Info” first time around. My mistake totally. I added the exact same image to queue again with the correct info & now a “Heat Distortion” rejection? Couldn’t that have been added on the first rejection? Now I’ve lost an extra queue spot & my percentage dropped even more when I wouldn’t have re-uploaded in the first place if the “Heat Distortion” rejection had been seen the first time around.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10104558

[dlowwa]

I’m sorry but I am a bit annoyed at this. This exact image got rejected for “Bad Info” first time around. My mistake totally. I added the exact same image to queue again with the correct info & now a “Heat Distortion” rejection? Couldn’t that have been added on the first rejection? Now I’ve lost an extra queue spot & my percentage dropped even more when I wouldn’t have re-uploaded in the first place if the “Heat Distortion” rejection had been seen the first time around.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10104558

Personal discretion. For me, it's not bad enough to reject, especially since it's a new reg., but others of course disagreed. Unfortunately there will never be 100% consensus on all issues.

[clinton_vern]

Massive long shot here but would these be considered acceptable at all or just keep them for myself? DQ-LIF is a new rego to database

Thanks

[Julian S.]

Hello,

due to the overcast conditions, the contrast is very weak and not fixable unfortunately.

[clinton_vern]

Hello,

due to the overcast conditions, the contrast is very weak and not fixable unfortunately.

Thank you

[clinton_vern]

Hi JP team, can I please get an idea on whether this shot is worthy to e added to queue? I have never attempted to upload a shot like this before, can you please pre-screen & advise if I should bother or not?

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hi JP team, can I please get an idea on whether this shot is worthy to e added to queue? I have never attempted to upload a shot like this before, can you please pre-screen & advise if I should bother or not?

A bit dark overall, but might be acceptable.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 2 images? First one (Fly Pelican) was rejected for dust & over exposure, does it look ok now, second one can you please check contrast, exposure & sharpness.

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 2 images? First one (Fly Pelican) was rejected for dust & over exposure, does it look ok now, second one can you please check contrast, exposure & sharpness.

First would be ok for me; second is soft/blurry and the background looks blown out.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened for post processing, exposure, sharpness & contrast. Was strangely hard to get a good shot. (This is "Hot" for new livery)

Thanks

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened for post processing, exposure, sharpness & contrast. Was strangely hard to get a good shot. (This is "Hot" for new livery)

Contrast a bit harsh, but otherwise ok for me.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team

Can I please get a pre-screen for the following 2 images?

The first one would it be considered too "alike" as my previous shot of the same rego at the same airport? link: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10376702

The second shot just a general pre-screen ut also would the pole be considered obstruction or nit as it doesn't obstruct the tower itself.

Thanks in advanced.