Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on this image in regards to exposure, obstruction ( main landing gear & the shrub) & sharpness for 1920px
    A bit dark and soft, though the latter is ok for me. Obstruction likely an issue as looks entirely avoidable.

    Comment


    • Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image that was rejected for dark/underexposed & softness, this is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11048803

      This is the image with added sharpness & exposure/shadows

      Thank you

      Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A1751.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	703.5 KB
ID:	1162595

      Comment


      • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
        Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image that was rejected for dark/underexposed & softness, this is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11048803

        This is the image with added sharpness & exposure/shadows
        Exposure ok, but still pretty soft.

        Comment


        • Hi team, I shot this today with a Canon 5d MkIV & L series lens at a distance but with almost nil cropping required. In my eyes the image was very sharp but has since been rejected twice. It is also hot for new livery. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11092466

          Can I please get a pre-screen then for this same image with more added sharpness? I really would like to get it up at 1920px but if that's not the case, all good.

          Thank you

          Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4560.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	514.3 KB
ID:	1162804

          Comment


          • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
            Hi team, I shot this today with a Canon 5d MkIV & L series lens at a distance but with almost nil cropping required. In my eyes the image was very sharp but has since been rejected twice. It is also hot for new livery. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11092466

            Can I please get a pre-screen then for this same image with more added sharpness? I really would like to get it up at 1920px but if that's not the case, all good.
            This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.
              I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

              Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4562.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	514.7 KB
ID:	1162819

              Comment


              • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4562.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	514.7 KB
ID:	1162819
                Hi Clinton, the photo is still a bit soft (borderline in my opinion), but am not a screener.

                Kind Regards
                Cameron

                Comment


                • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                  I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.
                  Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.
                    Ok, thanks for your help

                    Comment


                    • Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

                      Thanks

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4543.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	522.5 KB
ID:	1162857

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                        Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

                        Thanks
                        Hi, Not a screener but this shot looks a bit too soft also.

                        Tyler

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                          Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?
                          Too soft.

                          Comment


                          • Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
                            Is this now sorted with attached image?

                            Thank you

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A3456.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1163020

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                              Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
                              Is this now sorted with attached image?

                              Thank you

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A3456.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1163020
                              Hi, based off the light pole and the windsock. It looks like the horizon is correct.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                                Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
                                Is this now sorted with attached image?
                                Would be fine for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X