Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen on this image in regards to exposure, obstruction ( main landing gear & the shrub) & sharpness for 1920px

A bit dark and soft, though the latter is ok for me. Obstruction likely an issue as looks entirely avoidable.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image that was rejected for dark/underexposed & softness, this is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11048803

This is the image with added sharpness & exposure/shadows

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image that was rejected for dark/underexposed & softness, this is the rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11048803

This is the image with added sharpness & exposure/shadows

Exposure ok, but still pretty soft.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, I shot this today with a Canon 5d MkIV & L series lens at a distance but with almost nil cropping required. In my eyes the image was very sharp but has since been rejected twice. It is also hot for new livery. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11092466

Can I please get a pre-screen then for this same image with more added sharpness? I really would like to get it up at 1920px but if that's not the case, all good.

Thank you

[dlowwa]

Hi team, I shot this today with a Canon 5d MkIV & L series lens at a distance but with almost nil cropping required. In my eyes the image was very sharp but has since been rejected twice. It is also hot for new livery. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11092466

Can I please get a pre-screen then for this same image with more added sharpness? I really would like to get it up at 1920px but if that's not the case, all good.

This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.

[clinton_vern]

This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.

I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

[Cameron Roberts]

I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

Hi Clinton, the photo is still a bit soft (borderline in my opinion), but am not a screener.

Kind Regards
Cameron

[dlowwa]

I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.

[clinton_vern]

Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.

Ok, thanks for your help

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

Thanks

[Tyler Godfrey]

Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

Thanks

Hi, Not a screener but this shot looks a bit too soft also.

Tyler

[dlowwa]

Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

Too soft.

[clinton_vern]

Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
Is this now sorted with attached image?

Thank you

[Cameron Roberts]

Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
Is this now sorted with attached image?

Thank you

Hi, based off the light pole and the windsock. It looks like the horizon is correct.

[dlowwa]

Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
Is this now sorted with attached image?

Would be fine for me.