Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can i please get someone to have a quick look over these, my biggest concern is them being to soft and or contrast.

    Thanks in advanced

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0126.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	494.0 KB
ID:	1097604Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0001.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	704.9 KB
ID:	1097605Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	441.6 KB
ID:	1097606
    Softness, contrast, and noise are issues on the first. Second is ok for me, and third has just a bit of noise but would also be ok for me.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      Softness, contrast, and noise are issues on the first. Second is ok for me, and third has just a bit of noise but would also be ok for me.
      Thanks!

      Comment


      • #48
        Ok, these pics have been bothering me, i feel they are too dark (under exposed) or too soft to be accepted, can i get a pre screen please?

        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0163.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	554.7 KB
ID:	1097675Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0131.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	543.1 KB
ID:	1097676Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0139.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	564.5 KB
ID:	1097677Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0287.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	487.6 KB
ID:	1097678Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0260.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	563.6 KB
ID:	1097679

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
          Ok, these pics have been bothering me, i feel they are too dark (under exposed) or too soft to be accepted, can i get a pre screen please?

          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0163.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	554.7 KB
ID:	1097675Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0131.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	543.1 KB
ID:	1097676Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0139.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	564.5 KB
ID:	1097677Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0287.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	487.6 KB
ID:	1097678Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0260.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	563.6 KB
ID:	1097679
          Yes, contrast is poor on all of these.

          Comment


          • #50
            Can I please get some clarification in regards to helicopters &’their rotors being cut off? I have quite a few helicopter photos accepted with the full body of the helicopter in shot, with part of the main rotor blade being cropped out. No issues. In regards to this rejection, I understand there are 2 reasons but this is the 3rd time I have had a helicopter photo partially rejected for “part of aircraft cut off”

            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8382334

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
              Can I please get some clarification in regards to helicopters &’their rotors being cut off? I have quite a few helicopter photos accepted with the full body of the helicopter in shot, with part of the main rotor blade being cropped out. No issues. In regards to this rejection, I understand there are 2 reasons but this is the 3rd time I have had a helicopter photo partially rejected for “part of aircraft cut off”

              https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=8382334
              Just awkward the way you've cropped it here. Slightly wider crop would have allowed you to keep the whole rotor in.

              Comment


              • #52
                Hi team, i have 3 pics I would like pre screened if possible, the first one was shot in a very heavy downpour so not too sure if that'll effect things, I think it will. The second & third one I would like to know if they are sharp enough ect

                Thanks


                Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-VRQ.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	386.2 KB
ID:	1098115
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0004.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	416.8 KB
ID:	1098116Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	397.7 KB
ID:	1098114

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
                  Hi team, i have 3 pics I would like pre screened if possible, the first one was shot in a very heavy downpour so not too sure if that'll effect things, I think it will. The second & third one I would like to know if they are sharp enough ect

                  Thanks


                  Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-VRQ.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	386.2 KB
ID:	1098115
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0004.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	416.8 KB
ID:	1098116Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	397.7 KB
ID:	1098114
                  1) Contrast
                  2) soft, dark
                  3) OK, maybe slightly overexposed
                  My photos on Flickr www.flickr.com/photos/geridominguez

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

                    1) Contrast
                    2) soft, dark
                    3) OK, maybe slightly overexposed
                    Thank you!

                    Can I please get one more screened for the time being, my concern is lighting.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	364.4 KB
ID:	1098146

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                      Thank you!

                      Can I please get one more screened for the time being, my concern is lighting.

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	364.4 KB
ID:	1098146
                      Would be rejected for dark/contrast.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Would be rejected for dark/contrast.
                        Thanks, is this any better?

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	358.3 KB
ID:	1098224

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                          Thanks, is this any better?

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	358.3 KB
ID:	1098224
                          A bit brighter, contrast still poor.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                            A bit brighter, contrast still poor.
                            Thank you, hopefully i am going in the right direction?

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	350.5 KB
ID:	1098271


                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

                              Thank you, hopefully i am going in the right direction?

                              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0111.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	350.5 KB
ID:	1098271

                              I don't think your processing is really the problem so much as the somewhat overcast skies at the time, which is causing the diffuse light on the aircraft. Not sure how fixable it is with more editing.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                                I don't think your processing is really the problem so much as the somewhat overcast skies at the time, which is causing the diffuse light on the aircraft. Not sure how fixable it is with more editing.
                                No worries, thank you!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X