Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline for contrast (weak), imho.
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, I have just fixed this after a Dark/Underexposed & Too much or too little contrast rejection,does this now look ok in regards to both rejections?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A97-448.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	281.0 KB
ID:	1120423
    Borderline for contrast (weak), imho.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, I have just fixed this after a Dark/Underexposed & Too much or too little contrast rejection,does this now look ok in regards to both rejections?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A97-448.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	281.0 KB
ID:	1120423

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, this was rejected for part reason of digital manipulation, is that where the exhaust trail is? Because just for future reference I don't know how to fix that, its not something i did in post processing, I know it kinda looks like i've used the dust spot remover in it but that's not the case. I'm not appealing or anything, I just want to learn for next time!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9303059

    I have added the original un-edited photo just to show the exhaust trail


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0345.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	261.0 KB
ID:	1120162
    Looks like poor dust spot removal (or something else) below the tail.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, this was rejected for part reason of digital manipulation, is that where the exhaust trail is? Because just for future reference I don't know how to fix that, its not something i did in post processing, I know it kinda looks like i've used the dust spot remover in it but that's not the case. I'm not appealing or anything, I just want to learn for next time!

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9303059

    I have added the original un-edited photo just to show the exhaust trail


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0345.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	261.0 KB
ID:	1120162
    Last edited by clinton_vern; 2021-07-29, 09:13. Reason: Added photo

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi JP team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 5 for contrast, exposure, sharpness & if there is any heat haze?
    Don't really see any heat haze, and other items would not be an issue for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi JP team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following 5 for contrast, exposure, sharpness & if there is any heat haze?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A54-048.jpg
Views:	28
Size:	559.9 KB
ID:	1119940Click image for larger version

Name:	A27-17.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	638.3 KB
ID:	1119941Click image for larger version

Name:	A27-33.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	680.3 KB
ID:	1119942Click image for larger version

Name:	A27-08.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	657.9 KB
ID:	1119943Click image for larger version

Name:	A27-34.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	650.6 KB
ID:	1119944

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. borderline dark/contrast
    2. borderline soft
    3. ok for me
    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi JP team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following images in regards to contrast, exposure & sharpness?
    1. borderline dark/contrast
    2. borderline soft
    3. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi JP team, can I please get a pre-screen on the following images in regards to contrast, exposure & sharpness?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	63-8021.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	258.8 KB
ID:	1119588Click image for larger version

Name:	RP-C3501.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	328.8 KB
ID:	1119589Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-TOA.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	624.1 KB
ID:	1119590

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Are these any better in regards to noise, softness & over processing? Once again they are 2 different rego's

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A39-002.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	275.8 KB
ID:	1119334Click image for larger version

Name:	A39-004.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	291.4 KB
ID:	1119335
    Maybe a bit dark, but would be ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Are these any better in regards to noise, softness & over processing? Once again they are 2 different rego's

    Click image for larger version

Name:	A39-002.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	275.8 KB
ID:	1119334Click image for larger version

Name:	A39-004.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	291.4 KB
ID:	1119335

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Images are soft, noisy, overprocessed, and unless there are three different KC-30s, at least two of them would be similar.
    Understood. Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

    Thanks, i'll fix them. Can you please check the same for the following 3 taken on the same day? Also with the formation one, do I upload the rego of the largest aircraft? I've never uploaded a shot with multiple air frames. Also the 2 KC-30's are different regos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0403.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	356.5 KB
ID:	1119080Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0401.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	364.9 KB
ID:	1119078Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0409.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	364.4 KB
ID:	1119079
    Images are soft, noisy, overprocessed, and unless there are three different KC-30s, at least two of them would be similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Borderline overprocessed/soft for both.
    Thanks, i'll fix them. Can you please check the same for the following 3 taken on the same day? Also with the formation one, do I upload the rego of the largest aircraft? I've never uploaded a shot with multiple air frames. Also the 2 KC-30's are different regos.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0403.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	356.5 KB
ID:	1119080Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0401.jpg
Views:	61
Size:	364.9 KB
ID:	1119078Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0409.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	364.4 KB
ID:	1119079

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X