Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

    Increased contrast, any better or not fixable?
    Slightly better I suppose, but overall the light is still quite flat.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Likely a contrast rejection.
    Increased contrast, any better or not fixable?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	10-0053.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	716.6 KB
ID:	1156707

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image in regards to contrast, exposure ect. I have all 8 airframes in roughly the same position & the same conditions but i'll just post the one for pre-screening.
    Likely a contrast rejection.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image in regards to contrast, exposure ect. I have all 8 airframes in roughly the same position & the same conditions but i'll just post the one for pre-screening.

    Thanks


    Click image for larger version

Name:	10-0053.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	695.0 KB
ID:	1156618

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please find out what the Bad Info rejection was for? I am not getting emails so have no explanation.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10893291
    Comments on rejection: Airline's name is written on the tail
    Comments on appeal: SureFlight on the tail

    Please post here before appealing in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, can I please find out what the Bad Info rejection was for? I am not getting emails so have no explanation.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10893291

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team , can I please get a pre-screen of this image? More or less contrast. I have had multiple rejections for both ways & its a new rego.
    Contrast is pretty washed out. Also a bit soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team , can I please get a pre-screen of this image? More or less contrast. I have had multiple rejections for both ways & its a new rego.


    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0740.jpg
Views:	54
Size:	757.1 KB
ID:	1154066

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image? Looking at grass obstruction, contrast & horizon (took the horizon off what I think is the closest hangar vertical I could find.
    Might be acceptable since it doesn't look like it was avoidable.

    Leave a comment:


  • SLplanespotter
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image? Looking at grass obstruction, contrast & horizon (took the horizon off what I think is the closest hangar vertical I could find.

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0146.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1153842
    I can't answer for the grass, however one thing I do notice is that the whites on the tail are overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of this image? Looking at grass obstruction, contrast & horizon (took the horizon off what I think is the closest hangar vertical I could find.

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0146.jpg
Views:	60
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1153842

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

    So same with these then?
    Slightly better. I wouldn't say they would be automatic rejections (latter three I'd consider borderline), but if you decide to try, don't be surprised if that's how it ends up.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Soft and poor contrast. Not sure it's fixable.
    So same with these then?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-VUR.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	798.5 KB
ID:	1153425Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-VFD.jpg
Views:	65
Size:	761.3 KB
ID:	1153426Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-XZC.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	791.2 KB
ID:	1153427Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-VGZ.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	822.6 KB
ID:	1153428

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened? Would this crop be acceptable & are there any contrast issues (weak or strong?)
    Soft and poor contrast. Not sure it's fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, can I please get this pre-screened? Would this crop be acceptable & are there any contrast issues (weak or strong?)

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CC-BGP.jpg
Views:	68
Size:	678.6 KB
ID:	1153413

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X