Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton_vern - Pre Screen / Editing Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, the following 5 images were rejected for the reason listed below, are they better now?

    Thank you

    1: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    2: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    3: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    4: - Undersharpened (Soft) (IMAGE SHARPENED)

    5: - Overexposed
    - Undersharpened (Soft) (IMAGE SHARPENED, EXPOSURE REDUCED)
    These are all much to soft for 1920pix. Maybe you should try 1280 for better results.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, the following 5 images were rejected for the reason listed below, are they better now?

    Thank you

    1: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    2: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    3: - Undersharpened (Soft)
    - Too much or too little contrast (IMAGE SHARPENED, CONTRAST ADDED)

    4: - Undersharpened (Soft) (IMAGE SHARPENED)

    5: - Overexposed
    - Undersharpened (Soft) (IMAGE SHARPENED, EXPOSURE REDUCED)

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-ZBKC.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1164150Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-BLW.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	1.59 MB
ID:	1164145Click image for larger version

Name:	VH-EBL.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	1164148Click image for larger version

Name:	B-1168.jpg
Views:	58
Size:	1.62 MB
ID:	1164146Click image for larger version

Name:	P2-PXC.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	1.75 MB
ID:	1164149
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of the following image in regards to sharpness at 1920px & anything else noticeable?
    Borderline soft, but ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, can I please get a pre-screen of the following image in regards to sharpness at 1920px & anything else noticeable?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A5207.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	1.87 MB
ID:	1163769

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
    Is this now sorted with attached image?
    Would be fine for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cameron Roberts
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
    Is this now sorted with attached image?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A3456.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1163020
    Hi, based off the light pole and the windsock. It looks like the horizon is correct.

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, this got rejected for horizon unlevel (notes of needs CW rotation) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11060420
    Is this now sorted with attached image?

    Thank you

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A3456.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	1.36 MB
ID:	1163020

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?
    Too soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyler Godfrey
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

    Thanks
    Hi, Not a screener but this shot looks a bit too soft also.

    Tyler

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Hi team, is this shot any better or is it still too soft?

    Thanks

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4543.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	522.5 KB
ID:	1162857

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.
    Ok, thanks for your help

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

    I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.
    Also very soft. No chance it would be accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cameron Roberts
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post

    I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4562.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	514.7 KB
ID:	1162819
    Hi Clinton, the photo is still a bit soft (borderline in my opinion), but am not a screener.

    Kind Regards
    Cameron

    Leave a comment:


  • clinton_vern
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.
    I just realised I was uploading the wrong image. This is the correct image, personally I think its much sharper but i'll leave that to your judgement.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	0Y1A4562.jpg
Views:	87
Size:	514.7 KB
ID:	1162819

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by clinton_vern View Post
    Hi team, I shot this today with a Canon 5d MkIV & L series lens at a distance but with almost nil cropping required. In my eyes the image was very sharp but has since been rejected twice. It is also hot for new livery. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11092466

    Can I please get a pre-screen then for this same image with more added sharpness? I really would like to get it up at 1920px but if that's not the case, all good.
    This image is very soft. Either a poor edit, or it might be out of focus.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X