Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

zephyrmk4 - editing/screening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Sorry, I must've misunderstood. I was hoping to reupload the photo, but I don't want to make any changes to the image itself and was after a more detailed reason behind the rejection for more understanding to it. I understand now that it's against the forum rules to ask for feedback after an appeal. My bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Image has already been appealed. In the future please post questions about rejections before appealing, as you have already been asked to read here:

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

    Re-uploading the image with no changes will likely result in a warning being placed on your account.

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Thanks for the feedback.

    Wasn't 100% sure where to put something like this but I have a query regarding an appeal result.

    This was recently rejected for a similar photo - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8781199

    I, however, beg to differ; The only attributes that same I see in this is the aircraft and possibly lighting. However, everything else is significantly different in my opinion; the background, angle, state, lighting (to an extent).

    After the appeal, I was led to the upload guidelines. which I then linked that the only reason for the appeal would be the point of:

    'Similar refers to:
    - a photo taken from the same sequence the same day e. landing, taxiing, ramp parking or take off'. Regarding that, the photo already in the database was taxiing and the photo rejected was being pushbacked, and considering ramp parking and taxiing are different I'd assume pushback and taxi are different. Im only bringing this to the forum because I feel it's more responsible rather than reuploading with a note to the screeners incase I'm missing something regarding the rejection. Sorry for the hastle just really wanting a more in-depth reason for the rejection.

    Cheers.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4 View Post
    Thanks for the reply, one other thing, the photo at the bottom was owned by Mount Cook Airline and operated by Air New Zealand, but since then Air New Zealand now has full ownership of the link fleet. So there writing 'Operated by Mount Cook Air' was removed from below the Star Alliance logo. Would either of those points be enough to differ the two uploads?
    If the change to the livery were more significant, it could make it not similar, but in this case the change is so small as to not be noticeable (you needed to point it out to me) so doesn't really factor in.

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Thanks for the reply, one other thing, the photo at the bottom was owned by Mount Cook Airline and operated by Air New Zealand, but since then Air New Zealand now has full ownership of the link fleet. So there writing 'Operated by Mount Cook Air' was removed from below the Star Alliance logo. Would either of those points be enough to differ the two uploads?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4 View Post
    Afternoon everyone, quick question; would the following image be rejected for being similar to the one below it? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8847.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1106827Click image for larger version

Name:	24924_1577927239.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	507.2 KB
ID:	1106828
    Thought I'd check considering the two different backgrounds.
    Yes, very likely to be considered similar.

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Afternoon everyone, quick question; would the following image be rejected for being similar to the one below it? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8847.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	1.18 MB
ID:	1106827Click image for larger version

Name:	24924_1577927239.jpg
Views:	24
Size:	507.2 KB
ID:	1106828
    Thought I'd check considering the two different backgrounds.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4
    Thanks for the reply, would the dirt on the window lead to a rejection in this case?
    It would for me, but couldn't be certain about other screeners.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4 View Post
    Appreciate the feedback on the last one.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9403.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	841.0 KB
ID:	1101408
    In the past, I've had some troubles with uploading wing view shots. However, looking back at them now I can see the problems quite clearly, I'm feeling more confident about this one however I'm unsure on a few spots. Would the window frame on the right be acceptable? Along with that, any other points would be much appreciated!

    Cheers
    Window frame is ok; horizon is a bit off. This kind of framing is subjective, but I don't see anything that immediately disqualifies it. The only issue for me is the dirt/reflection on the window.

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Appreciate the feedback on the last one.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9403.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	841.0 KB
ID:	1101408
    In the past, I've had some troubles with uploading wing view shots. However, looking back at them now I can see the problems quite clearly, I'm feeling more confident about this one however I'm unsure on a few spots. Would the window frame on the right be acceptable? Along with that, any other points would be much appreciated!

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4 View Post
    Evening everyone,

    would someone mind giving me some feedback on this photo what ever it may be. Im yet to upload a photo to screening that is of this angle.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7742.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	589.7 KB
ID:	1099927
    Some light editing halos are visible, but other than that, it should be acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Evening everyone,

    would someone mind giving me some feedback on this photo what ever it may be. Im yet to upload a photo to screening that is of this angle.Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7742.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	589.7 KB
ID:	1099927

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by zephyrmk4 View Post
    In the photo attached, would it get rejected for obstruction due to the reflective poles?
    Yes.

    Also, when you get a chance, please read here (in particular, #4)

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ning-from-crew

    Leave a comment:


  • FlyBoyOne
    replied
    Kia Ora, The 2 small yellow poles are just in the way!

    n.b they will have to limit you uploads at some point mate!

    Leave a comment:


  • zephyrmk4
    replied
    Obstruction Rejection?

    In the photo attached, would it get rejected for obstruction due to the reflective poles?

    Cheers
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X