Pre-Screening Request

[Luca_G22]

Hi everyone
This photo has been rejected
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8198806
Initially i thought for something related to the lack of infos, but then i read the reason. Photo was took with the subject with the sun in front. Initially i took the first photos on the other side of the helicopter, but the friend that was with me, another jp uploader, suggested me to take the pictures on this side, because it was more entlightened. In fact sun was a little bit on the right side of the helicopter. I consider this image not backlit (i repeat, sun was in front but also more on the right side than to the left one), and a good image too, with the moon on the background.

[dlowwa]

Hi everybody. I had two rejections recently that i have some problem to understand (i hope i am writing this post in the right place).
First one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8174488 (histogram seems to be alright, i didn't want to increase exposition not to "burn" the white parts), dark zones seem to be not excessively high.

Yes, just a bit dark, especially in the shadows. Should be easy to fix.

Second one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8175301 what is the similar photo? I don't have anyone of the same registration already in the database. Yes, there was another photo of the same plane in the queue, but it was a takeoff, so no similarities (in fact in the previous queue i had two pictures of the same airplane, one in takeoff and one in landing, and both of them have been accepted without any trouble).

They were in fact deemed too similar despite being take off and landing as the angle and composition were nearly identical.

[Luca_G22]

Hi everybody. I had two rejections recently that i have some problem to understand (i hope i am writing this post in the right place).
First one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8174488 (histogram seems to be alright, i didn't want to increase exposition not to "burn" the white parts), dark zones seem to be not excessively high.
Second one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8175301 what is the similar photo? I don't have anyone of the same registration already in the database. Yes, there was another photo of the same plane in the queue, but it was a takeoff, so no similarities (in fact in the previous queue i had two pictures of the same airplane, one in takeoff and one in landing, and both of them have been accepted without any trouble).
Regards
L

[dlowwa]

Hi people. I took this helicopter (yes, the image is still a work in progress, i still have to edit it properly) but i know NOTHING about it: It is an AW139 but apart from that i don't know things like registration or serial number. Under this situation, can i still upload this image and, if yes, how?
Regards
Luca

This is the photo editing forum, where you ask for advice on editing your images. You might want to try a different forum if you're looking for help on info.

[Luca_G22]

Hi people. I took this helicopter (yes, the image is still a work in progress, i still have to edit it properly) but i know NOTHING about it: It is an AW139 but apart from that i don't know things like registration or serial number. Under this situation, can i still upload this image and, if yes, how?
Regards
Luca

[dlowwa]

Hi Everybody. I have some photos i feel a little bit unsure about them, so i prefer asking before submitting. What do you think about them?
Thank you in advance for any answer
Have a good afternoon
L

#2 a bit soft, and borderline heat haze on #4; otherwise they would be ok for me.

[Luca_G22]

Hi Everybody. I have some photos i feel a little bit unsure about them, so i prefer asking before submitting. What do you think about them?
Thank you in advance for any answer
Have a good afternoon
L

[dlowwa]

Hi everybody. I write this because i have some problems in detecting softness. So, can you please give me a judgement about the attached images?
Thank you
L

#4 is a little worse than the others, but for the rest there is only minor softness visible, and should be easy to fix.

[Luca_G22]

Hi everybody. I write this because i have some problems in detecting softness. So, can you please give me a judgement about the attached images?
Thank you
L

[LX-A343]

Hi everybody, i would like to upload the attached images, but i have some doubt because the photos have been taken without the best light. Let me know your judgements.
Have a nice evening

1) has the best chances of acceptance
2) contrast, soft
3) maybe a tad soft
4) soft, heat distortion
5) slightly soft

[Luca_G22]

Hi everybody, i would like to upload the attached images, but i have some doubt because the photos have been taken without the best light. Let me know your judgements.
Have a nice evening

[Luca_G22]

Alright, now it's all clear about point n.4.
I've already appealed just because i was taking for granted that my picture would' ve been accepted, seen my precedents. I just don't understand why this time a rejection has occurred. I simply ask justice for my picture.

[dlowwa]

Hi, when you get the chance, please read here thoroughly, especially #4, and the part about asking for advice before appealing:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew

I've moved your post to your previous thread, but as you've already appealed the image in question, I'll refrain from commenting on it.

[Luca_G22]

Hi everybody, i have a problem: the following photo has been rejected:
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8002128 (takeoff)
because similar to this one
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9252393 (landing)
I disagree with this rejection because i have many accepted photos of the a plane from the same side, both in takeoff and landing, without any worry for similarities. Exemples as allegations:
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9662520
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9639925
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9184784
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9524409
Therefore i ask my "guilty" picture of Iran Air in takeoff to be accepted as well.
Cheers

[dlowwa]

[ATTACH=CONFIG]28783[/ATTACH]
Uploaded again (Insert image --> from computer) I hope it works now, maybe yesterday there were problems with the forum

Horizon is off (needs CW rotation) and seems to be a bit heat hazed.