If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi people. I took this helicopter (yes, the image is still a work in progress, i still have to edit it properly) but i know NOTHING about it: It is an AW139 but apart from that i don't know things like registration or serial number. Under this situation, can i still upload this image and, if yes, how?
Regards
Luca
Hi people. I took this helicopter (yes, the image is still a work in progress, i still have to edit it properly) but i know NOTHING about it: It is an AW139 but apart from that i don't know things like registration or serial number. Under this situation, can i still upload this image and, if yes, how?
Regards
Luca
This is the photo editing forum, where you ask for advice on editing your images. You might want to try a different forum if you're looking for help on info.
Hi everybody. I had two rejections recently that i have some problem to understand (i hope i am writing this post in the right place).
First one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8174488 (histogram seems to be alright, i didn't want to increase exposition not to "burn" the white parts), dark zones seem to be not excessively high.
Second one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8175301 what is the similar photo? I don't have anyone of the same registration already in the database. Yes, there was another photo of the same plane in the queue, but it was a takeoff, so no similarities (in fact in the previous queue i had two pictures of the same airplane, one in takeoff and one in landing, and both of them have been accepted without any trouble).
Regards
L
Hi everybody. I had two rejections recently that i have some problem to understand (i hope i am writing this post in the right place).
First one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8174488 (histogram seems to be alright, i didn't want to increase exposition not to "burn" the white parts), dark zones seem to be not excessively high.
Yes, just a bit dark, especially in the shadows. Should be easy to fix.
Second one: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8175301 what is the similar photo? I don't have anyone of the same registration already in the database. Yes, there was another photo of the same plane in the queue, but it was a takeoff, so no similarities (in fact in the previous queue i had two pictures of the same airplane, one in takeoff and one in landing, and both of them have been accepted without any trouble).
They were in fact deemed too similar despite being take off and landing as the angle and composition were nearly identical.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Initially i thought for something related to the lack of infos, but then i read the reason. Photo was took with the subject with the sun in front. Initially i took the first photos on the other side of the helicopter, but the friend that was with me, another jp uploader, suggested me to take the pictures on this side, because it was more entlightened. In fact sun was a little bit on the right side of the helicopter. I consider this image not backlit (i repeat, sun was in front but also more on the right side than to the left one), and a good image too, with the moon on the background.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Initially i thought for something related to the lack of infos, but then i read the reason. Photo was took with the subject with the sun in front. Initially i took the first photos on the other side of the helicopter, but the friend that was with me, another jp uploader, suggested me to take the pictures on this side, because it was more entlightened. In fact sun was a little bit on the right side of the helicopter. I consider this image not backlit (i repeat, sun was in front but also more on the right side than to the left one), and a good image too, with the moon on the background.
I agree with the screeners here. Most of what we see, is in its own shadow.
Hi everyone. I am not fully confident about these pictures, the 777 in particular: it was taken early in the morning with the sky a bit misty, and i am wandering if an uploading is worthy, or it could occur in a rejection for contrast. The pictures of 787 and Beluga have been taken both with the sun quite aligned, but i think that both of them will not be considered backlit. Finally the little kids: for the picture of the embraer, i left some contrast to distinguish it from the clouds, but i have the fear to have left it still too dark; last but not least, the atr: is it soft? You know, my soft-skills about pictures are not very refined and I often need your help in this situation. Thank you in advance for any reply, have a good evening.
Hi everyone. I am not fully confident about these pictures, the 777 in particular: it was taken early in the morning with the sky a bit misty, and i am wandering if an uploading is worthy, or it could occur in a rejection for contrast. The pictures of 787 and Beluga have been taken both with the sun quite aligned, but i think that both of them will not be considered backlit. Finally the little kids: for the picture of the embraer, i left some contrast to distinguish it from the clouds, but i have the fear to have left it still too dark; last but not least, the atr: is it soft? You know, my soft-skills about pictures are not very refined and I often need your help in this situation. Thank you in advance for any reply, have a good evening.
Hi!
I recently uploaded these photos but they were rejected by backlit, in my view they are not backlit because the light is not passing due to the tail and as far as I know if the tail is completely without light it is backlit which is beside the point.
What is your opinion?
Hi!
I recently uploaded these photos but they were rejected by backlit, in my view they are not backlit because the light is not passing due to the tail and as far as I know if the tail is completely without light it is backlit which is beside the point.
What is your opinion?
Hello People
Can you tell me your opinion about the attached images, because i am not very confident about them?
There are 3 Dhl with three different types (i have fear that the A300 is a bit soft and with the other ones i struggled with the editing because they arrived, the first one early in the morning and the A330 late in the evening, so in both cases light was not at its best); The picture of the helicopter... i am not fully satisfied; last one, the fedex 757: part of the front gear is covered by the wells of the... electric feed (i suppose), is it a problem for you or it is a physiologic situation (which actually is), and the photo can be uploaded? (there is no other way to take it during the day).
Thanks for the answers and have a nice day
L
Hello People
Can you tell me your opinion about the attached images, because i am not very confident about them?
There are 3 Dhl with three different types (i have fear that the A300 is a bit soft and with the other ones i struggled with the editing because they arrived, the first one early in the morning and the A330 late in the evening, so in both cases light was not at its best); The picture of the helicopter... i am not fully satisfied; last one, the fedex 757: part of the front gear is covered by the wells of the... electric feed (i suppose), is it a problem for you or it is a physiologic situation (which actually is), and the photo can be uploaded? (there is no other way to take it during the day).
Thanks for the answers and have a nice day
L
1-3 are soft, with minor problems with exposure/contrast
4 is oversharpened
5 is soft and obstructed
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment