Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-Screening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Will both of them be rejected for contrast, right? Plane was in full light in both cases, i had bad luck with the background, absolutely awful.
    First should be ok for contrast, second is a bit more borderline.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Will both of them be rejected for contrast, right? Plane was in full light in both cases, i had bad luck with the background, absolutely awful.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Hi
    I just ask you if the attached images are worthy for an upload or not. The interference is not that much but...i preferred asking before submitting.
    Both would be rejections for obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Hi
    I just ask you if the attached images are worthy for an upload or not. The interference is not that much but...i preferred asking before submitting.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Sorry if i post the same image for the... third time, never felt so uncomfortable in editing a photo, this is the last time. Is it better?
    Terrible color on this, sorry. Very strong cyan/green cast. Also soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Sorry if i post the same image for the... third time, never felt so uncomfortable in editing a photo, this is the last time. Is it better?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Still struggling with this photo. What do you think?
    too noisy

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Still struggling with this photo. What do you think?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Hello People
    Can you tell me your opinion about the attached images, because i am not very confident about them?
    There are 3 Dhl with three different types (i have fear that the A300 is a bit soft and with the other ones i struggled with the editing because they arrived, the first one early in the morning and the A330 late in the evening, so in both cases light was not at its best); The picture of the helicopter... i am not fully satisfied; last one, the fedex 757: part of the front gear is covered by the wells of the... electric feed (i suppose), is it a problem for you or it is a physiologic situation (which actually is), and the photo can be uploaded? (there is no other way to take it during the day).
    Thanks for the answers and have a nice day
    L
    1-3 are soft, with minor problems with exposure/contrast
    4 is oversharpened
    5 is soft and obstructed

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Hello People
    Can you tell me your opinion about the attached images, because i am not very confident about them?
    There are 3 Dhl with three different types (i have fear that the A300 is a bit soft and with the other ones i struggled with the editing because they arrived, the first one early in the morning and the A330 late in the evening, so in both cases light was not at its best); The picture of the helicopter... i am not fully satisfied; last one, the fedex 757: part of the front gear is covered by the wells of the... electric feed (i suppose), is it a problem for you or it is a physiologic situation (which actually is), and the photo can be uploaded? (there is no other way to take it during the day).
    Thanks for the answers and have a nice day
    L
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by PapaEchoDelta View Post
    Hi!
    I recently uploaded these photos but they were rejected by backlit, in my view they are not backlit because the light is not passing due to the tail and as far as I know if the tail is completely without light it is backlit which is beside the point.
    What is your opinion?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8266903
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8265170
    Tail is completely in shadow in both images.

    Originally posted by PapaEchoDelta View Post
    Photos that were taken at the same time and that you can see how the light was:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9772158
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9773147
    Neither tail is in shadow.

    Leave a comment:


  • PapaEchoDelta
    replied
    Hi!
    I recently uploaded these photos but they were rejected by backlit, in my view they are not backlit because the light is not passing due to the tail and as far as I know if the tail is completely without light it is backlit which is beside the point.
    What is your opinion?
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8266903
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8265170

    Photos that were taken at the same time and that you can see how the light was:
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9772158
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9773147

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Hi everyone. I am not fully confident about these pictures, the 777 in particular: it was taken early in the morning with the sky a bit misty, and i am wandering if an uploading is worthy, or it could occur in a rejection for contrast. The pictures of 787 and Beluga have been taken both with the sun quite aligned, but i think that both of them will not be considered backlit. Finally the little kids: for the picture of the embraer, i left some contrast to distinguish it from the clouds, but i have the fear to have left it still too dark; last but not least, the atr: is it soft? You know, my soft-skills about pictures are not very refined and I often need your help in this situation. Thank you in advance for any reply, have a good evening.
    1. borderline contrast
    2. cropping/ratio, borderline contrast/noise
    3. borderline heat haze
    4. soft, contrast
    5. cropping/ratio, soft, contrast

    Leave a comment:


  • Luca_G22
    replied
    Hi everyone. I am not fully confident about these pictures, the 777 in particular: it was taken early in the morning with the sky a bit misty, and i am wandering if an uploading is worthy, or it could occur in a rejection for contrast. The pictures of 787 and Beluga have been taken both with the sun quite aligned, but i think that both of them will not be considered backlit. Finally the little kids: for the picture of the embraer, i left some contrast to distinguish it from the clouds, but i have the fear to have left it still too dark; last but not least, the atr: is it soft? You know, my soft-skills about pictures are not very refined and I often need your help in this situation. Thank you in advance for any reply, have a good evening.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Luca_G22 View Post
    Hi everyone
    This photo has been rejected
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=8198806
    Initially i thought for something related to the lack of infos, but then i read the reason. Photo was took with the subject with the sun in front. Initially i took the first photos on the other side of the helicopter, but the friend that was with me, another jp uploader, suggested me to take the pictures on this side, because it was more entlightened. In fact sun was a little bit on the right side of the helicopter. I consider this image not backlit (i repeat, sun was in front but also more on the right side than to the left one), and a good image too, with the moon on the background.
    I agree with the screeners here. Most of what we see, is in its own shadow.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X