Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Is contrast here acceptable for JP? Thanks! Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6726-9.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	582.1 KB
ID:	1120041
    Borderline, but if I had to guess it would be no. Also a little heat haze visible.

    Comment


    • https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9315238
      Got another "jpg compression" rejection on a completely uncropped and very close-up (by airport standards) photo... The second photo from the same day, taken from the same point, with same camera/editing settings got accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10239221 What did I do wrong and what is wrong with the rejected picture? Here are my export settings in LR (JP compresses image): https://imgur.com/a/VJRBQgg
      Thanks!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
        https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9315238
        Got another "jpg compression" rejection on a completely uncropped and very close-up (by airport standards) photo... The second photo from the same day, taken from the same point, with same camera/editing settings got accepted: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10239221 What did I do wrong and what is wrong with the rejected picture?
        The compression is more visible in the sky, and the rejected image had more sky visible so it was more easily noticed.

        Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
        Here are my export settings in LR (JP compresses image): https://imgur.com/a/VJRBQgg
        Easy to see the issue, you've set a limit to the file size. This will automatically compress the image to fit that size (495k)

        Comment


        • Hello! I am concerned about postprocessing here — does the sky and sky gradient look overprocessed or is this editing OK? Thanks!
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7662.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	513.7 KB
ID:	1120612Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7500-2.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	415.9 KB
ID:	1120613

          Comment


          • Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
            Hello! I am concerned about postprocessing here — does the sky and sky gradient look overprocessed or is this editing OK? Thanks!
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7662.jpg
Views:	48
Size:	513.7 KB
ID:	1120612Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7500-2.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	415.9 KB
ID:	1120613
            Processing should be acceptable.

            Comment


            • https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9360304
              What is wrong with color here? The picture was taken during the early sunset, I left the tint at 0 (always keep it zero to avoid hue) and temperature at 5950, same as I do with my other sunset photos. The yellowish-like tint on the plane was there because of the low sun, and was not added during the postprocessing. Is it worth appealing it? Thanks!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9360304
                What is wrong with color here? The picture was taken during the early sunset, I left the tint at 0 (always keep it zero to avoid hue) and temperature at 5950, same as I do with my other sunset photos. The yellowish-like tint on the plane was there because of the low sun, and was not added during the postprocessing. Is it worth appealing it? Thanks!
                Bit of a greenish-yellow tint. Adjust it so that it is more neutral, like the left side here:

                Click image for larger version

Name:	51907_1628175763.jpeg
Views:	36
Size:	416.3 KB
ID:	1121433

                Comment


                • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Bit of a greenish-yellow tint. Adjust it so that it is more neutral, like the left side here:

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	51907_1628175763.jpeg
Views:	36
Size:	416.3 KB
ID:	1121433
                  So the "acceptable WB for JP should be around 5500/0 no matter the time of day? Got it.

                  Another not exactly the prescreening question, but not to create another thread: what are JP limits for aircraft being an aircraft? If I'll upload pictures of a 2019 birdstricken A321 remains (parts of fuselage/wings/cockpit) and a picture of a Tupolev 134 cockpit instrument boards we have in my university (still have aircraft registration on them) — would it be enough?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

                    So the "acceptable WB for JP should be around 5500/0 no matter the time of day?
                    No, the WB should be set as appears natural enough. This is subjective of course, but I would never say a single value must be applied to all images.

                    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                    Another not exactly the prescreening question, but not to create another thread: what are JP limits for aircraft being an aircraft? If I'll upload pictures of a 2019 birdstricken A321 remains (parts of fuselage/wings/cockpit) and a picture of a Tupolev 134 cockpit instrument boards we have in my university (still have aircraft registration on them) — would it be enough?
                    Possibly. Would need to see the potential images before commenting further.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X