Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    What about this pictures? Is the light OK or too dark?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5655-3.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	510.8 KB
ID:	1108644Or this one (I'll upload only one): Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5667-2.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	499.7 KB
ID:	1108645
    One of this 2: Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5687-2.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	543.6 KB
ID:	1108646Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5717-3.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	491.5 KB
ID:	1108647
    I´m not screener, but in my opinion all of them are lack of contrast, dark tones principally, also were taken in overcast conditions so the contrast may be a problem. Take care with the horizon, check the vertical references.

    Regards!
    Pablo Gonzalez de Leon.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

      I´m not screener, but in my opinion all of them are lack of contrast, dark tones principally, also were taken in overcast conditions so the contrast may be a problem. Take care with the horizon, check the vertical references.

      Regards!
      Pablo Gonzalez de Leon.
      Not overcast exactly, it is just low northern sun + thin clouds for the green 737. This any better? Click image for larger version

Name:	image_38027.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	509.4 KB
ID:	1108667Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5655-5.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	506.5 KB
ID:	1108668
      Attached Files

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

        Not overcast exactly, it is just low northern sun + thin clouds for the green 737. This any better? Click image for larger version

Name:	image_38027.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	509.4 KB
ID:	1108667Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5655-5.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	506.5 KB
ID:	1108668
        With overcast I mean no sun light hitting the plane directly, basically a photo without shadows. Anyways it still looking overexposed, with contrast issues. And horizon in the first one.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

          With overcast I mean no sun light hitting the plane directly, basically a photo without shadows. Anyways it still looking overexposed, with contrast issues. And horizon in the first one.
          Got it. Just to clarify — "contrast" means some areas (like landing gear and engines) are too dark? I used the lower pic (not mine) as the reference on how to edit. Anyway, I'll try my luck next time =)
          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5687-9.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	541.8 KB
ID:	1108675
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

            Got it. Just to clarify — "contrast" means some areas (like landing gear and engines) are too dark? I used the lower pic (not mine) as the reference on how to edit. Anyway, I'll try my luck next time =)
            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5687-9.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	541.8 KB
ID:	1108675
            Nop, in this case is the opposite, the engines or landing gear should be a bit more dark (the photo in general, but you can take this as reference if you want), the photo that you added to compare with is a perfect example of how a photo with good contrast is

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

              Nop, in this case is the opposite, the engines or landing gear should be a bit more dark (the photo in general, but you can take this as reference if you want), the photo that you added to compare with is a perfect example of how a photo with good contrast is
              Understood. Jeez, I see no difference on my monitor...
              Thank you for your help!

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

                Nop, in this case is the opposite, the engines or landing gear should be a bit more dark (the photo in general, but you can take this as reference if you want), the photo that you added to compare with is a perfect example of how a photo with good contrast is
                This editing is also awful?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5687-11.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	552.4 KB
ID:	1108682

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

                  This editing is also awful?
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5687-11.jpg Views:	0 Size:	552.4 KB ID:	1108682
                  First of all, I never said that the photo was awful.
                  Now it´s much better but still borderline contrast because of the light conditionts. Wait for a screener opinion if you want.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post

                    First of all, I never said that the photo was awful.
                    Now it´s much better but still borderline contrast because of the light conditionts. Wait for a screener opinion if you want.
                    No offence, that photo is awful for me Because I see other people taking pictures in the same conditions and getting better results! So it is not an awful lighting, but my noob skills

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Hello! Are any of these photos OK?
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6527-2.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	570.3 KB
ID:	1109022
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6336-2.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	536.1 KB
ID:	1109024 or this one (if the upper is bad):
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6276.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	620.6 KB
ID:	1109025Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6464.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	689.7 KB
ID:	1109023
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6241-2.jpg
Views:	93
Size:	578.0 KB
ID:	1109026

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                        Hello! Are any of these photos OK?
                        Quality looks ok, though the first and last are a bit too low in the frame.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                          Quality looks ok, though the first and last are a bit too low in the frame.
                          Thanks! What about this one? Is composition normal or is the aircraft still to high in the air (spotting point was close to the middle marker)? Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5870-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	401.4 KB ID:	1109036

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

                            Thanks! What about this one? Is composition normal or is the aircraft still to high in the air (spotting point was close to the middle marker)? Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5870-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	401.4 KB ID:	1109036
                            Slightly low, but centering should be acceptable. Would be rejected for overprocessed, however.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              Slightly low, but centering should be acceptable. Would be rejected for overprocessed, however.
                              Is this editing any better? Removed all clarity and dehaze effects. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5870-3.jpg
Views:	90
Size:	443.9 KB
ID:	1109082Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6002.jpg
Views:	83
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1109083

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

                                Is this editing any better? Removed all clarity and dehaze effects.
                                Editing halos still present on both.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X