Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Hello! Are any of these photos OK?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6527-2.jpg
Views:	63
Size:	570.3 KB
ID:	1109022
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6336-2.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	536.1 KB
ID:	1109024 or this one (if the upper is bad):
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6276.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	620.6 KB
ID:	1109025Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6464.jpg
Views:	64
Size:	689.7 KB
ID:	1109023
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6241-2.jpg
Views:	59
Size:	578.0 KB
ID:	1109026

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
      Hello! Are any of these photos OK?
      Quality looks ok, though the first and last are a bit too low in the frame.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        Quality looks ok, though the first and last are a bit too low in the frame.
        Thanks! What about this one? Is composition normal or is the aircraft still to high in the air (spotting point was close to the middle marker)? Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5870-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	401.4 KB ID:	1109036

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

          Thanks! What about this one? Is composition normal or is the aircraft still to high in the air (spotting point was close to the middle marker)? Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_5870-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	401.4 KB ID:	1109036
          Slightly low, but centering should be acceptable. Would be rejected for overprocessed, however.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Slightly low, but centering should be acceptable. Would be rejected for overprocessed, however.
            Is this editing any better? Removed all clarity and dehaze effects. Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5870-3.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	443.9 KB
ID:	1109082Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6002.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	452.3 KB
ID:	1109083

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

              Is this editing any better? Removed all clarity and dehaze effects.
              Editing halos still present on both.

              Comment


              • #82
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Editing halos still present on both.
                Stupid question — what settings do cause the halos? If I understand right, a thin line around the aircraft is much brighter than surrounding areas. Does turning down lights/contrast/sharpening help?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6002-3.jpg
Views:	56
Size:	411.7 KB
ID:	1109089Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6002-2.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	418.2 KB
ID:	1109090
                This issue is almost on every my picture taken under the glideslope.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

                  Stupid question — what settings do cause the halos? If I understand right, a thin line around the aircraft is much brighter than surrounding areas. Does turning down lights/contrast/sharpening help?
                  No, I'm not talking about sharpening halos. These are the result of edits to highlight/shadow areas, usually with tools like shadow/highlights, clarity, vibrance, DLighting, etc.

                  Both images above have relatively strong halos.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    No, I'm not talking about sharpening halos. These are the result of edits to highlight/shadow areas, usually with tools like shadow/highlights, clarity, vibrance, DLighting, etc.

                    Both images above have relatively strong halos.
                    Thank you for your help! This are my settings, no max/min like +- 70-90.
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Settings.png
Views:	53
Size:	118.8 KB
ID:	1109097

                    And the result:
                    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_6002-4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	396.9 KB ID:	1109095
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                      And the result:
                      There are no halos on this image.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        I may be stupid, but this counts as "special scheme", right?
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6206-2.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	715.3 KB
ID:	1109293 Compared to the standard:
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6497.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	648.5 KB
ID:	1109294

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                          I may be stupid, but this counts as "special scheme", right?
                          Yes sir.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Hello. Are these photos acceptable? Thanks!
                            Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6428.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	642.4 KB
ID:	1109479Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6385.jpg
Views:	43
Size:	674.4 KB
ID:	1109480Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6375.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	607.7 KB
ID:	1109481Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6091.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	660.9 KB
ID:	1109482Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6134.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	696.8 KB
ID:	1109483

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                              Hello. Are these photos acceptable? Thanks!
                              All of them are lack of contrast for me.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
                                Hello. Are these photos acceptable?
                                Yes, they should be.

                                Originally posted by PabloGlez View Post
                                All of them are lack of contrast for me.
                                The contrast is fine.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X