Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Hello! Is this photo acceptable or the sunlight/contrast is too low?
    A bit, but acceptable for me.

    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    And this crop/composition? CRJ is a little low in the frame on purpose (so I don't have to crop the tip of Embraer's vertical stabilizer?)
    Also a bit dark, but centering ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Hello! Is this photo acceptable or the sunlight/contrast is too low?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3527-2.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	695.4 KB
ID:	1117835 And this crop/composition? CRJ is a little low in the frame on purpose (so I don't have to crop the tip of Embraer's vertical stabilizer?)
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3363-2.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	666.2 KB
ID:	1117836

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Hello. Is color/WB acceptable here?
    It would be acceptable for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Hello. Is color/WB acceptable here? Thanks.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2821-4.jpg
Views:	10
Size:	656.7 KB
ID:	1117406

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

    Thanks. Is color good now? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2576-6.jpg
Views:	19
Size:	565.7 KB
ID:	1117146
    Slightly better than the previous, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Slight yellow cast.
    Thanks. Is color good now? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2576-6.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	565.7 KB
ID:	1117146

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

    Thanks. What about this one?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2576-3.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	567.3 KB
ID:	1117028
    Slight yellow cast.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Heat haze is visible in both images. It is not something that can be removed during postprocessing.
    Thanks. What about this one?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2576-3.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	567.3 KB
ID:	1117028

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Hello! Need your opinion on the following picture. Haze was already rising from the ground, I tried to remove it during the postprocessing — is the photo acceptable?
    Heat haze is visible in both images. It is not something that can be removed during postprocessing.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Hello! Need your opinion on the following picture. Haze was already rising from the ground, I tried to remove it during the postprocessing — is the photo acceptable?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2438-4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	675.6 KB ID:	1117016
    And here is my take№2 on a small soviet fella with a 200mm lens. Is quality good enough to be accepted or the plane is still to small and soft?
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_2629-4.jpg Views:	0 Size:	455.6 KB ID:	1117017

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Hello. Is quality and detail of this image acceptable or not? The plane was so small I had to crop a significant part of the image.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1584.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	410.6 KB
ID:	1116230
    Slight soft, poor contrast, and some compression. Contrast probably the biggest issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Hello. Is quality and detail of this image acceptable or not? The plane was so small I had to crop a significant part of the image.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1584.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	410.6 KB
ID:	1116230

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post

    Thanks. Does this version also have halos (no significant postprocessing, just added some contrast but part of the sky under the fuselage also seems white on the editing tool)?
    Better, though you'll probably want to remove the dust spots as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Definitely looks like editing halos to me.
    Thanks. Does this version also have halos (no significant postprocessing, just added some contrast but part of the sky under the fuselage also seems white on the editing tool)?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0956-8.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	341.1 KB
ID:	1116117

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=9142338
    This photo was rejected for bad/overprocessing and bad info. Are the white areas halos and I should remove them? Also, I didn't include the airport info on this and 2 following photos on purpose. This is not a civilian airport and Putin recently went nuts over finding spies enemies of Russia so I fear for my freedom and life (they put people in jail even for smaller "crimes"). Click image for larger version

Name:	procimages.jpeg
Views:	55
Size:	585.5 KB
ID:	1116106
    Definitely looks like editing halos to me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X