Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_6474-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	889.5 KB ID:	1095047 What about these one?
    Also no.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_6474-3.jpg Views:	0 Size:	889.5 KB ID:	1095047 What about these one?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    These 2 pictures - are they acceptable? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5784-5.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	491.4 KB
ID:	1094729Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5858-2.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	424.8 KB
ID:	1094730
    No.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    These 2 pictures - are they acceptable? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5784-5.jpg
Views:	86
Size:	491.4 KB
ID:	1094729Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5858-2.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	424.8 KB
ID:	1094730

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Hello! Is it possible to save this picture?
    I understand it is not the best idea to shoot in the low-light conditions, but maybe postprocessing in Lightroom can help?
    Don't think so.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Hello! Is it possible to save this picture?
    I understand it is not the best idea to shoot in the low-light conditions, but maybe postprocessing in Lightroom can help?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5500-6.jpg
Views:	84
Size:	620.6 KB
ID:	1094661
    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_5500-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	635.1 KB ID:	1094659
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Thanks! Turned exposure down and re-done the crop.
    Would be rejected for centering, overprocessed, and dirty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pilot8998
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343 View Post

    Not just a little overexposed, I'd say genuinely overexposed
    That‘s true too LX-A343. Well it‘s a little bit different - I have no screening tools (e.g. Histogram) on the forum. But we have both the same opinion - It has a bad framing and it‘s overexposed.

    Regards
    Julian

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by Pilot8998 View Post

    Hello pandapilot!

    I'm not a screener on JetPhotos but I'll give you some advices:

    First one:
    Picture looks good, but please remove the dust spot over the wing and another one small dust spot on the buttom. Otherwise this will result in a rejection.

    Second one:
    The photo quality of this picture is ok, but please check the exposure with the help of the histogram. It looks a little (only a little bit) overexposed.
    Additionally apply a little bit more sharpness and the main problem of the picture is the framing. The airplane is framed to hight - so center it lower.

    Kind Regards
    Julian
    Not just a little overexposed, I'd say genuinely overexposed

    Leave a comment:


  • Pilot8998
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    Another two of my pics. Would they be acceptable? (Horizon on the first one is leveled, the plane is performing "Afghanistan landing" with -15 degree pitch)
    Hello pandapilot!

    I'm not a screener on JetPhotos but I'll give you some advices:

    First one:
    Picture looks good, but please remove the dust spot over the wing and another one small dust spot on the buttom. Otherwise this will result in a rejection.

    Second one:
    The photo quality of this picture is ok, but please check the exposure with the help of the histogram. It looks a little (only a little bit) overexposed.
    Additionally apply a little bit more sharpness and the main problem of the picture is the framing. The airplane is framed to hight - so center it lower.

    Kind Regards
    Julian

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    Took a couple of photos today - are any acceptable? I am a total noob, so feel free to tell me leave them (if they are trash) and move on. Thanks!
    Not trash. Contrast a bit low on all of them, but otherwise should be acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Added a little more
    Maybe you didn't understand the polite way, so let's try a little more directly... please stop. This will never be acceptable. Time to move on to a different image.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    My final take on this frame, decreased the contrast 50 and 70 points. Is it any better or still not fixable?
    Still not up to standards, botch lack contrast.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Contrast is way too over?
    Yes. Don't think this one is fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Julian S.
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Thanks! Added some contrast and sharpness. Is it better?
    Hi.

    For me personally the 2nd is still too soft, also the contrast seems not fixable this time, sorry. The first could be okay.

    Regards.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X