Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreen advice?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sandra
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot View Post
    Another bunch of my nooby photos. Is the composition OK or should I try and find other angles? Thanks for your help!
    The composition seems to be ok but the photos are showing issues with contrast and sharpness.

    Leave a comment:


  • pandapilot
    replied
    Another bunch of my nooby photos. Is the composition OK or should I try and find other angles? Thanks for your help! Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2469-3.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	389.5 KB
ID:	1091963Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3098-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	402.5 KB ID:	1091960Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_3005-2.jpg Views:	0 Size:	657.4 KB ID:	1091962

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    You mean - similar unacceptable because of the composition/noise?
    You may only upload one image per side/sequence. These images were taken seconds apart; in the future please choose just one.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Thanks! This is my final take on these frames, if they cannot get any better I'll ask my friend to lend me his manual soviet 135mm and see if it makes any difference. I've reduced clarity, saturation and dehaze settings to zero and added some contrast.
    These would be considered similar, though the sharpness looks acceptable.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Tried with a few other ones, these are the best ones I could find:
    Those are all a bit soft too, but can't tell if blurry or not so may be fixable with better edits. If doing so, I'd crop a little less tightly.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot

    Well... I use a cheap 50$ canon 75-300 lens (the only one I can afford ((( ), the camera was in Tv. Changed the image composition (honestly tried to copy this two https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9596063 and https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9380372, taken at the exact same spot) and reducted the noise.
    Better, but aircraft is still somewhat soft/blurry. Maybe you should try editing a frame that doesn't have that issue so badly.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    P.S. I tried to set sharpening settings as shown in the video tutorial (amount 100, radius 1.6, detail 72, masking 50), but I don't see any difference on my monitor. Here is the result:
    This is better, though noisier, and other issues remain.

    In general, best way to avoid a soft image is to make sure the original is as sharp as possible - this is influenced by many factors such as lens quality, camera settings, weather conditions, so it would be difficult to say what exactly is causing it in your image(s). You can also hide such quality deficiencies by using a lower resolution like 1200pix instead of 1500.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    Another try with new photos. Tried to take them in the best conditions possible, any advise on processing/acceptability?
    1. soft, cut off
    2. soft/blurry, horizon, centering

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    Thanks! Is this one better?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29689[/ATTACH]
    Horizon is ok, but very soft now, and stabilizer is cut off.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    I took this picture in more sunny conditions - is it any better? It is cropped a little so I can correct the composition if it's looking wrong. Thank you for your help and feedback in advance.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29674[/ATTACH]
    Horizon's a bit off (needs CW rotation) and needs better centering, but quality looks ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    That's why I was asking about the camera. It is very noisy at 200+ ISO, and in weather like this I have to shoot f/11 1/800 at 1600 ISO (and even after that I have to add the exposure in lightroom). The results are not very good...
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]29268[/ATTACH]
    As I hinted at, nothing to do with your camera, and everything to do with the conditions and skill/knowledge of the photographer. A $4000 camera/lens would unlikely provide materially better results I guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    Thanks! And "right conditions" mean more sun and a better place to spot?
    Basically, yes.

    Originally posted by pandapilot
    That could be a real problem for me, considering I am taking mist of my pictures in St. Peteresburg (ULLI/LED). We have around 60 sunny days per year and quite a few spotting events...
    Speaking as one, such is the plight of spotters who live in northerly areas

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by pandapilot
    And can the noise or blur be the result of using a cheap camera/lens (2008 canon 400d and 75-300 zoom)? I can not affird a more expensive one bc I am broke(
    No, more a result of you shooting in less that ideal conditions. Under the right conditions, such equipment should be more than enough to produce images with good enough quality to be accepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShipSash
    replied
    These are right accepted photos. For your images look histogram for details. This issue is may be easy corrected by levels in PS unlike other issues.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShipSash
    replied
    Hello. I am not screener but all your photos are not acceptable.
    Reasons:
    1. Dark/Underexposed
    Composition/Centering
    Little contrast
    Noise/Grain
    Jpg compression artefacts
    Undersharpen/soft
    2. Dark/Underexposed
    Composition/Centering
    Little contrast
    Noise/Grain
    Jpg compression artefacts
    Undersharpen/soft
    3. Dark/Underexposed
    Composition/Centering
    Noise/Grain
    Jpg compression artefacts
    Undersharpen/soft
    4. Dark/Underexposed
    Composition/Centering
    Little contrast
    Noise/Grain
    Jpg compression artefacts
    Undersharpen/soft
    Blurry
    Heat distortion
    5. Dark/Underexposed
    Noise/Grain
    Jpg compression artefacts
    Undersharpen/soft
    Backlit
    And all have dust spots.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X