Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Delta95Heavy - Prescreening/Rejection Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post
    Long time no see. Was wondering if I could some critique on these please?
    Dark, dirty.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Bump since this post seems to have been forgotten about by Dana.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Long time no see. Was wondering if I could some critique on these please?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	9N0A4500-Enhanced-NR.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	404.4 KB
ID:	1173371Click image for larger version

Name:	9N0A4633-Enhanced-NR.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	528.4 KB
ID:	1173372

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post
    Hey Dana, thoughts on these 3 please? Hope you are doing well in the New Year.
    All are dark and look slightly heat hazed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Hey Dana, thoughts on these 3 please? Hope you are doing well in the New Year.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	01-23-2023-6367.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	342.8 KB
ID:	1153503Click image for larger version

Name:	01-23-2023-6485.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	362.2 KB
ID:	1153504Click image for larger version

Name:	01-23-2023-6502.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	342.9 KB
ID:	1153505

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post

    I'll work on that and maybe export it a touch smaller and see if that does anything. Thoughts on these?
    Borderline dark/soft/noisy. Looks like relatively heavy crops.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    JP's check for dust feature is much more powerful.



    Oversharpened/heat hazed.
    I'll work on that and maybe export it a touch smaller and see if that does anything. Thoughts on these?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	11-03-2022-5647.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	545.9 KB
ID:	1148271

    Click image for larger version

Name:	11-03-2022-5738.jpg
Views:	74
Size:	512.3 KB
ID:	1148272

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post


    Quick question: On a couple of recent uploads to the queue, I have used the "Check for Dust" feature and see what looks like possible dust spots on the images. When I recheck them in Lightroom Classic, there is nothing there indicating any spots. I have also double checked using the Pinetools dot com equalize image website and it doesn't show any there either. Any reason that you know of why that might be happening?
    JP's check for dust feature is much more powerful.

    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post
    Lastly, thoughts on this photo.
    Oversharpened/heat hazed.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    I have always just used the JP equalize feature as it is very strong and shows spots that usually aren’t visible in LR or other websites. Not a screener so I cannot comment on the photo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. dirty, borderline dark
    2. borderline dark
    3. dark, borderline overprocessed
    Totally didn't catch the dust spots on that A350K, fixed that. Redid #3 entirely and added some exposure to the first 2 and queued up all 3.

    Quick question: On a couple of recent uploads to the queue, I have used the "Check for Dust" feature and see what looks like possible dust spots on the images. When I recheck them in Lightroom Classic, there is nothing there indicating any spots. I have also double checked using the Pinetools dot com equalize image website and it doesn't show any there either. Any reason that you know of why that might be happening?

    Lastly, thoughts on this photo. Thanks Dana!


    Click image for larger version  Name:	10-05-2022-4123.jpg Views:	0 Size:	459.0 KB ID:	1147635

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post

    Fixed, uploaded and already on JP as well as the 717 from the previous post. Thoughts on these 3? Many thanks Dana as always! Hope your vacay went well.
    1. dirty, borderline dark
    2. borderline dark
    3. dark, borderline overprocessed

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Needs CW rotation.
    Fixed, uploaded and already on JP as well as the 717 from the previous post. Thoughts on these 3? Many thanks Dana as always! Hope your vacay went well.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	10-22-2022-4831.jpg Views:	0 Size:	375.8 KB ID:	1147385


    Click image for larger version  Name:	10-22-2022-4891.jpg Views:	0 Size:	376.7 KB ID:	1147386


    Click image for larger version  Name:	10-22-2022-4887.jpg Views:	0 Size:	324.7 KB ID:	1147384

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post

    Always appreciated. Thoughts on this catch from this afternoon? I leveled the photo off the tower behind the brown building below the 777.
    Needs CW rotation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Delta95Heavy
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    A touch dark, but otherwise ok for me.
    Always appreciated. Thoughts on this catch from this afternoon? I leveled the photo off the tower behind the brown building below the 777.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	09-28-2022-3616.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	378.5 KB
ID:	1146065

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Delta95Heavy View Post
    Been a while since I have been here. Enjoying some vacay time. Was wondering about this Delta 717 if I could get an honest opinion, please. And thanks as always!
    A touch dark, but otherwise ok for me.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X